Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rmlew
OK, back to your original point (post 200), specifically #2

After 9/11, GW was on the war path of OBL. Every news item, White House press conference was peppered with references to the 'evil one'. Six months later we are told that OBL is no longer important (despite no evidence of his demise) and now we have another distraction, that (originally U.S. sponsored) punch bag - Saddam Hussein. I therefore feel a certain amount of manipulaton of public opinion is going on and am starting to have severe doubts as to whether Arabs or any other facet of Islam had anything to do with 9/11 to begin with (if you're being truly objective, doubts must begin to surface). I realize this may not be a popular opinion (tin foil, etc.) as the Arab theory sits much better with the pre-existing opinions that one already has about Arabs, but then that's the problem with pre-existing bias, it blinds you to exploring alternative explanations.

207 posted on 12/17/2002 3:09:31 PM PST by droberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: droberts
>>I therefore feel a certain amount of manipulaton of public opinion is going on and am starting to have severe doubts as to whether Arabs or any other facet of Islam had anything to do with 9/11 to begin with

OK, let's see.

Operation Northwoods with GlobalHawk Remote Control Technology.....

Osama as a WITTING tool of the CIA....

Unknown unnamed secret cabal working for the Bushes....

Mossad....

UFO's.....Greys/Grays/Reptoids/Nordics

Leprechauns.....

Ollie North?

210 posted on 12/17/2002 3:13:26 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: droberts
So you're saying the jews caused 911? And that's why they all got phone calls saying to stay home that day?
213 posted on 12/17/2002 3:16:20 PM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: droberts
Oh isn't this cute?
First Dr. Roberts claims victimhood status for the attackers, then he blames the attack on Israeli policies, and now he claims 9-11 was not done by AL-Qaeda.

Are you a Neo-nazi or sympathyser, an Islamist or sympathyser, or an America and Jew hating leftist? I don't have enough information to tell which yet. (Is't it sad that these groups overlap so much)

After 9/11, GW was on the war path of OBL. Every news item, White House press conference was peppered with references to the 'evil one'.
Perhaps you missed the Al-Jazeera tapes where both Bin Laden and his right-hand man, Al Zawaheeri claimed AL-Qaeda's responsibiility?

Six months later we are told that OBL is no longer important (despite no evidence of his demise) and now we have another distraction, that (originally U.S. sponsored) punch bag - Saddam Hussein

1. Saddam was also sponsored by the USSR.
2. Who says that OBL is unimportant.
Just because mass murderer A is on the loose doesn't mean taht we cant go after B is we can find only B.

I therefore feel a certain amount of manipulaton of public opinion is going on and am starting to have severe doubts as to whether Arabs or any other facet of Islam had anything to do with 9/11 to begin with (if you're being truly objective, doubts must begin to surface). I realize this may not be a popular opinion (tin foil, etc.) as the Arab theory sits much better with the pre-existing opinions that one already has about Arabs, but then that's the problem with pre-existing bias, it blinds you to exploring alternative explanations.

Yes folks, Counterpunch, the Nation, Z-magazine, and not taking your meds properly does rot your brain.

218 posted on 12/17/2002 3:31:01 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson