Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The gun in the labourer's house
National Post (f/k/a The Financial Post) | December 31, 2002 | Pierre Lemieux

Posted on 12/31/2002 1:49:22 PM PST by tarawa

Copyright 2002 National Post, All Rights Reserved National Post (f/k/a The Financial Post)

December 31, 2002 Tuesday National Edition

SECTION: Editorials; Pg. A15

LENGTH: 987 words

HEADLINE: The gun in the labourer's house

SOURCE: National Post

BYLINE: Pierre Lemieux

BODY: Underlying our apparently peaceful democracies is the idea that the ultimate rampart against tyranny lies in the resistance of the people. This is not only an American and a French idea, but also a very English one.

In his classic Commentaries on the Laws of England, Sir William Blackstone, the famous 18th-century English jurist, stressed the danger of power for "English liberties." The constitution (for this is how Blackstone labelled the legal traditions of England) provided safeguards under the form of "certain auxiliary subordinate rights of the subject, which serve principally as barriers to protect and maintain inviolate the three great and primary rights, of personal security, personal liberty, and private property." The auxiliary rights "of every Englishman" included the right "of having arms for their defence ... [which] is a public allowance, under due restrictions, of the natural right of resistance and self preservation, when the sanctions of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression." Many people like to think that they would start resisting before tyranny is well entrenched, but few actually would. It is risky to disobey laws: The state has the power to put resistors in jail, or give them criminal records. State propaganda tries to isolate and discredit resistors, especially when they are part of a minority ("a dwindling minority," scorns the Canadian Firearms Centre). Armchair resistors who imagine themselves as heroes adulated by the populace are usually wrong: They will be treated as marginals, cranks, outcasts, criminals. Only later will early resistors be seen as heroes.

Starting tomorrow, we will have an opportunity to meet such heroes of the early resistance. On Jan. 1-3, in Ottawa, a few members and supporters of the Canadian Unregistered Firearm Owners Association (CUFOA) will post their "Declaration of Non-compliance," and go to 24 Sussex Drive to present to the Prime Minister the ashes from their firearms licences and gun registration certificates. If they have not yet been arrested, they will visit the offices of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney-General. They are also planning to swap firearm parts which, since 1998, is a crime without a prior permission from the state. They are considering a side trip to Montreal.

The feds have tried diversion tactics. First, the Justice Department announced that prosecutions would not start until six months after the gun registration deadline of today, Dec. 31, so as to give time to the bureaucrats to issue the certificates applied for. Second, on Dec. 27, the department announced that gun owners unable to use the overloaded registration system can, before Jan. 1, write, fax, or e-mail their intention to register when the bureaucrats have fixed the one-billion-dollar system. The Ottawa heroes are still not complying with this pre-registration, and they are also in violation of the personal licensing obligation which came into force one year ago.

As the infamous C-68 "law" (the third major piece of firearm control legislation in 25 years) comes into full force, owning firearms without a personal licence and a registration certificate for each gun are crimes that carry penalties of up to 10 years in jail. The CUFOA resistors quote Henry David Thoreau: "When a man's conscience and the laws clash, it is his conscience that he must follow." They could also quote the 18th-century English writer Junius: "The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures."

There are many reasons to resist C-68. It forces any individual who even only wants to keep his hunting gun at home to apply for a personal licence every five years, and tell the police about his depressions and his love life. It forces 10% of the Canadian adult population to notify the police when they change addresses. It grants the police arbitrary powers to seize guns and to deny or revoke licences. In certain circumstances, it allows searches (rechristened "inspections") without warrants. C-68 also forces the registration of all individual guns, and prepares the sort of confiscation that the British and the Australians have recently suffered (like, before them, subjects of all totalitarian countries). It is one of the last nails in the coffin of the right of individuals to defend their lives if the police cannot (or will not) intervene.

C-68 will have also created, from a few hundreds of thousands (according to government estimates) to a few millions, of instant, peaceful, paper criminals.

George Orwell, the author of 1984, wrote: "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."

At great personal risk, a few Canadian heroes have made it their job to see that the gun stays in the labourer's house. Besides CUFOA, other groups like the Law-abiding Unregistered Firearms Association (LUFA) are engaged in civil disobedience. Individual resistors like Allister Muir, a Nova Scotia businessman, have publicly admitted having guns without the required permits, and challenged the state to prosecute them.

CUFOA's strategy of civil disobedience is especially daring. The Ottawa demonstrators will either be arrested, showing the real nature of the law, or else they will prove that the state does not dare enforce its so-called "law" against peaceful citizens. This small group of resistors includes respectable citizens such as CUFOA president Jim Turnbull, Dr. Edward Hudson, a veterinarian, Dr. Joe Gingrich, a dentist, Claire Joly, a Montreal writer, and Yvon Dionne, a retired civil servant and the Quebec spokesman for the demonstration.

From those of us who are less brave, from those of us who believe in individual liberty, from our future descendants, these heroes deserve gratitude and praise.


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/31/2002 1:49:22 PM PST by tarawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tarawa
Now, if people would just join in we could have a freedom movement starting.

"We give credibility to unjust laws by obeying them."
— Reverend Alan Boesak

2 posted on 12/31/2002 1:56:52 PM PST by Lysander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarawa
I wish them luck! I hope the politicians come to their senses. However, I am reminded of all the PVC rifle/pistol storage containers that were being sold at gun shows about 5 years ago!
3 posted on 12/31/2002 8:08:11 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
We have a similar "lit-fuse" situation here in Ca. All "assault" rifles are supposed to be registered and a fee paid. A large percentage are not registered and the powers-that-be are so far scared to enforce the law.

They appear to be nibbling around the edges by grabbing the guys that have other infractions like the ubiquitous "restraining order". I have been predicting mass resistance when they get up enough nerve to actually go door-to-door and confiscate rifles.

This year should be interesting in that regard here in tyranny-land.
4 posted on 01/01/2003 1:37:11 AM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tarawa
Interestingly enough, this article has found a home on other sites as well:

http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=8487

http://lufa.ca/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=116

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1363

http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/viewtopic.php?t=2092
5 posted on 01/01/2003 1:51:44 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howie
...a similar "lit-fuse" situation here in Ca

I hear you!

Once upon a time, I lived in S.F., CA. I now live in WA state. When the ultra-liberals passed the assualt weapon ban in CA, I lived in WA and I called the and e-mailed the State Dept of Justice (or what ever it is called, maybe attorney General's office, I have forgotten in the years since.) I had inherited a paratrooper M1 Cabine from my wife's father.

I asked them if since it had a folding stock, a bayonet lug, was semi-auto and capable of standard 20 to 30 round clips if it was illegal to own, should I ever want to retire in California. They told me that yes, I would have to either remove some of the features, make it inoperable, or surrender it to police, should I ever wish to retire to California. I told them that it was only an M1 Carbine a fairly common semi-automatic rifle of not much knock down power. They didn't care.

Bottom line, is that I will not take my retirement money and help that state's economy.

6 posted on 01/01/2003 11:01:57 AM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
I predict a mass exodus when the pols start sneaking in more new taxes to cover their power-drunk, years long spending spree. Our budget deficit is larger than 48 other states combined! We are essentially bankrupt and the liberals all just ordered new luxury SUVs to tool around their districts in!!!
7 posted on 01/01/2003 11:29:54 AM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howie
Between high California taxes, lack of water from the Colorado River, institutionalized higher power costs due to bonding what should have been paid off quickly, and being a haven for anti-business litigation, California's economy is amazing.

It will be interesting to see if the economy can be revived? If it doesn't then you are right, the only logical result is an exodus of people and that would result in a real crash in government spending.

8 posted on 01/01/2003 1:04:51 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson