Skip to comments.
THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK - HILLARY
Myself
| 12-21-2002
| Muleboy
Posted on 12/21/2002 12:28:40 PM PST by muleboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-245 next last
To: Timesink
MSNBC is just now reporting that Ms. Hillary is now the frontrunner in the Democratic primaries.
Well, she can always say she was *asked,* sort of like the Menendez brothers asking for mercy from the court because they were orphans.
21
posted on
12/21/2002 12:50:48 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: muleboy; Alamo-Girl; onyx; SpookBrat; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; dixiechick2000; ...
THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK - HILLARY
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.
To: muleboy
As I was able to see upclose and firsthand, the previously thought implausible ascension of Bill Clinton to the Presidency, I see a very real possibility of circumstances conspiring to produce another and far more dangerous result. There wasn't anything implausible about Bill Clinton winning in 1992, IMHO. He ran a great campaign, Bush ran a horrible one, end of story. Back then, he had a clean slate other than the womanizing. Only after eight years of hindsight can the nation look back and say "What were we THINKING?!?!"
Hitlery, on the other hand, will have to answer to all eight years of scandal up front from the first day of campaigning. And she can't do that and survive the campaign.
23
posted on
12/21/2002 12:51:17 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: leadpenny
I hope so.
While I have confidence in my own opinion, I have been wrong often enough to learn that dozens of opinions averaged together are usually more accurate than one. And of course, thousands would be even better.
Hopefully this thread will also serve as a constant reminder to NEVER, EVER, TAKE YOUR EYES OF THAT WITCH !
24
posted on
12/21/2002 12:51:45 PM PST
by
muleboy
To: muleboy
Her candidacy is beginning to fit together. Her book will out next year or whatever the best time is to boost here visibility. She'll have a powerful high visibility position in the senate. The furor over 9/11 wil have died down. The economy is in shambles. If it hadn't been for jihadists flying airplanes into buildings, she would be out-polling Bush at this point. 0/11 threw a wrench into her timetable, but she's on course. Next year, will initiate a flurry of media support for Hillary. Owlgore was never expected to win. He was only a dupe used to mark time until Hillary could run against Bush in 2004.
Will she install a leftist cabal if she gets in? Yes.
25
posted on
12/21/2002 12:52:37 PM PST
by
RLK
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Saw that picture of Hillary in the New York Post this morning. I have to agree. Hillary is not aging well, man...what bags around her eyes, looks like she has something packed in there.
Hillary might toss her name into the political democratic arena, but she will never even get the nod from the Democratic Party to run for President or Vice President....No one really likes Hillary,she has a heart of stone and obviously a face to match. I am sure she has nothing to offer Ted Kennedy, who has already hand picked John Kerry to run.
By the way, do not stare at that picture of Hillary too long, it will draw all the life out of your body.
To: Timesink
Hillary Clinton could win.
Foolish to count her out.
She will the favorite for the Democrats
whenever she runs.
If the Republican expand government
and alienate their base and send
the economy in a tailspend with
bigger government the people
will be in a mood to election the opposition
and hence Hillary.
Ultimately what the Republican do with their power
is the key.
To: leadpenny
You didn't get that backwards?LOL! It's entirely possible. We're still waiting for Bill's medical records to be released!
28
posted on
12/21/2002 12:53:38 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: muleboy
It's only a matter of time.
She wants the presidency--bad. I seriously doubt she can get "elected" in a two candidate race, especially against a popular incumbent. But there are other ways to get to the oval office (voter fraud, manipulating the media and the masses, dividing the Republicans, third party candidates, and so forth). I wouldn't be surprised if she and her cronies were cooking up some kind of scheme to help her achieve her ambitions in the near future.
29
posted on
12/21/2002 12:54:15 PM PST
by
wai-ming
To: muleboy
I agree. Not making accusations, mind you, but I believe that most FReepers who say she will not run in '04, make those predictions with their fingers crossed behind their back.
To: muleboy
While the thought of Hitlery becoming President is indeed terrifying, I don't believe it will happen. She's lost credibility since New York had the State-Wide brainfart that put her in the Senate. I also don't believe that the Dems will truly "reinvigorate Black support" due to the Trent Lott fiasco. Hitlery's statement that basically said all Southern Republicans are racists and tried to smear it over the rest of the Republican party. I think this will end up being a big mistake and a losing proposition. It's obvious to most thinking people (and even to a lot of the Dems) that this is further proof that the Dems don't have a positive platform to run on and all they can do is try to find faults in their opponents to whine and cry about.
31
posted on
12/21/2002 12:54:31 PM PST
by
trebb
To: muleboy
muleboy: You should fall on your knees and pray that the idiot dems run Hillary.
She doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected!
To: muleboy
I really feel that she is unelectable. She couldn't win a national election unless the Republicans dug up a candidate even more disgusting. However, I think running in 2004 is better for her ego. If she waits 'till 2008, the Dem's will probably have a better candidate than she. She might even get booted form her own state, hey you never now. But by running now, with such a weak pool of candidates for the Dems, she might very well win the nomination, and secure her place in the history books as the first woman to be nominated on a major ticket. Then when she loses the election she could blame it on sexism or some drivel. She probably won't even get the chance if she waits.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
ADD this to the Family Album....
Merry Christmas
34
posted on
12/21/2002 12:57:31 PM PST
by
GRRRRR
To: Timesink
A couple years ago, people said she wouldn't win because she had no experience. She is biding her time. She makes herself visible when she feels the need. She is pulling the strings.
By 2004, many will say she does have the experience and the strength to win. Also, the fraud must be factored into the equation. Many here are using a fair race and election as their premise. You must think about it the way the rats would.
Let's hope enough people did have a wake up call in 2000. Pay attention to the beast behind the curtain.
To: muleboy
12:00 DBT (Daylight BITCH Time) !!!!!!!!!!
36
posted on
12/21/2002 12:59:03 PM PST
by
jmax
To: fightu4it
She doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected I don't know how many times I heard New Yorkers saying that same phrase not all that long ago. Sure, NY is not America but those same people said Upstate NY is not New York City.
37
posted on
12/21/2002 12:59:23 PM PST
by
Cagey
To: Timesink
Bill Clinton actually becoming POTUS was most certainly implausible to those of us who had watched him for over a decade in Arkansas.
Bill went from a failed candidate for Congress, to Atty. General, to youngest Governor in the nation, to youngest ex-Governor, to youngest re-elected Governor, to the disaster of the '88 convention following his "aborted" run, to his resurrection on Carson's Tonight Show, to his curiously weird run in '90, then the "listening" tour, to Gennifer Flower's, culminating in New Hampshire's "comeback".
Even in the days before accepting the nomination, Clinton's candidacy seemed headed for failure until Perot dropped out.
Thus having seen how such seeming predictable results can be turned on their head time and again, that is why I am so committed to monitoring HRC.
38
posted on
12/21/2002 1:02:58 PM PST
by
muleboy
To: dead
There are alot of electoral votes in Massachussetts, New York, and California, but there aren't enough for her to win. Two little words:
VOTE FRAUD
To: fightu4it
40
posted on
12/21/2002 1:03:51 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-245 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson