Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Old Hoosier
Your implication that conservatives cannot or should not "profit" from abortions or they should be disqualified from office.

News flash, Mr. Old Hoosier. Anyone who owns a mutual fund (health sector or index) that invests in hospital chains or HMO's already profits, in a sense, from abortions.

You can stretch the logic indefinitely. For example, owning a construction firm that built an office building in which a doctor resides can said to have been profiting from abortion.

A band-aid company profited from abortions because, dontcha know, those abortion doctors had to use a lot of band-aids.

The argument is ridiculous on its face, I'm afraid.

(By the way, my dad was a big Hoosier, coming from Berne and Geneva area of Indiana. We saw the University of Indiana play in the Rose Bowl in 1968, the year OJ Simpson played for USC)
403 posted on 12/20/2002 8:54:18 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: dyno35
For example, owning a construction firm that built an office building in which a doctor resides can said to have been profiting from abortion.

The man owns more than $5 m in the stock of an abortion provider, yet says he's pro-life. That doesn't make you wonder at all? Or are you just going to bend over because he's Dubya's pick?

414 posted on 12/20/2002 9:07:00 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson