Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pram
No offense, but I'm curious...how do you know they were "fags"? And why would you recall it? Why would you think others care to know it? The subject is, afterall, anti-Semitism.
Am fascinated & stunned by the number of folks herein who seem so preoccupied w/a sexuality they claim to abhor.
11 posted on 12/17/2002 10:55:24 PM PST by nastypumps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: nastypumps
Yes, it is about anti-Semitism, but there is an interesting connection between homosexuality and anti-Semitism.... Many Nazi officers were homosexuals... the 'gay agenda" tactics planners originally used many Nazilike methods and even read Mein Kampf as a how-to text for inspiration..
And lastly, the "gay agenda" crowd want us to be "tolerant" of them, but they are the most intolerant of any group of people! Look at Canada's and the U.K.'s recent anti-"hate speech" laws. Homos can't tolerant anyone haven't a different viewpoint. Major censorship may be the outcome. Remind you of book burning?
Plus how can I tell? Have you ever lived in SF? Answer that first and then I'll tell you!
12 posted on 12/18/2002 9:08:03 AM PST by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: nastypumps
But, see, look, you have illustrated one aspect of why it is not really a good idea to make a political group of people based on their sexuality.

If people can opt in and opt out of the group at will, how are we supposed to know who is really "entitled" to the protections and privileges which are sought for the group?

I am reminded of two people I once heard discussing Michael Jackson, as they sat in an auto place and saw him come on TV. These people looked to me like they could have been brother and sister. The "sister" said, "Look at that queer!" The "brother" replied, "Now, look--how do YOU know he's a 'queer'? Do you peep in his windows?" The woman replied, "Well...come to think of it, how do I know YOU'RE a hetero?"

The woman's remark was rude, sure, in a public place. But I found the man's sanctimonious manner to be annoying, too. Entertainers WANT us to talk about them, it's how they make money.

And besides, everyone knows Michael probably is neither gay nor straight--he's allegedly into CHILDREN.

Also, it never ceases to amaze me how some homosexuals want us to notice them as a political voice, but then get all huffy when someone tries to simply use outward appearance to make a judgment about someone. We all use outward appearance to do this on a day-to-day basis, when dealing with strangers. To refuse to do so would be silly.
14 posted on 01/09/2003 4:25:24 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson