Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: america-rules
While in the military during the Cold War, I crossed East German checkpoints going to and from East Berlin. The Vopos were less intrusive than the putzes at U.S. airports. The only people who are singled out for multiple searches are people who are absolutely no threat. Bin Laden could breeze through security like a head of state carrying a suitcase atom bomb.

Obviously, losing one's temper at a paramilitary checkpoint is a disastrous turn of events. But it's not necessary to misbehave to have the most unpleasant experience of one's life, if one hasn't inprocessed at a penal facility. All that's necessary is to fly commercially often enough and to be unlucky. The odds are not in one's favor.

Flying commercially is the most unpleasant experience in life, with the chance of a felony arrest or death as an added fillip. I flew 150,000 miles a year prior to 9-11. I don't fly commercially any more. If I can't fly private aviation, take a train or drive, I don't go there.





21 posted on 12/21/2002 12:22:39 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
Well, frankly, this is what happens when you take incompetents and give them lifetime federal employment. If anyone it is to blame, other than these particular nitwits, it is Little Tommy Daschle, who insisted that all airline security jobs should be federalized, and President Bush, for going along with him rather than fighting it.
22 posted on 12/21/2002 12:23:04 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
I cannot think of a man alive who would not be upset if his pregnant wife was crying saying an airport employee touched her breasts and was made to lift her clothing in front of a crowd.

I could. Alan Colmes.
23 posted on 12/21/2002 12:24:08 PM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Whether he was right to be upset is not the point. He undoubtedly was human to be upset, and maybe rightfully so.

Was his wife's baby breech because he was upset? This guy wants to make it seem like it is about her, but it isn't. He threw a temper tantrum in an airport and got arrested, and that is what is ticking him off. I can sympathize with his upset, unless I sense he is using his wife's breech pregnancy as a ploy for more sympathy. He exaggerated, and lost me in the process.
24 posted on 12/21/2002 12:24:47 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: motzman
LMAO! I said.....MAN! Not so sure about Alan on that one.... :o
25 posted on 12/21/2002 12:28:04 PM PST by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham; aculeus; general_re; Poohbah; chookter
So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

Would Mr. Monahan care to repeat that, under penalty of perjury? It doesn't pass my smell test.

26 posted on 12/21/2002 12:28:32 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motzman
BossLady specified a MAN, so Alan Colmes is out.
27 posted on 12/21/2002 12:35:31 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Seems to me a fake pregnancy would be an easy way to smuggle things onto a plane. How would security detect a "bambino bomb" from a real pregnancy without some kind of inspection?
28 posted on 12/21/2002 12:35:59 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
By all means, ignore the Gestapo part and get to the bottom of that breech delivery part!
29 posted on 12/21/2002 12:36:49 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
I've done a lot of flying since 9/11, and Portland security was by far the toughest and rudest. (I was there last weekend) I've learned to travel(dress) with no metal objects, and usually breeze right through the metal detector. Theirs was way more sensitive, and I was forced to endure a more extensive search. The guy searching me was kind of rude, and kept putting his hands in rather personal places without warning. (Many ask permisson first). As was the case this time, I almost always get visibly angry the longer the search continues.

These security people are going to have to realize that what they do, and how they do it, will cause normally reasonable travelers to become angry and impatient, and take responsibility for these kinds of incidences.

BTW, I would've reacted the same, or worse, to a pregnant wife.

30 posted on 12/21/2002 12:40:28 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
Give the goons a permanent job, a badge, and a gubbamint pension.
Only in America.
31 posted on 12/21/2002 12:40:47 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
As someone who flies frequently, I can relate and somewhat sympathize with this story. With that said, I can't help but feel the guys' whole life (and his wife's) would be a lot less dramatic if he learned how to control himself a little more.
32 posted on 12/21/2002 12:41:16 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
"Flying commercially is the most unpleasant experience in life, with the chance of a felony arrest or death as an added fillip. I flew 150,000 miles a year prior to 9-11. I don't fly commercially any more. If I can't fly private aviation, take a train or drive, I don't go there.
"

Utter nonsense. Flying commercially can't hold a candle to being in an auto accident, being mugged, being raped, or an entire list of things that are far worse experiences. I fly a heckuva lot, and continue to do so. I've had my share of being pulled aside for screening in recent months. I find it mildly annoying, and that's it. It takes some extra time, but I have always allowed extra time at airports.

As for the wife in question being touched...that should have been done behind a screen...most definitely. I had one security guy run the back of his hand across the front of my pants, after he told me he was going to do it. I see little difference there, frankly. No doubt the woman was felt up by another woman. No big deal, even if mildly annoying.

To blow these checks out of proportion and claim they are the worst experience in life is to be ridiculous. Try catching viral encephalitis on a cross-country road trip and spending two weeks in a hospital nowhere near where you live. That happened to me. It was far, far worse than being screened at an airport.

Exaggeration does nothing to solve the problem. We need to protest unwarranted intrusions into our lives, but we need not exaggerate their significance.

33 posted on 12/21/2002 12:42:25 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
That this happened in Portland is getting to be typical lately. The federal screeners exhibited what looks like idiot-newbie lack of training, but the real villains of this account were the local cops who, true to their lefty Oregon milieu, took it upon themselves to treat a customer complaint as a major felony.

Do Oregonians believe that letting people complain at the airport might lead to pumping gas?

34 posted on 12/21/2002 12:42:32 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
These security people are going to have to realize that what they do, and how they do it, will cause normally reasonable travelers to become angry and impatient, and take responsibility for these kinds of incidences.

Why would these drop-out wannabe SS care or take responsibility? You get angry or impatient at them, they just snap their fingers and off you go to the gulag.

35 posted on 12/21/2002 12:47:28 PM PST by AK2KX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Well, I fly alot, about every two weeks and I have uniformly had polite encounters with security. When I have been screened they are so polite the screening is useless. They barelly touch me and act embarassed to be doing so. Now they don't smile and chat, they are businesslike and never hassle me. And I am sure that if the lady asked, they would go behind a screen. There are always screens at the airports I go to. So I don't get this. So they touched her breasts, big deal {but then I remember when I was pregnant not being so sensitive about it, anyone who ever had a baby knows utter strangers come up and feel the baby and you can't have a baby and preserve modesty}. So he sounds like he went off when she cried. Lesson for ladies,,try not to cry at security when your husband has a tendancy to go ballistic. He is a collosal whiner.
36 posted on 12/21/2002 12:49:05 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
BossLady specified a MAN, so Alan Colmes is out.

Hmm...no wonder his..er, her name came immediatley to mind. He sure is an ugly lady...
37 posted on 12/21/2002 12:49:48 PM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
Why would any woman want to travel by plane when she's 7 1/2 months pregnant? Apparently some guy's wedding in Las Vegas was more important to them than endangering the child. They made that choice long before going to the airport. Flying in the last tri-mester is generally not recommended for good reasons.
38 posted on 12/21/2002 12:50:21 PM PST by Chico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Sure, assuming that the house is being custom-built for you. What about spec houses? PEX may be the best thing since sliced bread...I don't know, frankly, having been out of the business for some years. But...it also may not be. I remember when the same arguments were used for CVPC for hot water piping. Turned out that that stuff was crap, and even possibly toxic. Try replumbing a house if you want some real expensive hassles. If I were buying a spec house, I would not buy it if it had any plastic pipe in the walls. I'd ask, then walk if it was there. Copper will last a lifetime. Should the government be telling us what goes into our houses? Well, it's been doing that for many decades. Building codes are just that. No doubt there are things in there that shouldn't be, but the idea is good. Frankly, you have no idea what's inside the walls of a spec house. You can't see inside the walls. Without properly-enforced building codes, you would not believe what would pass for construction standards. The government has a role in this.
39 posted on 12/21/2002 12:50:24 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
Hopefully, one day "Alan" will get pregnant, and we'll be spared his spew for a few months...
40 posted on 12/21/2002 12:51:29 PM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson