Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: titanmike
The curious total lack of any evidence of interbreeding between modern humans and neanderthals is most problematical precisely in the levant in which moderns and neanderthals are known to have existed in close proximity for long periods of time and you'd figure interbreeding should have been very common IF it was possible.

A curious statement. "The Levant" is exactly where the intergrading of human and Neanderthal features is most pronounced. Note the comments on the linked page regarding "Skhul V" specimen in particular. Then there's the Lagar Velho child from Portugal, which looks a lot like a human-neanderthal hybrid.

78 posted on 01/01/2003 11:42:12 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Aside from the fact that you can't make any sort of a case based on one or two skeletons, the fact that the one or two possible crossbreeds for which somebody does have skeletal remains did not live past childhood might tell you something. As I see it, the preponderence of evidence including the DNA studies, Shreeve's article, and Gunnar Heinsohn's comments indicate that neanderthals were the human type antecedant to us, and that the changeover was rapid and driven by design change of some sort rather than evolution. That doesn't preclude the two types living in proximity for some number of generations AFTER the introduction of modern humans.

That apelike rib cage is a real kicker. That's a piece of the puzzle I was not aware of until now. That alone would probably make a neanderthal so ugly to one of ourselves as to preclude dating or anything like that.

83 posted on 01/01/2003 12:56:48 PM PST by titanmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson