Replies

Hank, here's a very short laundry list of some of the reasons that the Ohio State Board of Education found as they did, my list and not theirs, should anyone ask -- 300,000 species (read recently that number is now in the millions???) and zero to a few "transitional forms", all controversial (where are they, Evols?), the Cambrian Explosion (wholly unexplained, once the sophistry is duly dismissed), no established evolutionary mechanism (dismissing here the wholly laugable "chance" which is, in truth, non-science or anti-science).

These represent huge holes in the so-called theory. Add to that the immense complexity of the genetic code. Add to that failed abiogenesis. And on and on. I therefore conclude that Evolution is the last gasp of Failed 19th Century Materialism. It has become an anti-religion cult.

Please, Please, Evols, show me one species that has demonstrably, provably transformed into another, either in the fossil record or in the lab. Note that the key words here are "demonstrably" and "provably". Speculation is not invited.

They cannot do it, Hank. Evolution is bogus science. The Ohio State Board of Science has seen the evidence and they have opened the door. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Others will agree.

So I guess the theory of relativity is bogus then as well?

That is the basic premise you are laying out you know?

Interesting, facts as myth and myths as fact. I find it so amusing.

Creationists are getting pretty desperate, biologists and geneticists use the Theory of evolution in their work all the time. You should probably tell them how wrong they are.

People that study germs and virus's use the Theory of evolution as well, better tell them too.

99% of scientists agree and back up the theory of evolution, you better tell them that they are all wrong as well.

Any scientist that claims that God did something, ID theory, Creationism etc is a LAZY scientist. In other words, he cannot explain what happened, therefore he falls back on the, "I can't explain it, therefore god must have done it", when a scientist does this, he is NO longer a scientist, he is a philosopher.

God cannot be proven, nor disproven, therefore to use him/her/it is NOT scientific by definition. It is philosophy or religion. Science can only use cold hard facts, and since God is not a "fact", he cannot be used by science.