Skip to comments.
Conservative African-American Group Project 21 Addresses Lott-Thurmond
Project 21 (e-mail release) ^
| David Almasi
Posted on 12/12/2002 4:08:51 AM PST by mhking
Conservative African-American Group Project 21 Addresses Lott-Thurmond
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 11, 2002
CONTACT: David Almasi (202) 371-1400 x106 or e-mail
Members of the conservative African-American leadership network Project 21
are dismayed by recent remarks by incoming Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott
At a December 5 100th birthday celebration for retiring Senator Strom
Thurmond (R-SC), Lott said: "I want to say this about my state: When Strom
Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the
rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these
problems over all these years, either." Thurmond's 1948 presidential
candidacy was based on a pro-segregation platform.
Lott since has apologized, saying his comments were "a poor choice of words"
and that his praise for Thurmond referred to Thurmond's stance on issues
other than segregation.
Project 21 members hold differing views on whether Lott should resign as
Majority Leader. Although no Project 21 member says Lott actually supports
segregationist policies, many believe he should resign the post.
Project 21 member and syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock says: "The only
people who benefited from Lott's comments are Democrats who now have an
all-purpose bogeyman. Next year will see President Bush's tax cuts morph
into the 'Trent Lott Tax Act,' designed to siphon money from poor blacks and
hand it to rich white people in the suburbs. President Bush's goal of
individual Social Security accounts will be dubbed the 'Trent Lott Pension
Scheme' to rob black widows and hand their pensions to wealthy whites on
Wall Street. And good luck to GOP candidates who pose for pictures with
Lott. They can look forward to seeing their faces beside Lott's in campaign
attack ads. What a splendid way to anger black Democrats and drive them to
the polls. Lott should do the right thing and take a seat in the back of
the Senate bus."
Project 21 member Ak'bar Shabazz, a Republican Party activist, supplied his
own view: "If Republicans are serious about not conceding the black vote to
the Democrats, then Senator Lott must be removed from his leadership
position. His presence will allow Democrats to continue to portray
Republicans as insensitive to the concerns of the black community. As we
continue to inform and relay the true nature of the conservatism, his words
will be used as ammunition against us for as long as he's present. We have
to remove that round from the chamber."
Not all Project 21 members believe Lott should step down as Majority Leader.
Reverend Jesse Peterson, president and CEO of the Brotherhood Organization
of a New Destiny, speaking for his group, said: "We have accepted Lott's
apology and need no further explanation. He's proven himself over the years
to be a good man. Al Sharpton is thinking of running for President. I
wonder if he'll apologize for the Tawana Brawley incident and past comments
he made about Jews. We are asking Trent Lott not to resign, and trust him
any day over any member of the Congressional Black Caucus or Sharpton."
Very many Project 21 members compared the criticism of Lott to that received
by liberal politicians displaying racial insensitivities, citing an apparent
double standard. Comments by Project 21 member Michael King reflected the
thoughts of many: "Bill Clinton's political mentors — former Arkansas
Senator J. William Fulbright (D) and former Arkansas Governor Orville Faubus
(D) — were both rabid segregationists, yet Clinton gave Fulbright a medal
and praises him to this day. West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) is
not only a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, but he has never gone on
record as renouncing or apologizing for his involvement in that
organization. Yet we are supposed to tar and feather Trent Lott?"
Project 21 has been a leading voice in the African-American community since
1992. For more information, contact David Almasi at (202) 371-1400 x106 or
Project21@nationalcenter.org, or visit Project 21's web site at
- 30 -
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
posted on 12/12/2002 4:08:51 AM PST
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:09:13 AM PST
To: mhking; Trueblackman
Is this Trueblackman's group?
BTW, he was great last night on The Factor!
Is this Trueblackman's group?
Kevin's a member, but this isn't the group that he's most associated with - he's with the African-American Republican Leadership Council (and I missed him on The Factor last night!).
posted on 12/12/2002 4:16:35 AM PST
bump for later
Selective Moral Outrage: Looking beyond Trent Lotts gaffe.
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, Bill Clinton traveled to Fayetteville, Arkansas to honor the life of the late Arkansas senator, J. William Fulbright by dedicating a seven-foot-tall bronze statue of the man.
According to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "The $100,000 sculpture is the final [expenditure] of an $850,000 fundraising campaign for a project to honor Fulbright. The $750,000 fountain was dedicated October 24, 1998."
Among other things, Clinton said, "If [Fulbright] were here today, I'm sure he would caution us not to be too utopian in our expectations, but rather utopian in our values and vision."
And back on May 5, 1993, in what the Washington Post characterized as a "... moving 88th birthday ceremony for former senator William Fulbright, President Clinton last night bestowed the Presidential Medal of Freedom on the man he described as a visionary humanitarian, a steadfast supporter of the values of education, and 'my mentor.'" Clinton added, "It doesn't take long to live a life. He made the best of his, and helped us to have a better chance to make the best of ours.
The American political system produced this remarkable man, and my state did, and I'm real proud of it."
Of course, the man Clinton was praising, who he called his "mentor," who supposedly embraced utopian values and made the world a better place for everyone, was also a rabid segregationist.
In 1956, Fulbright was one of 19 senators who issued a statement entitled the "Southern Manifesto." This document condemned the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. Its signers stated, among other things, that "We commend the motives of those States which have declared the intention to resist forced integration by any lawful means." They stated further, "We pledge ourselves to use all lawful means to bring about reversal of this decision which is contrary to the Constitution and to prevent the use of force in its implementation."
Of course, in 1957, the first serious challenge to Brown occurred in Fulbright's backyard. Fulbright's Democrat colleague, Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus (another early Clinton backer) ordered the National Guard to surround Central High School in Little Rock to prevent nine black students from attending the school. President Dwight Eisenhower dispatched the 101st Airborne Division to protect these teenagers and enforce the Supreme Court's decision.
Fulbright later voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. And he did so because he believed in separating the races in schools and other public places. He was a segregationist, heart and soul.
Now, given the turmoil surrounding Trent Lott's foolish statement last week about Strom Thurmond's 1948 presidential campaign, you'd think there would have been at least some outcry when Bill Clinton lionized Fulbright a mere six weeks ago, or when he awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1993. But there was nothing in the Washington Post admonishing Clinton, which today published a scathing editorial against Lott. There was no criticism in the New York Times, which today is running a vicious column by Paul Krugman implying that Lott is an overt racist.
And while I'm on the subject, I don't remember some of the conservatives now voicing outrage at Lott holding Clinton to the same standard either in 1993 or October of this year.
But I'm not making excuses for Trent Lott. He should have apologized for his insensitive comments, and he did. Nor am I making excuses for Strom Thurmond's past. I'm questioning the hypocrisy of selective moral outrage by the Left.
There is no rule that says that the President of the Senate has to be a sitting senator. If the Republicans were smart they would dump Lott and give the job to Alan Keyes. Now THAT would make for interesting politics.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:23:18 AM PST
Why Gang Up on Lott When Rather and Wallace Get Off?
Instead, I was wondering when the major media would get around to reporting Dan Rathers racist remarks.
I am talking about his comments in July of 2001, while on the Imus show, when Rather slammed CBS news exec for forcing him to report on the Gary Condit story.
Rather said on air, "What happened was they [CBS management] got the willies, they got the Buckwheats. Their knees wobbled and we gave it up."
Of course, the Buckwheat term is used to describe a frightened black man. At the time of Rathers use of the term, NewsMax noted that other public figures had gotten into hot water, even lost their jobs, for using the term.
Not limousine liberal Dan Rather.
Or what about his CBS colleague Mike Wallace. Wallace once said, with film rolling, that Blacks and Hispanics had difficulty filling our loan applications. According to Wallace, they were simply too busy eating watermelons and tacos to learn how to read and write.
The comments made by Rather and Wallace are far more insensitive than anything Trent Lott has said. Why have they never been held to account or asked to resign?
The liberal hypocrisy continues.
Agree that Trent Lott in his Southern hospitality mode of exaggerated praise at a hundred year old birthday party said some thoughtless things falsely implying support for segregation when he probably had national defense in mind.
But as long as we're into bashing people for thoughtless remarks, let's go for some humdingers.
Can anyone remember Jesse Jackson saying "hymietown" or Hillary Clinton saying "Jew b*****d" or Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante (D-CA) saying "n****r labor organization?"
And none of them said it at a hundred year old birthday party.
Byrd Never Apologized for Klan Membership
Critics of Sen. Trent Lott have spent the last 24-hours parsing the words of the series of apologies he has offered for praising Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1948 Dixiecrat presidential candidacy last week. But satisfactory or not, at least he did apologize, which is more than anyone can say about Senate Majority Whip Robert Byrd's comments regarding his Ku Klux Klan past.
"I apologize to anyone who was offended by my statement," Sen. Lott said, using the "a" word explicitly.
While Byrd did issue an apology last year for invoking the phrase "white niggers" during a nationally televised TV interview, the top Democrat has never expressed much personal contrition for his role as Ku Klux Klan Grand Kleagle in the 1930s.
In fact, as recently as nine years ago, Byrd explained that he joined the group that specialized in lynching African-Americans because it "offered excitement."
Though the West Virginia Democrat went on to tell the Washington Post in June 1993 that his stint in the KKK was the mistake in his life that he most regrets, he never acknowledged that the group's Jim Crow agenda had anything to do with his decision to sign up.
Instead, Byrd explained that he decided to become a cross-burning, night-riding, sheet-wearing member of the Klan because "it was strongly opposed to communism."
Twelve years earlier, in another interview with the Post, the West Virginia Democrat sounded anything but contrite when asked about his days as a Klansman.
"Suddenly, Byrd's face freezes," wrote Post reporter Martin Schram in May 1981. "The muscles on either side of his jaw harden to what must be the consistency of golf balls. His eyes are lasers burning deeply into his questioner."
"I really do not want to answer that question," the former Grand Kleagle glowered. "It is something I have addressed time and time again."
"He is tired of hearing about it," Schram wrote. "Tired of having to answer for it. It was just a mistake of youth, he goes on."
Finally, Byrd explained in testy tones, "Just as a lot of young people these days join organizations they regret joining, I joined as a youth and regretted it later. I made a mistake."
In a comprehensive Lexis-Nexis search through 32 years of media reports on Sen. Byrd's Klan past, NewsMax.com was unable to unearth a single quote where the top Democrat used the word "apology" or "apologize" - or where he strongly condemned the violent hate group in any way.
Byrd's strongest statement on the Klan was apparently delivered during the same 1981 Washington Post interview.
"I abhor the Klan," the Senate Democrat said. "Every time I see on television men wearing robes, it turns me off. I look upon the Klan as a silly, asinine group that tries to act outside the law, and uses violence and intimidation as their currency."
But Byrd's references throughout the years to the murderous hate group seem peppered with adjectives like "silly" and "asinine" rather than the stronger language one might expect about a group he claims to "abhor."
Nowhere among the top Democrat's Klan quotes could we find terms like "dangerous," "racist" or, for that matter, any reference whatsoever to the group's persecution of blacks.
Despite Byrd's not using words like "apology" and "apologize," his representatives have insisted that he has repeatedly made his "regrets" about his Klan days clear.
On several occasions the former Kleagle has talked about the "mistake" he made that will dog him for the rest of his days. Once he actually referred to joining the group of black-lynching racists as "a youthful mistake."
Still, as late as 1946, when Byrd was well into his adulthood at age 29, the politically ambitious West Virginian didn't seem particularly regretful about his "mistake."
"The Klan is needed today as never before," Byrd proclaimed in a letter to the KKK's Imperial Grand Wizard, the Post reported.
And if he truly "abhorred" his past "mistake," he didn't seem particularly eager to make amends when it came to the issue of integrating the armed forces under President Harry Truman.
In another letter written around the same time that was unearthed last year by columnist Michelle Malkin, Byrd vowed never to fight in the military "with a Negro by my side."
"I should rather die a thousand times and see old glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again," the ex-Klansman pledged, "than see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen of the wilds."
As Malkin also noted, 20 years after Byrd described African-Americans as "race mongrels," he spent 14 hours filibustering against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He also voted against Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, the only two blacks ever nominated for the U.S. Supreme Court.
And then, of course, there was last year's unfortunate "white nigger" reference.
Perhaps those complaining that Sen. Lott's explicit apology didn't quite meet their standards would do better to turn their attention to Sen. Byrd's lack of contrition for his enthusiastic membership in a group whose goal was the extermination of the black race.
"As we continue to inform and relay the true nature of the conservatism, his words will be used as ammunition against us for as long as he's present. We have to remove that round from the chamber."
I did not hear Lott's speech. But it sounds like he probably did not mean he was proud to support Thurmonds's campaign concerning segregation. He would be stupid to do so. However, having said that, he should have chosen his words more carefully and, for the sake of his party and conservatism, should resign. The author is correct, we need to diffuse this now. The only way he can make it right is to resign. Harsh, but I see no other option. As a politician, he should know to pick his words more carefully.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:32:59 AM PST
I hear him. Here is what he said "We wouldn't have some of the problems we have today if you had been elected President". That was it. That's all he said.
I HEARD him.
Keyes - a true patriot and conservative. The Republican party should be taking advantage of the wealth of knowledge this man has. Yep, interesting politics indeed! Keyes for President in 2008!
posted on 12/12/2002 4:38:01 AM PST
Bingo. They realize that the governor of Mississippi is a DemonRAT who will appoint a RAT to the seat.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:38:04 AM PST
Don't forget, Jackson spit into white people's food, either; Hannity reminded us of this yesterday on his show.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:43:52 AM PST
To: steveegg; mhking
They realize that the governor of Mississippi is a DemonRAT who will appoint a RAT to the seat.
That, in part, is what this is about....besides the attempt to alienate black voters from Republicans in 2004.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:45:40 AM PST
Don't know about y'all, but I'm already tired of this non-story. If the Republicans hold strong for a while and the Dems keep trying to "make this dog hunt", I can't see any outcome but the Dems losing more credibility with this childish ploy. Since no one will come out and accuse Lott of being a racist/segregationist, there is no rational reason to keep beating on this drum and the average American knows this.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:51:06 AM PST
That is not just "in part"; that's the entire aim of it. Care to guess how long it would take before a RINO leaps over to the DemonRAT caucus (if not the party itself) once the Senate becomes 50-50 again?
posted on 12/12/2002 4:55:15 AM PST
One more thing; the Project 21 folks know that the RATs know.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:56:19 AM PST
Frankly, I think the segregationist aspect of these comments are a gross extrapolation to begin with, and I'm no friend of Trent Lott anyway. But I think Rev. Peterson has it right: this is Democratic argle-bargle designed to bring down some Republican -- ANY Republican -- since they can't touch the president.
The GOP caucus in the Senate had the chance to find a new Majority Leader right after the election. Instead, they re-seated Lott. Now, if they fire him, the Democrats win; even if Lott leaves, the stain of "racism" will linger. If he stands and fights, the charge will surface again and again, despite the blatant hypocrisy of the Left and THEIR racist "champions."
The problem here is that Lott never should have been re-elected Senate Majority Leader.
posted on 12/12/2002 4:59:58 AM PST
I heard him too and that is not all he said.
posted on 12/12/2002 5:26:40 AM PST
I am glad to know that there are differing opinions within Project 21........ I hate "cookie cutter" statements..... this press release shows several different views and also shows you promote discussion within your organization.........
Thanks so much for the ping.......
Lott said the same damn thing in 1980. How many times does he have to say it before we say we believe him?
Has Lott said what problems he was talking about?
Nope. That's why I can't understand the uproar.
It because he hasn't. He believes that Thurmond's election would have taken care of problems we have today. What problems, Sen. Lott, and how would Thurmond have taken care of them?
The issue is that Lott defended a view that Thurmond won't even defend-- his candidacy for president in 1948.
He doesn't have to resign from the Senate, though no doubt the Dems would be delighted if he did. Lott simply has to step down as Majority Leader.
I think he was being nice. And in truth, he was smart enough NOT to say anything offensive. If Lott were a Democrat, we wouldn't be talking about this.
The uproar came about only after Mary Landrieu won to keep the Pubbie advantage at 51-49. It seems that there's a DemonRAT governor down in Mississippi, who would duly appoint a DemonRAT to Cave-A-Lott's seat if somehow he were ousted; and there's a RINO who would leap if it meant giving El Diablo D'Asshole an illegitimate majority again.
posted on 12/12/2002 6:41:41 AM PST
He doesn't have to resign from the Senate, though no doubt the Dems would be delighted if he did.
File that under N for "No <expletive deleted>, Sherlock." It would seem that they have one and only one RINO ready to leap if it meant giving El Diablo D'Asshole the majority, and the removal of Cave-A-Lott would do just that.
posted on 12/12/2002 6:44:20 AM PST
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
Yup. If they succeeded in getting Lott ousted from the Senate and got Lincoln Chaffee to go Indy along with Johnny Mc Insane, guess who would be Majority Leader again? The Dems are just licking their chops thinking about how to make it come true.
Of course he's not a racist. Lott just has a politically deaf tin ear.
The uproar came about only after Mary Landrieu won to keep the Pubbie advantage at 51-49.
Exactly. If Terrell had won, Jesse Jackson wouldn't have said a damn word.
This is about driving Trent Lott out of the Senate.
I can hear it now "If he's too racist to be a Majority Leader, he's too racist to be a Senator."
If Lott allows himself to be branded a racist by stepping down, he'll have to quit altogether, as Newt did, and as Livingston did.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT RACE, IT'S ABOUT POLITICS!
posted on 12/12/2002 6:48:01 AM PST
Actually, even with Cave-A-Lott around, having both Chafee Dish and McShame flip would give El Diablo D'Asshole an illegitimate majority again. Apparently, they can only get one of them.
posted on 12/12/2002 6:49:37 AM PST
Lott just has a politically deaf tin ear
And this has been well known for many years. Just look at previous posts (both mine and others) that describe Lott and incompetent to lead. Whether discussing taxes, spending, campaign finance reform....race...or any issue, he constantly fumbles the ball to the other team.
When we control the House, Senate, Presidency and Supreme Court, we should be on offense. It is a lot easier to score points on offense than defense. But Lott constantly creates a turnover and puts us on defense.
Bush and Hastert have to constantly adjust their game plan because of the known tendency of Lott to fumble the ball. In the locker room he may be a great teammate. But he is not the man to carry the ball in the game.
I'm tired of this crap about Lott. Too many people are twisting his words around and making him out to be a racist white boy.
Bullsh-t. Everybody knows what he was referring to with Thurmond's 1948 campaign, and it wasn't segregation. While I realize that he has to at least soothe some people, if I were him I wouldn't have even apologized for my remarks. I would have explained them instead. If that isn't good enough, then I wouldn't want your vote anyway.
Lott should remain Senate Majority Leader!
I think Lott will, right after Congress is in session again,decide to quietly resign the leadership.I think to do it NOW ,whilst the Commies , um,, er Democrats and their lapdogs demand it , would be counterproductive. Do I think Trent Lott screwed up? Yes. Do I think he has said enough about? Yes. Am I tickled McConell is now suggesting amendments to a censure call? You betcha.. I think that this tempest is about to VERY harshly rebound on the pot stirrers. What say you all?
I think Lott will, right after Congress is in session again,decide to quietly resign the leadership.
I don't think he has the common sense to go about it that way - plus I don't think the Dems (or those Republicans going after him) will let him. I'm guessing he'll be gone completely before the end of the week. And he'll have no one but himself to blame for handing the Senate back to the Dems.
posted on 12/15/2002 9:19:06 PM PST
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson