[doosee]

Setting up the technology as a voluntary option rather than as something mandatory would be more acceptable.

That may be the best way to get it started as a program. A safety feature offered by auto manufacturers and rental car outfits. The problem is a national monitoring system on a common standard would be required. Not sure if anyone other than Uncle Sam can do this...

[steve50]

You sound like the typical big government guy doosee. Let's just get some program started, then we can expand it to do what we really wanted all along. Programs like this are usually backed by the "for the children" crowd, you might not have better luck pushing this at DU.

[hoosierham]

Yeah, and SEAT BELTS were voluntary at first,but now non-use is enough to be stopped by law enforcement and heavily fined.Apparent non-compliance with the seat-belt law also allows the police to begin questioning and searching for other violations of law. What is against the law is not the same as what is an evil act. Also the citation can result in insurance rate increases.

You are no Freeper, you are a shill for a Nanny State.

Toss the unconstitutional laws that try to prevent Americans from defending themselves and their familiy and property , DON'T toss freedom and privacy.

[End Times Sentinel]

From your profile: The less government we have the better off we are.

You're just playing devil's advocate here, aren't you?

Owl_Eagle

" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"

[GirlShortstop]

....a national monitoring system on a common standard would be required. Not sure if anyone other than Uncle Sam can do this...    or Auntie Hillary.

Post #33  Believe me, I trust them and agree with what they want. The anti government, police haters on Free Republic speak for themselves by what they post.

You asked for opinions and now dissenters to your idea get painted with a broad brush of inconsiderate labels?  Not wise... do you wish you could retract that?

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

They already have this system! What do you mean only the government could do this? You are bordering on being idiotic.

[visualops]

The issue with that is those who wish to remain 'untagged' would eventually be penalized in a number of ways, mostly because of insurence.
Your car isn't tagged? Sorry, you can't park here.
Your car isn't tagged? Sorry, your insurance rates will be higher.
Your car isn't tagged? Sorry, neighborhood association has a rule, you can't live here.