Yeah, it takes such a scholar to read this section:
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
And figure out that it allows states to lawfully discriminate against someone based on race. I stand corrected and instead should be in awe of those men who found the penumbra, the exception in such otherwise clear and concise language.
Seriously, if that is considered "bright", I don't want any part of it. That's the same kind of nonsense that brought us Roe v. Wade and countless other crap decisions. It's funny how people will defend the destruction of clear Constitutional language when it fits their agenda, and then condemn it later when it doesn't.