Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sheamanski
If NK attacks..our men on the front will die...people will then blame bush. He better understand this..it will be the end of his admin...Just when he thinks hes got things under control this could bring him down.

He needs to pull our guys out immed..tell china ans sk to handle it..then politically he can still blame on Klinton policy. If he doesnt act the press and even right thinking people can place blame on him,

Comments??

Yes, I have one. You presuppose that the American people would not be even mildly upset while thousands of our men were being killed by the North Koreans.

People will not blame the President. Rather, in response to a set-piece attack, we would have no alternative but to mobilize the reserves, reinstitute the draft, and go all out. Which this President would. Which we, as a people, would fight. We are made of sterner stuff than you suppose.

I have an awful feeling in my gut that the War on Terror has passed into history. The Third World War is about to begin.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

79 posted on 12/27/2002 5:10:10 PM PST by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: section9
It's not just that the Third World War has begun (probably started with the 1993 bombing of the WTC, with the Prelude being the Gulf War), it's that ALL of our enemies are playing to our strengths (military and economic).

Whether on the battlefield or in the banks, the U.S. rules; there simply isn't any serious competition to us. Where we were losing was back when the battles were being fought in the press, the UN, and in diplomatic "negotiations".

But on the battlefield?! Oh please. Throw me in that briar patch.

In the market? Again, thow me into that briar patch.

A large, modern war, with nukes, chems, and bios deployed clearly favors the U.S. We have more of all of the above. Ours is better and faster and more lethal, too. Our population is fully dispersed geographicly, and our borders are more defendable than any of our enemies' borders are for them against our weapons systems.

So let our enemies continue to play to our strength. It is in WAR that we can defeat them.

It was the peace where we were at risk. 600 votes going the other way in 2000, for instance, would pretty much set us up to lose this war, had the slightest changes in our peace manifested themselves inopportunely...

107 posted on 12/27/2002 7:28:53 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: section9
Sadly, I think you are correct.

Our biological and chemical defenses in the US are horribly underprepared.

We're all a bunch of sitting canaries. The coal mine is not well supplied because the levels of gov't are too busy shoveling cash to favorite parts of the economy.

Rereading the original posting made me consider one thing.

If we go against Iraq and confiscate the ME oil supply in Iraq, it won't matter to NorKor (unless they are trading missiles for oil).

Given how screwed up the NorKor economy is, ya' think that the NorKor's might be trading nuclear weapons for oil?

DUH

Why is it that NorKor is turning on the nuclear reactors while we ready for war in the ME?

Gee... could it be that NorKor is acting proxy for Iraq/Iran in return for future oil supplies from the ME?

But, what could the ME nations want from NorKor???

DUH... NUKES????

Sounds like school yard bartering but on a global scale.
121 posted on 12/28/2002 1:11:41 AM PST by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson