Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texaggie79
So, while you may have remedied the supply side, killing off the cartels and giving the job of production over to corporations, you INCREASE the motivation of users and non users to use MORE.

I don't see that as a good thing.

Just like ending Prohibition reduced the disincentives of alcohol users. Was that a good thing? If not, should Prohibition have been continued?

And why should I, a non-drug-user, have to pay---in tax dollars, a justice system corupted by drug money, and increased threat from drug-turf wars---to "protect" others from their own weaknesses?

12 posted on 12/17/2002 10:06:55 AM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MrLeRoy
Because that "weakness" if allowed to go unchallenged will endanger you and yours far more than some hoodlums on the other side of town.
20 posted on 12/17/2002 10:29:21 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson