Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2002 10:47:46 PM PST by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Wondervixen
I ve said this before and I will say it again and again....as long as they keep using our virtue against us it will always look like they are winning...BUT they really aren't
2 posted on 12/22/2002 10:51:39 PM PST by rkrtgw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wondervixen
Good points. Who is Maryellen Davies?
3 posted on 12/22/2002 11:02:51 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wondervixen

We're working on it. Seen this?

Now that's the sort of thing that the liberal media spikes in its role as the Guardian of the Democratic Party. But... they can't control what gets out anymore. Ten years ago, even five years ago, they could. I don't think they can today, and we're going to find out.

Right now this looks to be a piece confined to the readership of Newsmax, and now Free Republic. I have a hunch that Certain Other Outlets will be picking it up shortly. By the end of Monday, 15 to 20 million people might know about Mr. Clinton's qualifications to talk about how "Republicans" intimidate black voters.

No question, the Usual Suspects will pretend that this story does not exist. There will not be a breath of it in the New York Times, or on CBS, NBC, ABC, or CNN. But by this time next week, everybody's gonna know. It won't look like a media firestorm, because "the media" will be totally silent about it. But it won't matter; everybody's gonna know that Clinton was sued for intimidating black voters, that he tried to substitute a white candidate for a black one and was overruled by the Supreme Court, and that our media will lie and cover for the sumbitch.

This is why Fox News keeps picking up viewers. Every week, people find out about more stuff that the media lies about to protect their buddies in The Party. And everybody's sick of it.


4 posted on 12/22/2002 11:04:25 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wondervixen
Good Post. Good points!
12 posted on 12/23/2002 3:06:16 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wondervixen
Until we find the way to rise, voices united in outrage against EQUALLY OFFENSIVE gaffes by Dummycraps, we're going to be out-shouted by people who have made lying, spinning, and twisting of polling data a filthy artform to get their way.

The left is able to do what it does because to the left, politics is life. We conservatives don't think that way: other things are more important to us. We don't want to sacrifice our lives for something as soulless as politics. And, for that reason, they'll always seem to win.

But they'll have sold their souls to "win," and in the end they'll have gained nothing.

We, OTOH, need merely to do what is right. We may not always win, but our souls will be intact, and we'll never have to find ourselves defending atrocities.

Dear friends, I urge you, as aliens and strangers in the world, to abstain from sinful desires, which war against your soul. Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us. (1 Peter 2:11-12)

"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will recognize them by their fruits. (Matt. 7:15-20)

18 posted on 12/23/2002 9:19:50 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wondervixen
I heard someone's idea for getting a more conservative media (outside of radio) going. It sounded feasible. Here's the plan. Get a group of conservatives with money together . My friend's idea was the NRA.

His idea was to buy or start small local weekly throw away papers. The type that appear on your lawn. Get some syndicated national columns and add a few local news stories, pesented through a conservative prism. As one becomes profitable, buy another.

Also start buying old movie theaters. Run second run movies at a discount, then start running conservative independent movies. Get a network of a couple hundred going and it would give independent conservative directors a ready made market. This would make Hollywood's influence less important.

Start cable t.v. stations. Not just news, but entertainment, too. Imagine if the Clinton Chronicles were on T.V. before the 1996 elections. Anyway I don't know how feasible this would be, but it does seem possible. Also, take a plan out of Strom Thurmond's or Jesse Helms' playbook from the '60's. WHichever one it was had threatened to have churches buy the broadcast network's stock because of their bias. (This would be more difficult now that there are so many shares).

19 posted on 12/23/2002 9:43:08 AM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson