[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

[ibme]

There is a third party, jerking the chains of the stupids and the haters.

[anniegetyourgun]

I believe this could turn into a wonderful and lengthy thread if we are all required to provide examples of each. I'll go first.

Stupid leftist:

Satanic leftist:

[Johnny Shear]

What about those Leftist who simply believe the bible is a great novel? And think many on the "Religious Right" are pushing the middle east issue in an attempt to create the armageddon they so sorely need in order to justify their beliefs?

Or is only the Religious Left not stupid and not satanic?

And what about the non-religous Right? Satanic too?

[boop]

Excellent article!

[oyez]

Ex-C-Lent!-- BFL

[Whats-wrong-with-the-media?]

I wonder which catagory the author would place people like Karl Marx?

Joe Lieberman?

Diane Feinstein?

The Labour Party in Israel?

Stupid or Satanic?

Just wondering....

[THE POLELOCK]

PLEASE READ 1JOHN 2:18-19

[buffyt]

Excellent! My son and I discussed this matter. We wondered whether all leftists are evil and know that they have sold their souls to the devil... or if they are just greedy, looking out for themselves, not caring about anyone else. Do they know they are doing the work of the devil. Do they think they are just working for themselves. Either way, satan is happy to have them all.

[Gritty]

BTTT

[Irene Adler]

I have a few relatives of the "stupid left" variety; not sure I have ever really personally known a satanic leftist (would guess the satanic leftists are a much smaller group clustered in the "elite" of the left and therefore in its leadership).

My observation of my "stupid left" relatives is that they mostly want attention from others that recognizes them for being especially good and caring people. It's even a bit competitive on their parts: "I care more than you care, so I'm obviously better than you are." But, they do really, really crave attention. I suspect that a strong, chronic need for a certain kind of attention and recognition from others explains some of the stupid left's motivation.

[DBtoo]

Wonderful article, and so true!

[doug from upland]

Great read.

[Entropy Squared]

Liberals can be neatly pigeon-holed into the following four categories:

The Congenitally Stupid
The congenitally stupid segment of society are naturally drawn to liberalism. Liberalism is a philosophy that does not require, and in fact discourages, reasoned thought. Those who are incapable of reaching logical conclusions, or who find the simple relationship between cause and effect beyond their grasp, are natural followers of liberalism. Successful recruiting of the congenitally stupid by the liberals is often accomplished by uttering nothing more than a couple of inane platitudes.

The Uninformed
The uninformed are for the most part the mentally lazy and the unconcerned. These are also natural recruits to liberalism as they can be so easily led. They are the perfect sheep who the liberals only need to appeal to on an emotional level. The uninformed can easily be drawn to a philosophy that discourages the effort of logical thought.

The Misinformed
The largest group of liberals is the misinformed. They are for the most part motivated and intelligent enough to be aware of their surroundings and to have a rudimentary grasp of the some of the issues confronting society. Unfortunately they completely lack the intellectual integrity to logically investigate their own belief system. They are the preferred ovine breed of leaders like Hitler and Stalin.

The Truly Evil
The truly evil segment of liberals are those who completely understand the destructiveness of liberalism but continue to further its agenda. There is no fate too vile for this segment of society. Spending the rest of their lives in one of their philosophy’s most ringing successes, N. Korea for example, would be just a reward for those liberals who truly know what they do.