Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: logic101.net
Sounds to me from the article that Koppel paid extra for the land in order to secure the agreements not to build over 10,000 square foot homes. The developers agreed to that contractual framework, and ought to abide by it. I'm no fan of Ted Koppel, he's a flaming liberal puke, IMHO - but it seems to me that he is in the right on this.
9 posted on 12/26/2002 6:39:33 AM PST by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Notforprophet
From what I read here it looks like the houses are under 10,000 sq. ft.
17 posted on 12/26/2002 7:16:49 AM PST by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Notforprophet
I think Howdy Dootie is right on this one. If it is in the covenants the people buying into the development should have know about it.
Where I live basements aren't considered part of the square footage of a residence. I believe that the rooms counted as part of the square footage of a house varies from area to area. I have to ask Ted how the excess of 10,000 sq.ft. for two people is any more defensible than 14,000 square feet?
22 posted on 12/26/2002 7:34:51 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson