Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man charged with contempt for obscene message on check
Daily Press and Argus ^ | 12-15-02 | Jon Zemke

Posted on 12/15/2002 4:22:30 PM PST by Dan from Michigan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: BenLurkin
1.12  Pecunia non olet. 
   pecunia, -ae.  property;  wealth, money. 
   oleo, -ere.  to emit an odor; to smell, stink. 

(source)

41 posted on 12/15/2002 6:58:10 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
My hero!
42 posted on 12/15/2002 7:21:12 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mckenzie
I myself have always received excellent treatment from officers of the law, but my best friend and my brother have not been so lucky. My best friend was stopped for going 5 mph over the limit (55 in a 50 zone) at 2 am, and ended locked up with her car impounded. She was in the middle of moving and was so, so tired. We bailed her out. Her fine ended up being exactly the amount of bail we had been told we'd get back when she showed up for trial. They kept every cent they got from us. Getting her car out cost her all of her assets. She's in no position to repay us now, so that's that. We were taxed for her speeding ticket, and don't even get to claim it when we file. She's hardly "dangerous criminal" material and was jailed, we think, because the officer found a letter opener in her car. Sometimes a letter opener is just a letter opener.

My brother was stopped just inside my state's border and locked in the back of the patrol car while the cop tossed his truck. He was accused of being drunk--but the cop backed down when my brother said, "Fine, test it." He questioned the cash my brother was carrying (does $250 sound excessive for interstate travel? from California to the heartland?) and thoroughly ransacked his luggage. The search took almost an hour. Now my brother probably shouldn't have consented to the search, Constitutionally speaking, since the officer never presented reason for having stopped him. But he didn't want to get his head bashed in, so he cooperated. He was on his way out to help me with a family medical emergency, and the time he lost and the fatigue created by anger really didn't help anything.

Obviously my brother or his truck resembled someone they were looking for. Boy was he mad. The cop not only didn't apologize, he made some smart remark about my brother's base permit, "Yeah, sure you were Navy, you probably stole that sticker."

I don't care for profanity, but I'm with those who say that this is not contempt of court. Contempt FOR the court, sure. Or rather, contempt for the system, that can make anyone a criminal at any time...whether a crime has been committed or not. If THAT is illegal, I too am a lawbreaker, I guess.
43 posted on 12/15/2002 7:27:38 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
About six months ago I wrote "For last night" on all my bills including my property tax bill.
44 posted on 12/15/2002 7:34:41 PM PST by Crispy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
In the movie "Three Kings" an Iraqi has an innovative hiding place for a secret map that US soldiers discover. That gives me an idea for the check I have to send in to the hellish 36th District Court in Detroit for $100. Got it after being found responsible (no way in hell would I ever plead guilty) for 50 in a 35 on an 8 - yes EIGHT - lane major artery, light traffic in an abandoned area of Detroit. The officious no-neck Revenue Enhancement Officer D. CLELAND at least had to miss a day of work like I did for his two cases.

Detroit is truly the vilest, most corrupt, filthiest and most filled with truly idiotic people of any city that I have ever lived in or near. I won't get into the bogus parking tickets issues at Wayne State University -- time stamped between 3 and 5 AM on weekend mornings, when I wasn't even there.

Once I finish at Wayne State, this hellhole of a town can rot for all I care. Back to Livingston County for me.
45 posted on 12/15/2002 7:47:01 PM PST by AK2KX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Since the note was written in the space designed for memoes to self and since the check writers could be speakers of any of the languages spoken on the planet, do you thing the gubmint has multilingual experts analyzing the contents of submitted checks, the way that applications for vanity license plates are analyzed? I mean, somebody could be writing messages INSULTING the Imperial City Clerk, in, I dunno, the Freedonian language?!
46 posted on 12/15/2002 7:52:36 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
thing=think, dummy!
47 posted on 12/15/2002 7:53:29 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AK2KX
Detroit is truly the vilest, most corrupt, filthiest and most filled with truly idiotic people of any city that I have ever lived in or near. I won't get into the bogus parking tickets issues at Wayne State University -- time stamped between 3 and 5 AM on weekend mornings, when I wasn't even there.

My brother went to school there. I have to agree. His brand new GT Mustang was stolen the second day he drove it. My dad went to check on the status of the investigation and saw policemen stripping parts off of cars at the impound lot. Interesting, isn't it?

48 posted on 12/15/2002 8:15:02 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AK2KX
Back to Livingston County for me.

Same here on a permanent basis when my lease in Least Lansing is up.

49 posted on 12/15/2002 8:16:24 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
If the ticket wasn't put on the windshield, how was it issued?

I believe it wasn't. I believe it is a revenue enhancement scam.

If the fine is increased for non-compliance because she was never informed of the ticket, I'd challenge it.

We will challenge it.

50 posted on 12/15/2002 8:21:15 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Thank you. I book-marked the source. (My Black's Law Dictionary leaves me guessing too often.)
51 posted on 12/15/2002 8:30:54 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
It's unknown how Pikkarainen discovered the check. His secretary said the judge wouldn't comment because the case is pending.

It's perfectly clear to me that since judges don't normally see checks, the one who should be held in comtempt is the mental midget who decided the judge should see it.

52 posted on 12/15/2002 8:51:04 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I suspect it was the second sentence ("Suck on it") that actually got the court's ire and gave them any grounds to pursue the contempt charge. Had the defendant merely written the first sentence alone, he probably would have gotten away with it.
53 posted on 12/16/2002 5:21:04 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson