Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Christmas Should Be More Commercial
Ayn Rand Institute ^ | 12/17/02 | Leonard Peikoff

Posted on 12/19/2002 4:25:06 PM PST by RJCogburn

Christmas in America is an exuberant display of human ingenuity, capitalist productivity, and the enjoyment of life. Yet all of these are castigated as "materialistic"; the real meaning of the holiday, we are told, is assorted Nativity tales and altruist injunctions (e.g., love thy neighbor) that no one takes seriously.

In fact, Christmas as we celebrate it today is a 19th-century American invention. The freedom and prosperity of post Civil War America created the happiest nation in history. The result was the desire to celebrate, to revel in the goods and pleasures of life on earth. Christmas (which was not a federal holiday until 1870) became the leading American outlet for this feeling.

Historically, people have always celebrated the winter solstice as the time when the days begin to lengthen, indicating the earth's return to life. Ancient Romans feasted and reveled during the festival of Saturnalia. Early Christians condemned these Roman celebrations—they were waiting for the end of the world and had only scorn for earthly pleasures. By the fourth century the pagans were worshipping the god of the sun on December 25, and the Christians came to a decision: if you can't stop 'em, join 'em. They claimed (contrary to known fact) that the date was Jesus' birthday, and usurped the solstice holiday for their Church.

Even after the Christians stole Christmas, they were ambivalent about it. The holiday was inherently a pro-life festival of earthly renewal, but the Christians preached renunciation, sacrifice, and concern for the next world, not this one. As Cotton Mather, an 18th-century clergyman, put it: "Can you in your consciences think that our Holy Savior is honored by mirth? . . . Shall it be said that at the birth of our Savior . . . we take time . . . to do actions that have much more of hell than of heaven in them?"

Then came the major developments of 19th-century capitalism: industrialization, urbanization, the triumph of science—all of it leading to easy transportation, efficient mail delivery, the widespread publishing of books and magazines, new inventions making life comfortable and exciting, and the rise of entrepreneurs who understood that the way to make a profit was to produce something good and sell it to a mass market.

For the first time, the giving of gifts became a major feature of Christmas. Early Christians denounced gift-giving as a Roman practice, and Puritans called it diabolical. But Americans were not to be deterred. Thanks to capitalism, there was enough wealth to make gifts possible, a great productive apparatus to advertise them and make them available cheaply, and a country so content that men wanted to reach out to their friends and express their enjoyment of life. The whole country took with glee to giving gifts on an unprecedented scale.

Santa Claus is a thoroughly American invention. There was a St. Nicholas long ago and a feeble holiday connected with him (on December 5). In 1822, an American named Clement Clarke Moore wrote a poem about a visit from St. Nick. It was Moore (and a few other New Yorkers) who invented St. Nick's physical appearance and personality, came up with the idea that Santa travels on Christmas Eve in a sleigh pulled by reindeer, comes down the chimney, stuffs toys in the kids' stockings, then goes back to the North Pole.

Of course, the Puritans denounced Santa as the Anti-Christ, because he pushed Jesus to the background. Furthermore, Santa implicitly rejected the whole Christian ethics. He did not denounce the rich and demand that they give everything to the poor; on the contrary, he gave gifts to rich and poor children alike. Nor is Santa a champion of Christian mercy or unconditional love. On the contrary, he is for justice—Santa gives only to good children, not to bad ones.

All the best customs of Christmas, from carols to trees to spectacular decorations, have their root in pagan ideas and practices. These customs were greatly amplified by American culture, as the product of reason, science, business, worldliness, and egoism, i.e., the pursuit of happiness.

America's tragedy is that its intellectual leaders have typically tried to replace happiness with guilt by insisting that the spiritual meaning of Christmas is religion and self-sacrifice for Tiny Tim or his equivalent. But the spiritual must start with recognizing reality. Life requires reason, selfishness, capitalism; that is what Christmas should celebrate—and really, underneath all the pretense, that is what it does celebrate. It is time to take the Christ out of Christmas, and turn the holiday into a guiltlessly egoistic, pro-reason, this-worldly, commercial celebration.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This article was posted two years ago, but that thread is locked.

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a3e77d23d06.htm

1 posted on 12/19/2002 4:25:06 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
It's still misguided.

The problem with Christmas is a religious holiday has been removed of its religious meaning.

Rand wished for more of this.

Bah. Humbug.
2 posted on 12/19/2002 4:27:56 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Rand was a moron, so were her followers.
3 posted on 12/19/2002 4:49:48 PM PST by nofriendofbills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
What a well-written article. Peikoff has such a good mind. You may not agree with him, but he always has something original to say. I believe that there is too much guilt about living these days. Every pleasurable activity is being attacked by some PC statist who wants to tell everyone else how to live. I hope they leave Christmas alone. After all, it's one holiday that people enjoy whether religious or not.
4 posted on 12/19/2002 4:50:53 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
The charming aspect of Christmas is the fact that it expresses good will in a cheerful, happy, benevolent, non-sacrificial way.

-Ayn Rand
December, 1976
5 posted on 12/19/2002 4:56:19 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nofriendofbills
Rand was a moron, so were her followers.

Rand had no followers. It is also not common for morons to emigrate to another country, learn a new language, and make a living writing in Hollywood in the new language. So maybe she wasn't really a moron.

6 posted on 12/19/2002 5:03:19 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
can you 'splain the meaning of the "non-sacrificial way" comment?
7 posted on 12/19/2002 5:06:32 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Christmas in America is an exuberant display of human ingenuity, capitalist productivity, and the enjoyment of life.
and for Christians the birth of Christ.

I don't think the world seeing a this massive celibration is all that bad. Yes, it's capitalistic but it's up to the individual Christian to keep it holy.

I think it presents Christianity to the world as a religion that honors life. A religion that respects giving to others.

I live in a very multiethnic area and gift giving this time of year crosses all cultures and religions. I've seen Jews, Hindus and Buddist participate and enjoy it. It's become a "do unto others" holiday. If capitalism benefits, so be it. (That's not so bad, at all.)

8 posted on 12/19/2002 5:11:48 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
"Early Christians denounced gift-giving as a Roman practice, and Puritans called it diabolical.

Somehow that doesn't surprise me.

9 posted on 12/19/2002 5:25:34 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
"Early Christians denounced gift-giving as a Roman practice, and Puritans called it diabolical."

Hmmmmm.....can I be a Puritan? I am withdrawing, albeit slowly, from the heavy commercialization of Christmas....but it is hard to explain to children and grandchildren.

10 posted on 12/19/2002 5:53:23 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn

On NOW at RadioFR!

Join John Bender and …WISH MERRY CHRISTMAS TO OUR MEN IN UNIFORM! Call 866-RadioFR!

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep!

Click HERE to chat in the RadioFR chat room!

Miss a show?

Click HERE for RadioFR Archives!

11 posted on 12/19/2002 5:53:41 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizma
You're right. Christmas is for everyone.
12 posted on 12/19/2002 5:55:35 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
read later
13 posted on 12/19/2002 6:08:46 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; Jerry_M; RnMomof7
Blow the horn sister, if you please.
14 posted on 12/19/2002 6:23:52 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; JHavard; Havoc; OLD REGGIE; Iowegian; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; TrueBeliever9; ...
Bumped ..for discussion
15 posted on 12/19/2002 6:48:11 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
I do not disagree with most of this...But I love the season:>)
16 posted on 12/19/2002 6:50:02 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
can you 'splain the meaning of the "non-sacrificial way" comment?

I think she is saying that we can demonstrate good will without being self-sacrificial....a definition for her of altruism. She is referring to the idea that we have no moral duty to sacrifice ourselves for the good of others, or that such self-sacrifice is a good thing or a value.

At least that is how I take it.

17 posted on 12/19/2002 7:17:45 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
ah, yes, thank you, that fits. I think you're right, your explanation rings true with her philosophy.

I think she was a lead beyond the culture of her origin, and very good as far as it went.

But I think she missed a deeper foundation which left her philosophy needlessly shallow. Still, she's been a factor in many's growth at a certain stage (so long as they do not stop there.)

thanks very much for helping me understand the meaning of her statement.
18 posted on 12/20/2002 5:16:59 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
* a lead beyond = a leap beyond
19 posted on 12/20/2002 5:18:05 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins; Kerberos; RJCogburn
goodnesswins;Kerberos;RJCogburn

"Early Christians denounced gift-giving as a Roman practice, and Puritans called it diabolical."

Hmmmmm.....can I be a Puritan? I am withdrawing, albeit slowly, from the heavy commercialization of Christmas....but it is hard to explain to children and grandchildren.

10 posted on 12/19/2002 6:53 PM MST by goodnesswins


The early Reformers avoided the Pagan holiday of the Roman church.

The Christmas celebration was outlawed in the early colonies as a pagan ritual of the Roman church.

The Congregationalists, Baptists, Presbyterians and Puritans all condemned the celebration.

As late as the 1890s it was preached against by Charles Spurgeon.

There is no scriptural support for Jesus' birth occurring on the Pagan festival of Mithras ( the Sun of god).

If you search the Word of G-d you will see that Jesus was conceived
on the Festival of Dedication ( when the "Light of the World" entered the world).
He was most likely born on the Feast of Succoth( feast of Booths or feast of Tabernacles)
when the Jews enter their temporary dwellings
( which must be constructed such that you must be able to see the stars at night )

Acts 17:11 Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the
Thessalonians, for they received the message with great
eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if
what Paul said was true.

chuck <truth@YeshuaHaMashiach>

20 posted on 12/20/2002 8:06:27 AM PST by Uri’el-2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson