Get real. Your know that stupidity has been discussed at lengths greater than anyone could imagine. The discussions always evolve into stupid scenarios like I mentioned, thus making it futile for anyone to talk sensibly about the topic with you. You always compare crack use with a neighbor pointing a gun right at you. Then it becomes, "well not
right at me ,but in my direction". Its silly scenarios that are not reality.
Where has someone figured out EXACTLY when a threat is valid enough to be a violation of our rights.
What is this "valid enough"? If you have a problem, and think your rights have been violated, then take the person to court. You can then try to convince a jury of intent, which is the only area where your "valid enough" question is raised.
The jury is the voters in each state. Go see what they think....