Skip to comments.
Stock Market Crashes Are Predictable, Major Decline Is Coming In 2003 And 2004, Says UCLA Physicist
Science Daily ^
| 12-17-2002
| UCLA
Posted on 12/17/2002 8:40:20 AM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: Maelstrom
Ah yes, the "I don't have facts, so accuse the opponent of sinister motives" tactic.
How very Democratic of you.
41
posted on
12/17/2002 1:58:44 PM PST
by
Tauzero
To: Tauzero
I apologize, was there something sinister in what I said?
HAHAHAHA!!!!
I don't have a horse in this race, friend. I merely suggest that your or I can make predictions just as well as this guy's claims.
I wasn't even aware he was an opponent.
Statistical analysis of the stock market cannot predict the social, regulatory, and economic factors that form the market economy.
To: blam
everyone has a mouth and an opinion
To: Tauzero
"I know you meant to imply some difference, but the behavior of mobs is at least partly understood -- and quantifiable."There was a thread on this [PDF] once. Interesting.
44
posted on
12/17/2002 2:05:06 PM PST
by
toenail
To: Maelstrom
Statistical analysis of the stock market cannot predict No, but statistics shows the world will end in 231 years. There is a name associated with that result that I don't remember anymore.
To: RightWhale
"No, but statistics shows the world will end in 231 years. There is a name associated with that result that I don't remember anymore."
Gott & Leslie's Doomsday Argument, I believe...
46
posted on
12/17/2002 3:58:02 PM PST
by
NukeMan
To: Maelstrom
On the contrary, the stock market is the best single leading indicator of all three.
47
posted on
12/17/2002 4:03:52 PM PST
by
Tauzero
To: blam
The sky
is falling. She told me so.
To: Tauzero
HAHAHAHA
Ok...there's this thing called CAUSE and another called EFFECT.
Don't make my milk come out my nose again, please.
To: Maelstrom
One ought not to confuse correlation with cause.
50
posted on
12/17/2002 9:16:06 PM PST
by
Tauzero
To: Tauzero
True.
I'll be more explicit.
Societal happenings, regulations, and production (among other economic factors) affect the market.
There is some feedback from the market back to those three primary drivers, but that does not mean it's mere correlation.
When people popularly view the market as a driver for the other three, you wind up with a false "bubble" which needs the correction that has been happening beginning about 6 months before we were freed from The Clinton.
To: Maelstrom
"Societal happenings, regulations, and production (among other economic factors) affect the market."
True.
"There is some feedback from the market back to those three primary drivers, but that does not mean it's mere correlation."
Fortunately for me, I didn't claim it was mere correlation.
Try reading my post again before shooting your mouth off.
52
posted on
12/18/2002 7:01:34 AM PST
by
Tauzero
To: Poohbah
Sorry I missed your reply yesterday.
"Elliot Wave theorists always predict doomsday."
You are probably making that judgement from a small sample of practitioners over a relatively short period of time. a.k.a. ignorance.
53
posted on
12/18/2002 8:06:52 AM PST
by
Tauzero
To: Poohbah
But in point of fact the professor here is not an Elliott guy, so your post 40 is not at all relevant.
54
posted on
12/18/2002 8:08:27 AM PST
by
Tauzero
To: blam
Anybody can build a stock prediction theory that predicts prior events.
It's that "future predicting" one that's so tricky.
55
posted on
12/18/2002 8:15:24 AM PST
by
dead
To: blam
Sornette has developed algorithms I thought that was one of Al Gore's inventions.
To: ConservativeDude
Which is sort of like why all the Y2K prediction folks were correct all along?
Well, considering that they all believed the problem was intractable and would lead to mass starvations, global technological failure, a militant crackdown by the government, and years of global anarchy, I would say correct is not the appropriate term.
"Nutty" might be more accurate. Or perhaps the less inflammatory "alarmist."
57
posted on
12/18/2002 8:20:02 AM PST
by
dead
To: ThomasJefferson
Spoken by someone who just demonstrated they know nothing about it. Well that's ok. I just hope you are not invested in stocks next year.
To: Doctor Stochastic
To: blam
Sornette and Zhou predict the Standard & Poor's 500 (currently above 900) will begin dropping by the second quarter of 2003 and will fall to approximately 700 in the first half of 2004. When they re-mortage their homes, take ALL savings, and borrow to their limits AND then BUY PUTS, I'll take them more seriously.
60
posted on
12/18/2002 8:43:49 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson