Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
Did the police have to enter to discover the activity, or was opening the door and observing from outside sufficient?

I don't know the particulars of the case, but I beleive that they merely had to open the door and look in. It was the living room where the "activity" was taking place. Does this matter legally? Should this matter legally?

150 posted on 12/07/2002 5:58:17 AM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
I don't know the particulars of the case, but I beleive that they merely had to open the door and look in. It was the living room where the "activity" was taking place. Does this matter legally? Should this matter legally?

Interesting question. If one feels that people should be allowed to engage freely [with regard to society's laws--not with regard to Judgement Day] in non-commercial sexual relations provided that (1) they don't violate things like marriage contracts, and (2) they take reasonable care to avoid discovery, then the two questions that arise in this case are: -1- Did the police do anything illegal, given that they had what they reasonably believed to be accurate information about a crime-in-progress?

-2- Did the men take reasonable care to avoid discovery, or would reasonable care have required that they either undertake their activities away from the entrance [which they may have done, I don't know] and/or lock the door?

174 posted on 12/07/2002 9:52:16 AM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson