Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Crunch jams Universal cycle [Cosmology]
Nature Magazine ^ | 23 Decemeber 2002 | PHILIP BALL

Posted on 12/22/2002 6:07:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry

Space might end up dark, thick and boring.

The Universe is not as bouncy as some think, say two physicists. If a Big Crunch follows the Big Bang, it may get stuck that way for ever1.

A fluid of black holes would bung up space. There would be nothing to drive another Big Bang, and nowhere else to go. The Universe would be, you might say, stuffed.

In a bouncing universe, all the matter currently flying apart slows until it reverses and falls towards a Big Crunch. Some physicists think this could ignite another Big Bang, in an unending sequence of expansion and contraction.

An idea called M-theory suggests how the switch from crunch to bang could happen2. The details depend on the shape of space: whether it is infinite and flat, or finite and curved like the surface of a balloon or a doughnut.

Thomas Banks of Rutgers University, New Jersey, and Willy Fischler of the University of Texas at Austin have considered a flat, infinite space in which particles get ever closer and ever denser.

In a space with such features, the smallest kinks in density are amplified into black holes, the densest objects in the Universe. So the whole of space-time would congeal into a very lumpy soup - a black crunch.

"We don't really know what this fluid is made out of," Fischler admits. But he and Banks argue that it may reach a pressure at which it cannot become any denser. At this point, the speed of sound equals the speed of light. Deadlock results.

No theory can cope with a Big Crunch. Because of this, says Fischler, the analysis that he and Banks have performed remains speculative. And a doughnut-shaped Universe could meet a quite different fate, he adds.

References:

1. Banks, T. & Fishler, W. Black Crunch. Preprint http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0212113, (2002). |Article|
2. Khoury, J., Ovrut, B. A., Seiberg, N., Steinhardt, P. J. & Turok, N. From Big Crunch to Big Bang. Preprint http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0108187, (2002). |Article|
[See the original article for links in the footnotes]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bigbang; bigcrunch; blackhole; cosmology; crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-285 next last
To: MacDorcha
Wow, so wrong.
61 posted on 12/22/2002 7:21:28 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
you dont know that [we won't know the things we aren't meant to know].

This is one of those times where I have faith.

62 posted on 12/22/2002 7:21:45 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
right, and you've been there, so you MUST be the definative source of information on the subject. we cant see or percieve what is beyound our capapbilites to reach and/or detect.
next please.
63 posted on 12/22/2002 7:22:43 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
MacDorcha wrote"... PROVE the universe exists. the point of God is the unexplaned. we dont know the capabilities of God, nor the standards or boundries there-of. but if we are going to accept that the universe is expanding, what initiated it? "

I see it, I experience it, I can measure it thus it exists.

no need to get into the philosphy of it unlike when you bring in God only philosophy can suffice.

What initiated God? the question is the same. the difference is the universe exists.
64 posted on 12/22/2002 7:25:41 PM PST by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
right, and you've been there, so you MUST be the definative source of information on the subject. we cant see or percieve what is beyound our capapbilites to reach and/or detect.

Yes. MacDorcha, this is God. Stop trying to shout down the scientists. I did it MY way ...

That is all.

65 posted on 12/22/2002 7:25:53 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
well if its expanding into the quantum, why does the quantum plane exist alongside our percieved plane? if it were expaniding, it would be pushing it away, ans we would not see any. when we see the things though, it proves that there is either a leak, or the quantum exists on both sides of the universal barrier. in which case, it would be like pumping a water balloon... underwater. the univers would be expaning into a greater universe.
66 posted on 12/22/2002 7:26:32 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
What's the universe expanding into?

I believe the universe is infinite in all directions. There is no leading edge of expansion. Space itself expands endlessly. Galaxies exist in all directions infinitely: Look at the Hubble Deep Field North and South.

In a sense there is no Big Bang: The early universe was infinitely denser and hotter. The speed of light also appears to slow down, as one approaches the Big Bang in a recent study of black holes.

This in turn raises the existential question as what "13 billion years ago" really means.

I'll stop my little digression at this point.

67 posted on 12/22/2002 7:27:00 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
ill take your sarcasm as your stepping down.
68 posted on 12/22/2002 7:27:01 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
MATH isnt a speculation so no need for the disclaimer again you try to play word games :)
69 posted on 12/22/2002 7:27:03 PM PST by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: friendly
i agree with you on that one.
70 posted on 12/22/2002 7:27:49 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
What's the universe expanding into?

I believe the universe is infinite in all directions. There is no leading edge of expansion. Space itself expands endlessly. Galaxies exist in all directions infinitely: Look at the Hubble Deep Field North and South.

In a sense there is no Big Bang: The early universe was infinitely denser and hotter. The speed of light also appears to slow down, as one approaches the Big Bang in a recent study of black holes.

This in turn raises the existential question as what "13 billion years ago" really means.

I'll stop my little digression at this point.

71 posted on 12/22/2002 7:27:53 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
draw a circle on a paper. find halfway between any two points that are exactly opposite the other. center of a flat, round universe. wow, so hard.

You haven't kept up on the latest science news. The Universe (ours, spelled with a capital "U") is neither symmetric nor one-dimensional.

72 posted on 12/22/2002 7:28:19 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
ill take your sarcasm as your stepping down.

I don't see where there's much to discuss, do you?

73 posted on 12/22/2002 7:28:34 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
but you did make a plain statement, without the disclaimer, which i responded to, and you responded to that one. you told me to state something so that people wouldnt assume i knew everything, or that all i said was fact, but my point was, you didn't there.
74 posted on 12/22/2002 7:29:08 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: friendly
The speed of light also appears to slow down, as one approaches the Big Bang in a recent study of black holes.

Huh?

75 posted on 12/22/2002 7:29:32 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
MacDorcha wrote"so you MUST be the definative source of information on the subject. we cant see or percieve what is beyound our capapbilites to reach and/or detect. "

The wonderful thing about Math is it lets us go places we can't see and percieve things beyond our capabilities.
76 posted on 12/22/2002 7:29:41 PM PST by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
"I see it, I experience it, I can measure it thus it exists. "


so do dreams. you cant prove that you arent a dream to me, even if i was wide awake, you couldnt prove i wasnt sleeping, not definatelynot to me. we can't prove something like "the Matrix" isnt happening right now. its laughable, but hey, you cant prove it.
77 posted on 12/22/2002 7:31:40 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
only, if it's beyond our realm of perception, how do we know it operates the same way?
78 posted on 12/22/2002 7:32:24 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
McDorcha wrote "well if its expanding into the quantum, why does the quantum plane exist alongside our percieved plane? if it were expaniding, it would be pushing it away, ans we would not see any. when we see the things though, it proves that there is either a leak, or the quantum exists on both sides of the universal barrier. in which case, it would be like pumping a water balloon... underwater. the univers would be expaning into a greater universe."


It is possible that this Universe is expanding into a greater universe. However higher deminsional physics are not the physics we enjoy at the Macro level and we know that at the quantum level particles do not act or react the way they do on our level.

79 posted on 12/22/2002 7:33:13 PM PST by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Where, precisely, do you think the "center" of the Universe is?

Well, I live in North Carolina, and to hear some basketball fans around here tell it, the center of the Universe is at UNC Chapel Hill.

80 posted on 12/22/2002 7:35:21 PM PST by Oberon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson