Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM's $2.1bn Rational deal to upset market - Big Blue's biggest takeover since acquiring Lotus
vnunet ^

Posted on 12/08/2002 11:31:34 AM PST by chance33_98



IBM's $2.1bn Rational deal to upset market

By Peter Williams [06-12-2002]

Big Blue's biggest takeover since acquiring Lotus

In its largest software takeover since acquiring Lotus, IBM is to buy software development tools company Rational Software for approximately $2.1bn (£1.33bn). Rational provides software and services to 98 of the Fortune 100 companies, including IBM itself, operating in a market that analyst group IDC estimates will grow from $9bn (£5.7bn) now to $15bn (£9.5bn) by 2006.

Ian Charlesworth, senior research analyst at Butler Group, said: "The announcement is clearly huge news, and is likely to 'unsettle' the application development market, not least Microsoft.

"It demonstrates just how critically application design and development is to IBM as a whole."

Rational had positioned itself cleverly and until today had been seen as independent, Charlesworth said.

"Like it or not, it has plunged into the IBM world, and this could affect the way existing users feel. Managing the expectations and concerns of users may prove to be the greatest challenge," he added.

Michael Devlin, Rational's chief executive, said: "The combination of IBM and Rational is a logical extension to what has been a very beneficial 20-year relationship."

IBM vice president Steve Mills said: "This is an important part of IBM's On Demand strategy." He added that Rational would help provide infrastructure software and tools to give customers a complete software development environment.

In recent months integrated development environment companies like Borland and modelling tools specialists such as Rational have been moving into each other's territories as they expand across the development lifecycle and adopt open standards.

One driver has been the Object Management Group's model-driven architecture standard that attempts to convert standard system models into application code.

IBM's main acquisitions since January 2000



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2002 11:31:34 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Bad, bad, bad, bad, BAD move by Rational.

IBM is where good companies go to die.

In a midnight-stealth deal, the CEO took the IBM offer without even waiting for a competing offer from Microsoft, when most of Rational's customers use their tools on Microsoft's platforms.

Now, instead of providing additional revenue to IBM, Microsoft will improve Visio's UML tools, and bury Rational Rose and the rest of the software suite without so much as a whimper.

Anyone remember Notes? Sure, the CEO and the board get rich, but for the great developers at Rational, I expect most of them will end up in Redmond in the not too distant future.

2 posted on 12/08/2002 11:42:18 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
Now, instead of providing additional revenue to IBM, Microsoft will improve Visio's UML tools, and bury Rational Rose and the rest of the software suite without so much as a whimper.

According to a Business Week article, Microsoft was planning inhouse development to replace the Rational offerings!

3 posted on 12/08/2002 12:14:18 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Got a link?
4 posted on 12/08/2002 12:26:28 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"already doing in house development"

Absolutely. This is a fight to the death between IBM, and Intel/Microsoft for control of the network computing space.

IBM bought Rational because they knew of Microsofts own development....and they knew they needed this technology to own the business applications back-end.

And anyone who thinks Visio's UML is even close to Rational code is smokin' somthin'.

5 posted on 12/08/2002 12:34:49 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
Anyone remember Notes?

*shudder* We're stuck with that bloated piece of crapware in our operation. I never knew how bad it could be, but Notes is truly an abomination.

6 posted on 12/08/2002 12:34:58 PM PST by egarvue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I found the article, and this quote:

"The real threat, however, is Microsoft, which is also making the same move. While Rational has long been allied with Microsoft, the software giant now shows every sign of developing its own tools."

Microsoft is one of my clients, and I dont know where they get this idea, which appears to be speculation more than reporting anyway.

Microsoft's Visual Studio.NET Enterprise has an enhanced version of Visio which does a less than adequate job of UML modeling and code generation, and is very weak compared to Rational Rose.

It would have been just as easy for Microsoft to throw a little pocket change at Rational to pick them up, but they were not given the opportunity.

I have no doubt that Microsoft now feels it was treated rudely by a partner, which usually ends up with Microsoft placing a big target on that company's back. In two years, I expect the Rational tools to be marginalized niche products.

7 posted on 12/08/2002 12:35:47 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
Notes is a testament to just how great the IBM sales division is.

There are not too many corporations who's people could actually sell that product for money.

Notes is a product that most companies wouldnt use if it was free.

8 posted on 12/08/2002 12:41:07 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
Bad, bad, bad, bad, BAD move by Rational.

IBM is where good companies go to die.

You say that like it's a bad thing. :-)

I had to use Rational Rose a few years back, and IMHO it hurt more than helped for writing C++ code. They had a miserable GUI coupled with a screwed-up scheme for "automatic" code generation where Rose would generate the header files and empty definitions for the functions (the easy part), and the programmer had to wade into a file that looked like so many random characters to write the actual code. Instead of just writing the code, we had to spend all kinds of time figuring out how to get the "tool" to spit out the right thing.

Anyway, I'm still bitter about it.
9 posted on 12/08/2002 12:41:08 PM PST by kilohertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
REDMOND'S SHADOW. The real threat, however, is Microsoft, which is also making the same move. While Rational has long been allied with Microsoft, the software giant now shows every sign of developing its own tools. Without IBM's marketing muscle and corporate customer base to sell to, over the course of several years Microsoft could walk away with much of the business Rational now does for it. Rational "needs to be closer to IBM," warns Gilpin.

IBM's Rational Self-Interest

Hopefully the link will work for you!

10 posted on 12/08/2002 12:42:07 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
Doesn't this boost IBM's Eclipse strategy?
11 posted on 12/08/2002 12:42:18 PM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
*shudder* We're stuck with that bloated piece of crapware in our operation. I never knew how bad it could be, but Notes is truly an abomination.


Notes is one of the best software tools ever. Name one software tool that provides industrial strength security, workflow, and an integrated development kit. Best of all, this is software that works day in and day out. To the end users in our company, it is the best thing IT ever installed.
12 posted on 12/08/2002 12:44:37 PM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
bury Rational Rose and the rest of the software suite without so much as a whimper

I think you're right about Rose. Visio is a poor man's Rose already, Rose is bigtime bloatware, and Microsoft will walk right into that market. But the cross platform tools like Purify aren't a target market for Microsoft. But the bloat in Purify and ClearCase will end up killing them too.

13 posted on 12/08/2002 12:46:04 PM PST by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98; *tech_index; Sparta; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; ...
Good discussion going on here!

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

14 posted on 12/08/2002 12:47:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kilohertz
I use the current version of Rose with VS.NET. It appears that they have solved most of the code generation issues.

The biggest problem with Rose, is that it takes as long to learn to use correctly, as it does to just code up your project. Rose and the rest of the Rational Suite is unsuitable for anything but the largest of projects, unless (like me) you can get the tools and training for free.

Because I work for a number of companies at any one time, Rational's tools have been very helpful to me from a modeling perspective, and the XDE works well with both C# and VB.NET code-gen.

There is a pretty good discussion going on over at Slashdot about this very thing.

15 posted on 12/08/2002 12:54:13 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doosee
You need medication.
16 posted on 12/08/2002 12:54:57 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
"*shudder* We're stuck with that bloated piece of crapware in our operation. I never knew how bad it could be, but Notes is truly an abomination."

Use it every day. It's not nearly as bad as you say; far from it, actually........and I've used most such packages on the market over the years. A bit on the complex side to set up, but it just ................works. Have it fired up right now, matter of fact.

17 posted on 12/08/2002 12:55:26 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: palmer
But the bloat in Purify and ClearCase will end up killing them too.

I'll certainly be watching developments.

18 posted on 12/08/2002 12:56:27 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
Doesn't this boost IBM's Eclipse strategy?

Yeah, but try describing that strategy in an Elevator speech. IBM has already forgotten everything that Gerstner taught them.

19 posted on 12/08/2002 12:56:37 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
I think you're right. The record shows that Microsoft sometimes starts behind, makes an inferior product, and takes a few years to catch up, but in the end they usually produce a better product. It happened to Netscape, Realplayer, dBase, and a host of other niche companies.

IBM has done a pretty good job of coming back from the abyss, but other than their core businesses they haven't shown much creativity.
20 posted on 12/08/2002 12:56:43 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson