You would need a license to purchase and use any recreational drug gun (alcohol and tobacco included) (deer rifles and duck guns included). Much the same as you need a license to operate a car.
To obtain a license, you would be required to have health mental health insurance. This puts the health burden on the user, not the common citizen.
You would be required to read the latest literature regarding the known dangers of the drug guns and sign a release form. This puts the legal responsibility on the user.
All employers and health insurers of the user would be notified. Thus the financial burden is on the user. owner Employers would have to make their policy known for each type of drug gun before the user owner applies for a license though. The employer would have the right to continue the user's owners employment or not, based upon previously stated policy.
The license applicant would then pay some small administrative fee to process the application (like what is done for a drivers license). The benefit to the user owner is that he would be able to go to a licensed dealer, purchase the drugs Gun for much less than the cost from an illegal dealer, with better quality, and without fear of prosecution.
The restrictions of the license may vary from drug to drug gun to gun. Some of the harder drugs semi-automatic guns may restrict usage to personal residences only. Tobacco duck guns may have the fewest restrictions - just don't give it to minors
. Violation of the license would be a felony.
Why a license? Responsible users gun owners will have no problem with this. The burden of use will be all theirs. Problem users owners will be locked away for a long time. The illegal market then dries up.
Brilliant, moron. But you dreamed this up yourself? You should be nationally syndicated.