[Texaggie79]

Just a few posts ago you were defending the federal narcotics acts.

Only defending why it was done. I never said it was constitutional.

[tpaine]

I know you want to make this a "It's my damn body, I'll do what I want." issue, but that only goes as far as the FED.

Thus, -- you now admit that our constitution protects us from federal efforts to ban substances?
How inconsistant can you get? Just a few posts ago you were defending the federal narcotics acts.

Only defending why it was done. I never said it was constitutional.

Very well, you admit to defending unconstitutional acts.

Thank you.

[tpaine]

I know you want to make this a "It's my damn body, I'll do what I want." issue, but that only goes as far as the FED.

Thus, -- you now admit that our constitution protects us from federal efforts to ban substances?
How inconsistant can you get? Just a few posts ago you were defending the federal narcotics acts.

Only defending why it was done. I never said it was constitutional.

Very well, you admit to defending unconstitutional acts.

Thank you.

Shut up.... I never said I supported it.
171 posted on 12/17/2002 2:02 PM PST by Texaggie79

I should 'shut up' about your admitted defense of unconstitutional acts?
-- I'd say your irrational denial of not 'supporting' acts you defend is worth speaking about on a site dedicated to defending the constitution.