[martin gibson]

WAIT A MINUTE -

Please do NOT allow our fuzzy wemyn and NYT neo-Stalinist buddies to Slanderously frame this argument as a 'feminist' issue when it is properly defined as clearly a racist attempt by the New York Times to prevent Tiger Woods from participating in the Master's tournament solely because he describes himself as 'non-white'.

I could really use some help down here in the language war. Realistically, however, I am waiting for the gentlemen and ladies in the debating society to quietly smile and politely wait their turn until they are blind-sided and black-jacked by the jackbooted National Socialist dykes who are surely waiting for them.

We need to define the argument repeatedly and unambiguously.

A rat is a dog is a pig is a feminist (...with profound apologies to rats, dogs and pigs...).

[ewing]

The New York Times should do an article on why Tiger played the race card when he came into golf with those Nike ads 'There are some courses, I cannot play in this country because of the color of my skin'

And now Tiger has no opinion on Augusta...

[yoe]

Right on Target! Bingo!

[uncommonsense]

when it is properly defined as clearly a racist attempt by the New York Times to prevent Tiger Woods from participating in the Master's tournament

I get the impression you say this with some level of jest, but its true. Why didn't they call on Phil Mickelson, #2 in the world, to boycot?