So I guess the theory of relativity is bogus then as well?
That is the basic premise you are laying out you know?
No, it's not. Relativity superceded and encompassed Newton's laws, and the physicists back their theories with the math and constant experiment. They respect truth and will always bow to experimental result. Relativity has again and again been confirmed by reality with certain quantum mechanical exceptions, which turn out to be major.
Contrast that with Darwinism which is contradicted by reality; i.e. no transformation of species one into another, species breeding true for millions of years reflecting stasis not change, no transition mechanism, no clear definitions, lies told to our children in public school and on and on. In recent years the leading proponents of Evolution were Dawkins, first and foremost an atheist (ask him) and Gould, a sophist and at one time a heavy promoter of "chance" as the primary Evolutionary engine, which is flat ludicrous.
Egro, relativity is good science, Darwinism is bogus science. It is a religious cult masquerading as science.
Interesting, facts as myth and myths as fact. I find it so amusing.
BS -- you amuse me.
Creationists are getting pretty desperate...
Category Think. Kindly point to the Creationism in any of my posts. I'm arguing science.
... biologists and geneticists use the Theory of evolution in their work all the time. You should probably tell them how wrong they are.
Read the article. Scientific criticisms are permitted, not "Creationist" criticisms. Lots of scientists, an increasing number, do not agree with Evolution.
People that study germs and virus's use the Theory of evolution as well, better tell them too.
Silly nonsense.
99% of scientists agree and back up the theory of evolution ...
More BS. Back this up, if you can (you cannot).
"I can't explain it, therefore god must have done it."
Show me in any of my posts, ever, where I make anything like this claim. FYI I've been posting on this subject for several years. You may want to do a little, or more than a little, research before you make these grand, encompassing, and grandly wrong, statements.
God cannot be proven, nor disproven, therefore to use him/her/it is NOT scientific by definition. It is philosophy or religion. Science can only use cold hard facts, and since God is not a "fact", he cannot be used by science.
Nonsense to this, as well. Western Science gestated within the womb of Christianity and its initial mission was to explore and better understand God. If God is not a reality, please explain to me the origin of the deep order and beauty we see all around us daily. The physical laws so laboriously discovered by science arose by chance? Now THAT is blindness of the first magnitude. Read The Physics of Consciousness and you will find God in more places than the underlying order of the Universe and Newton's laws, which were His laws first.
Now Aric, read this carefully because I am not going to be repeating myself again and again if you go off-point.