Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Black-robed vultures.
1 posted on 12/09/2002 11:53:36 AM PST by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *bang_list
bang
2 posted on 12/09/2002 11:54:57 AM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
The Constitution is in irrelevant anachronism that was wounded by Lincoln pronounced dead by FDR and buried by LBJ, it no longer applies.
3 posted on 12/09/2002 11:56:08 AM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
Nobody ever mentions the impeachment option. Why is that? Oh, yeah.......that's right......we're waiting for Trent Lott's testicles to drop.
5 posted on 12/09/2002 12:05:24 PM PST by You Gotta Be Kidding Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
who possess about as much common sense as stray cats in heat and about as much legal acumen as rabid ferrets with Tourette’s Syndrome

"Soda out the nose alert"

Somebody owes me a keyboard and monitor. ROFL

6 posted on 12/09/2002 12:15:22 PM PST by Johnny Gage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
To give a modicum of credit to the third judge on that panel – he did dissent from the Second Amendment portion of the written opinion.

Perhaps I completely misunderstood the dissent. Judge Magill dissented, saying that the plaintiffs had no standing, therefore he couldn't join in the discussion of the merits of the 2nd amendment claims. Why did they not have standing? Why, because the 2nd amendment is a collective right, not an individual right.

I see no reason to give this judge even a modicum or credit.

8 posted on 12/09/2002 12:45:09 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
...and about as much legal acumen as rabid ferrets with Tourette’s Syndrome (no offense intended to people who actually suffer from this disorder)

And what about the ferrets, then? Eh? What about the ferrets?

9 posted on 12/09/2002 12:48:53 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
Understanding Ninth Circuit judges - or any other federal judge for that matter - should one be so inclined, becomes much simplier when you realize that the first requirement to become a federal judge is to have contributed a minimum of $10,000 per year to the party of his / her choice in order to even secure a nomination. Judges are not appointed for merit or scholarship; they are appointed as a reward for fund raising or other political service. In other words, they are political hacks with a law degree.
10 posted on 12/09/2002 12:56:28 PM PST by Res Nullius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson