Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FED FINANCED PROGRAM STUDIES BODY REACTION TO PORN
The Drudge Report ^ | December 23, 2002 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 12/22/2002 10:18:32 PM PST by FreedomCalls

A federally funded study has paid women as much as $75 to watch pornographic videos to determine 'what types of audiovisual erotica women find sexually arousing'...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: federal; government; money; stupidity; taxes; waste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
For the end purpose of ...... what?
1 posted on 12/22/2002 10:18:32 PM PST by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Your taxes at work.
2 posted on 12/22/2002 10:19:23 PM PST by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
This is a Klintoon holdover, of course!
3 posted on 12/22/2002 10:20:03 PM PST by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Well, if the Feds get in the pornography business maybe they eventually wouldn't need tax money. ;o)
4 posted on 12/22/2002 10:21:36 PM PST by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Bet govt employees were clamoring to get on the review board of this study..... :o
5 posted on 12/22/2002 10:23:15 PM PST by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
What a waste of money! Everybody knows that women don't watch porn.....sheeeesh.
6 posted on 12/22/2002 10:30:22 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Same reaction I had ....WHY?
7 posted on 12/22/2002 10:30:44 PM PST by KineticKitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: FreedomCalls
Was clinton president when this happened? That would make sense... he wants to know how to appeal to his tv viewing audience. (gag)
9 posted on 12/22/2002 10:32:37 PM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
A federally funded study has paid women as much as $75 to watch pornographic videos to determine 'what types of audiovisual erotica women find sexually arousing'...

How much are they paying volunteers to watch the women watching the audivisual erotica, to determine if they are sexually aroused?




10 posted on 12/22/2002 10:33:15 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hove
What a waste of money! Everybody knows that women don't watch porn.....sheeeesh.

Silly, that is why they had to be paid.

11 posted on 12/22/2002 10:38:36 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
How much are they paying volunteers to watch the women watching the audivisual erotica, to determine if they are sexually aroused?

It's a rough job, but someone's gotta do it on the government's dime.

What is the point of this study exactly? How to sell more porn to women?

12 posted on 12/22/2002 10:42:05 PM PST by GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
On his radio program, Drudge stated that this was more of an important story than the resolution by 30 cities not to enforce the Patriot Act.

I think Drudge needs to get his priorities straight. Sure, selling newspapers is important, but this is a pretty lightweight story.
13 posted on 12/22/2002 10:42:16 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I am having a very HARD time understanding the point of this screed!
14 posted on 12/22/2002 10:44:31 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Damn! I could've been getting paid to watch porn all these years? I'm going to submit a voucher for back pay. That check ought to be huge.
15 posted on 12/22/2002 10:45:58 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
What is the point of this study exactly? How to sell more porn to women?

I think it's to determine how to e-mail porn to young babes at the office without getting hit with a harassment suit.




16 posted on 12/22/2002 10:46:59 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
An unconscienable waste of my Federal tax dollars!

However, since I already paid for it, what did they find?

17 posted on 12/22/2002 10:57:32 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern; Dallas
I'm still trying to get a goobermint grant to repudiate the 1962 findings of a previous study on the Frisbee and my beancounters are wasting tax dollars on this crap ?!?!?!?!

:o) Stay Safe & Merry New Year ya'll

18 posted on 12/22/2002 10:59:32 PM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Well, what types of audiovisual erotica women find sexually arousing?

C'mon Drudge, the facts man, and will they be out on DVD in time for XXXmas?

19 posted on 12/22/2002 11:04:09 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
More Porn-barrel spending...
20 posted on 12/22/2002 11:08:44 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson