When it comes to their profession, yes. This was the stupidest analogy I've ever seen on these threads, and I've seen some really stupid analogies before.
We have no DNA evidence of any non-human species other than Neanderthals.
And, in this situation, we don't need to. Either you didn't read the article, or, more likely, you didn't understand the article. The study was done by comparing different groups of humans across the globe to ascertain when or if humanity spread from Africa. Non-human DNA would have been useless in this study, don't you think?
Wanna bet that he'll top it next month?
When it comes to their profession, yes. This was the stupidest analogy I've ever seen on these threads, and I've seen some really stupid analogies before.
Guess prostitutes do not lie? They are good people? They have morals? You keep showing how ridiculous you are.
We have no DNA evidence of any non-human species other than Neanderthals.-me-
And, in this situation, we don't need to. Either you didn't read the article, or, more likely, you didn't understand the article. The study was done by comparing different groups of humans across the globe to ascertain when or if humanity spread from Africa. Non-human DNA would have been useless in this study, don't you think?
I did read the article and YOU do not think. The article is about whether Homo Sapies arose from other species of hominids. The only DNA ever found from other species of hominids is from Neanderthals and those show that Homoe Sapiens did not descend from Neanderthal. Therefore there is no basis for comparing any DNA to show descent from any other species and the study is just nonsense. In addition, in the short space of some 2000 years of history, there have been dozens of invasions of Europe from as far afield as Mongolia, so there has been a lot of mixing of DNA from the far corners of the globe in that short period. To extrapolate from nothing to nothing with no evidence at all is total deceit and because these people are justifying their taking of government money (my money) with this garbage, constitutes fraud and grand theft. So yes, these people you call scientists are indeed prostitutes and I can see why you are defending prostitutes - they are so much like those you hold in such high esteem.