Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Wesley Clark for President?
NewsMax.com ^ | 1/04/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 01/04/2003 12:45:59 PM PST by kattracks

The Progressive Review, an admittedly liberal, but excellent e-mail report (we read it every day at NewsMax) warns of Wesley Clark, who is reported to be thinking about running for president.

In examining the background of this man who would be president the Review learned that Clark is a longtime friend of Clinton - a fact that helped his rise to the top. He has also been employed by the Stephens Group, part of the Stephens family empire that helped to launch Clinton's career and keep him in the 1992 primaries despite cash problems.

According to the Review Clark commanded Fort Hood during the time it provided illegal troops and weapons used in the Waco massacre.

On August 3, 1999, the Guardian wrote "No sooner are we told by Britain's top generals that the Russians played a crucial role in ending the west's war against Yugoslavia than we learn that if NATO's supreme commander, the American General Wesley Clark, had had his way, British paratroopers would have stormed Pristina airport threatening to unleash the most frightening crisis with Moscow since the end of the cold war. "I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the internationalK-For peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen. Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital. . . Mary Robinson, the UN human rights commissioner, said NATO's bombing campaign had lost its "moral purpose".

And on November 12, 1999, at the beginning of the Kosovo conflict, Counterpunch delved into the military career of General Clark and discovered that his meteoric rise through the ranks was the result of "the successful manipulation of appearances: faking the results of combat exercises, greasing to superiors and other practices common to the general officer corps. We correctly predicted that the unspinnable realities of a real war would cause him to become unhinged. Given that Clark attempted to bomb the CNN bureau in Belgrade and ordered the British General Michael Jackson to engage Russian troops in combat at the end of the war, we feel events amply vindicated our forecast. "With the end of hostilities it has become clear even to Clark that most people, apart from some fanatical members of the war party in the White House and State Department, consider the general, as one Pentagon official puts it, "a horse's ass." Defense Secretary William Cohen is known to loathe him, and has seen to it that the Hammer of the Serbs will be relieved of the NATO command two months early."

Wrote columnist Robert Novak- "Members of Congress who, during their spring recess, met in Brussels with Gen. Wesley Clark, the NATO supreme commander, were startled by his bellicosity. According to the lawmakers, Clark suggested the best way to handle Russia's supply of oil to Yugoslavia would be aerial bombardment of the pipeline that runs through Hungary. He also proposed bombing Russian warships that enter the battle zone.

On April 20, 1999, columnist and much-decorated Col. David Hackworth - wrote that Clark "Known by those who've served with him as the "Ultimate Perfumed Prince," [is] far more comfortable in a drawing room discussing political theories than hunkering down in the trenches where bullets fly and soldiers die."

Counterpunch described Clark as "The poster child for everything that is wrong with the GO (general officer) corps," exclaims one colonel, who has had occasion to observe Clark in action, citing, among other examples, his command of the 1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood from 1992 to 1994."

Clark, of course, would run as a Democrat.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Waco


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintonista; electionpresident; perfumedprince; traitor; tyrant; warcriminal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2003 12:45:59 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
For those of you who would find it difficult to criticize a man like Wesley Clark, remember, Benedict Arnold was a better soldier than he is.
2 posted on 01/04/2003 12:48:10 PM PST by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Very few worse candidates come to mind: clinton, sen clinton, b. boxer,,,,,well you get the picture.
3 posted on 01/04/2003 12:50:42 PM PST by realpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Noooooooooooooooooooooo!

On the other hand, W would beat him hands down!

4 posted on 01/04/2003 12:52:47 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Clark and Waco...enough said. Hang the traitor!
5 posted on 01/04/2003 12:57:02 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Election President
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
6 posted on 01/04/2003 12:58:40 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
Benedict Arnold was a better soldier and commander than a lot of patriotic American fighters. His fighting at Saratoga and Fort Stanwicks was heroic. Also after his failed assault on Quebec, Arnold stopped the British at the Battle of Valcour Isle, which saved American forces from a complete disaster.
7 posted on 01/04/2003 1:00:00 PM PST by ChicagoRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I have a hard time respecting a General that is a long time friend of someone that has made a life of despising the military and everything it stands for.
8 posted on 01/04/2003 1:03:39 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
I think it it pretty safe to say that Clark would be utterly bulldozed by Bush. He was one of the most hated symbols of the Clinton administration for the military, and people will be coming out of the woodwork to make his weaseling ways known.
9 posted on 01/04/2003 1:07:37 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What with Bush throwing in his hat with the neo-cons and the nomination of Wesley Clark by the Dems, maybe Pat will reconsider and run again. LOL.

Thanks for the warning post. Regards.

10 posted on 01/04/2003 1:10:36 PM PST by The Irishman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Having tried and failed to find the next JFK or FDR, the Democrats are now trying to find the next Gen. George B. McClellan.
11 posted on 01/04/2003 1:30:52 PM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wasn't he the one in charge when 3 of our soldiers were captured and bitch slapped around by the Serbs. From what I read the three soldiers were performing a training exercise near a combat zone. I still have a hard time believing that story.
12 posted on 01/04/2003 1:31:14 PM PST by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
But Wesley Clark was Bill Clinton's 'wag the dog' General!

He can't be ALL bad, can he?

tanks at Waco Oh wait, he was also in charge of the tanks that moved on all those women and children in Waco Texas!

I stand corrected.



President Wesley Clark

President Wesley Clark

13 posted on 01/04/2003 1:43:03 PM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
I think Clark would be a pretty strong candidate. He's pretty decorated (Silver Star, purple heart, etc.), was a Rhodes scholar, doesn't have a voting record, comes from the South, and was the NATO commander. Sure, he's not Eisenhower, but he could be a strong candidate. The only thing is that the left-wing fanatics who vote in the Democrat primaries prefer liberal ideologues like Kerry, Gephardt, or Edwards. Clark will probably be on the bottom of the ticket with Edwards.
14 posted on 01/04/2003 1:46:45 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin; kattracks
Do any of you remember when Clark was showing the films of the train we bombed in Belgrade? Clark maintained it was hit because it was going to fast to see it was a passenger train....yeah, after he speeded up the film!

Jim Inhofe had been a glowing star of congress until he made the "retirement" speech for Clark....I'll never figure that one out.

15 posted on 01/04/2003 1:47:04 PM PST by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; TexKat
ping
16 posted on 01/04/2003 1:47:43 PM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Clark is an empty a uniform as Edwards is an empty suit.
17 posted on 01/04/2003 1:53:31 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Oh wait, he was also in charge of the tanks that moved on all those women and children in Waco Texas!

I suppose that those BFVs and M88 could pass for a tank.

18 posted on 01/04/2003 1:54:01 PM PST by Recon by Fire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
I think Clark would be a pretty strong candidate. He's pretty decorated (Silver Star, purple heart, etc.), was a Rhodes scholar, doesn't have a voting record, comes from the South, and was the NATO commander

Yes, he was a Rhodes scholar. Another of his scholar buddies helped move him to the front of the line once he made the presidency, crowning a long career of spinning, fabricating, and fluffing his record.

After being forced to suffer under 8 years of Clinton, rest assured that a lot of old officers and Clark's other subordinates would rise up and give a good reality check on Bill's little pal. You've gotta love payback.

19 posted on 01/04/2003 1:57:08 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Clark is from Little Rock these days.

Haven't we had enough of being governed by a Rhodes Scholar from Little Rock? I have.
20 posted on 01/04/2003 2:11:39 PM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: 11B3
This is the armchair general who relished dropping bombs on Christians in Serbia. Now the Muslim drug runners that he protected are attacking Nato troops there. What a complete jerkoff.
22 posted on 01/04/2003 2:20:40 PM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Let's see now; implicated in NATO war crimes over Serbia, and at Waco. And he's a Rhodes Scholar, just like Klinton! Well, sounds like the perfect New World Order presidential candidate!
23 posted on 01/04/2003 2:21:11 PM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Wesley Clark is a perfumed princess who's back-stabbing actions against soldier 10 times better then him will come back to haunt him.
25 posted on 01/04/2003 2:28:56 PM PST by GreenCell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenCell
Devout Christians especially those interested in the prophecies and observant of the Seventh-day Sabbath, will never forgive the Clintons and their minions, such as Clark, for taking away from us the most interesting, original and path-breaking scholar and [if you will] "prophet" born in America in the last century, the late [-ly incinerated] David Koresh!

And his family, small children, and entire religious community, were not bykill. They also had to die.

A real bridger-of-the-gap between Jews and Christians, which may be the real reason he had to die. He is with YHWH now. What his sins may have been, YHWH understands.

What might he have achieved had he lived? That too, is why he had to die.

~Must die, must die, this Koresh must die! --For the sake of the nation, this Koresh must die!

26 posted on 01/04/2003 2:44:17 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hey, maybe Ramsey Clark will run next.
27 posted on 01/04/2003 2:49:18 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Wesley Clark is traitorous, tyrannical, war criminal who committed the worst act an American military commander could do, fire on his fellow Americans. He's probably the most dangerous Rat out of all the candidates.
28 posted on 01/04/2003 2:50:34 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
His military record would not withstand scrutiny. I dare say we are looking at the VP Candidate for 2004.

Regards, Ivan

29 posted on 01/04/2003 2:52:18 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Irishman
maybe Pat will reconsider and run again

Buchanen or Paulsen!

8-)

30 posted on 01/04/2003 2:54:54 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There's nothing here we didn't all know about during clinton's criminal attack on Yugoslavia--including Clark's probable complicity in the Waco massacre.

Perhaps, however, he was most famous for twice trying to start World War III by attacking the Russians.
31 posted on 01/04/2003 3:01:26 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon by Fire; TexKat; Grampa Dave; Sacajaweau; browardchad; Shermy; ~Kim4VRWC's~; Travis McGee; ...
I suppose that those BFVs and M88 could pass for a tank.

Wesley Clark's TANKS.

there's also this from http://www.getwaco.com/Waco/WacoP/pages/fsfilm/flstory.html


Then, on the morning of April 19, 1993, we watch as tanks mounted with boom structures rip holes in the compound walls and insert the tear gas. Still the Davidians do not come out, and the FBI reports gunfire coming at them from within the compound. The gassing and demolition of the building continues until late morning.

Fire suddenly breaks out. We see the flames spread quickly in the wind. The compound is soon engulfed. Within minutes, 52 adults and 25 children, including two trauma-born infants, perish in the flames. The fire, the FBI claims, was started by the Davidians.


But questions surrounding the death of the Davidians and the official FBI account of the siege persist – questions such as:

Why was there a premature destruction of the crime scene – a destruction that resulted in critical evidence not being recovered?

Why were shots heard and empty shell casings recovered from an FBI sniper position – when the FBI claims they did not fire their weapons during the siege? And stationed at that position: a sniper notorious for his actions at Ruby Ridge.

Who killed Jimmy Riddle, a Davidian, whose body was found outside the compound walls? He was shot through the head and his body mutilated by a tank. But where are the evidentiary portions of his body? Who killed Jimmy Riddle? Was there more to his death than previously thought?

The questions continue.

Dr. Edward Allard, an infrared expert, analyzed the Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) videotape made by an FBI airplane circling overhead during the siege. The FLIR videotape shows a tank at the back of the compound. The vehicle discharges two men who, according to Dr. Allard, fire into the compound with automatic weapons. Over 60 shots are fired.

Maurice Cox, a former intelligence analyst, testifies in a report that the flashes seen on the Waco FLIR tape could not be solar reflections. Dr. Frederic Whitehurst, narrator and former FBI Crime Lab analyst, concurs.

If the FBI was not shooting, then who was? Was the Delta Force, an elite counter-terrorist military unit in action at Waco – in violation of federal law prohibiting the use of military forces against US citizens?






And who started the fire? Why were pyrotechnic devices capable of starting the fire found in the rubble of the compound if the FBI claims it never used them? Why were pyrotechnic devices found at all three points of origin of the fire?

Why were the bodies of 15 Davidians found shot to death near the only undamaged exit from the compound? Were the flashes on the FLIR tape during the fire actually gunfire aimed at that exit? And how could the bodies accidentally be left to decompose before forensic testing could take place?

Why does the evidence seem to indicate that the hole in the top of the church vault – the "bunker" – was made by the detonation of a high-explosive demolition charge? Why were only the bodies of women and children found in that bunker, and did they die as a result of that explosion?

And finally, why does the evidence show the chain of command during the operation at Waco leading to the office of Vincent Foster and to the First Lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton? Was Vince Foster's suicide related to the deaths at Waco? Why did some of Foster's files on Waco end up missing after his death, and who appears to have seen them last?


The answers are shocking, the evidence disturbing, and the overall conclusions difficult to face. But this is the story that couldn't be ignored; the story of newly uncovered evidence, of missing or destroyed evidence; of shocking testimony and outright deception. It's a story of human fallibility and the abuse of power; a story of outsiders and insiders, and the tragic consequences of violence met with violence.

"
Waco: A New Revelation" is a film America needs to see.



...here's more...
Waco Siege Investigator Found Dead In His Home

Carlos Ghigliotti, who had been retained by a U.S. House committee to help investigate the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Tex., was found dead in Laurel under unexplained circumstances yesterday.

"We're investigating it as a homicide," said Laurel police spokesman Jim Collins. Ghigliotti, 42, was found about 1:30 p.m. in the 600 block of Washington Boulevard. His body was badly decomposed, said police. There were no signs of a break-in or a struggle at the home, where Ghigliotti ran his business, Infrared Technologies Corp., police said. An expert in thermal imaging and videotape, Ghigliotti told the House Government Reform Committee in October that his analysis of tapes at Waco indicated that an FBI agent fired shots at the compound on April 19, the final day of the siege--a view disputed by the FBI.

Michael Caddell, lead lawyer in a $100 million wrongful death lawsuit stemming from the Waco siege, said last night that he recently had discussed the findings with Ghigliotti and intended to retain him--not only because his work was impressive but also because Caddell's first expert had suffered a stoke recently. Caddell said that two weeks ago he wrote to Waco Special Counsel John C. Danforth, urging that he interview Ghigliotti immediately....

32 posted on 01/04/2003 3:04:35 PM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Destro; F-117A
ping!!!!!
33 posted on 01/04/2003 3:04:36 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wesley Clark:

an American Hugo Chavez

...a pompous ass General of our very own...

34 posted on 01/04/2003 3:09:39 PM PST by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
(Clark) has also been employed by the Stephens Group, part of the Stephens family empire that helped to launch Clinton's career and keep him in the 1992 primaries despite cash problems.

This little fact alone should tell anybody who is listening where Clark stands, and whom he stands alongside. This man is a Clinton sychophant of the worst kind. With credentials like these there seems little doubt he is already highly compromised in his personal life and financial dealings.

35 posted on 01/04/2003 3:11:41 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Yeah, it makes you mad and breaks your heart, would drive you crazy if you let it.

We just thoroughly beat another Butcher of Waco here in Fla last fall, looks like another one needs to be put away here.

36 posted on 01/04/2003 3:16:37 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Waco Wesley Clark? Okay, if he's elected, I'll make the Alec Baldwin promise... except I'll actually follow through with it... that is, unless just one of the 70,000,000 gun owners out there decides that its worth the sacrifice.

I'm actually rather stunned that none of the gun nuts went vigilante after Waco and Ruby Ridge. (Timothy McVeigh didn't target anyone responsible, he was just a well-supplied mass murderer.)

37 posted on 01/04/2003 3:21:48 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Yes, and this is the man who is scarier than Al Gore.

Pedal in Peace 2003- Cycling Challenge for the Children of Serbia


38 posted on 01/04/2003 3:23:12 PM PST by smokegenerator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: Holden Magroin
I'd like to see him hanged along with the Madwoman Dulbite
and the entire Clinton administration.
40 posted on 01/04/2003 4:02:58 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Just GREAT===that would make Bill Clinton Secretary of Defense.
41 posted on 01/04/2003 4:06:51 PM PST by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Clark is an ass kissing "yes" man. If he was Commander and Chief, he would have no superior ass to kiss and would die of confusion.
42 posted on 01/04/2003 4:12:17 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; doug from upland; Travis McGee

A Vain, Pompous, Brown-noser

Meet the Real Gen. Clark

Anyone seeking to understand the bloody fiasco of the Serbian war need hardly look further than the person of the beribboned Supreme Allied Commander, General Wesley K. Clark. Politicians and journalists are generally according him a respectful hearing as he discourses on the "schedule" for the destruction of Serbia, tellingly embracing phrases favored by military bureaucrats such as "systematic" and "methodical".

The reaction from former army subordinates is very different.
"The poster child for everything that is wrong with the GO (general officer) corps," exclaims one colonel, who has had occasion to observe Clark in action, citing, among other examples, his command of the 1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood from 1992 to 1994.

While Clark's official Pentagon biography proclaims his triumph in "transitioning the Division into a rapidly deployable force" this officer describes the "1st Horse Division" as "easily the worst division I have ever seen in 25 years of doing this stuff."

Such strong reactions are common. A major in the 3rd Brigade of the 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson, Colorado when Clark was in command there in the early 1980s described him as a man who "regards each and every one of his subordinates as a potential threat to his career".

While he regards his junior officers with watchful suspicion, he customarily accords the lower ranks little more than arrogant contempt. A veteran of Clark's tenure at Fort Hood recalls the general's "massive tantrum because the privates and sergeants and wives in the crowded (canteen) checkout lines didn't jump out of the way fast enough to let him through".

Clark's demeanor to those above is, of course, very different, a mode of behavior that has earned him rich dividends over the years. Thus, early in 1994, he was a candidate for promotion from two to three star general. Only one hurdle remained - a war game exercise known as the Battle Command Training Program in which Clark would have to maneuver his division against an opposing force. The commander of the opposing force, or "OPFOR" was known for the military skill with which he routinely demolished opponents.

But Clark's patrons on high were determined that no such humiliation should be visited on their favorite. Prior to the exercise therefore, strict orders came down that the battle should go Clark's way. Accordingly, the OPFOR was reduced in strength by half, thus enabling Clark, despite deploying tactics of signal ineptitude, to triumph. His third star came down a few weeks later.

Battle exercises and war games are of course meant to test the fighting skills of commanders and troops. The army's most important venue for such training is the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California, where Clark commanded from October 1989 to October 1991 and where his men derisively nicknamed him "Section Leader Six" for his obsessive micro-management.

At the NTC, army units face a resident OPFOR that has, through constant battle practice coupled with innovative tactics and close knowledge of the terrain, become adept at routing the visiting "Blue Force" opponents. For Clark, this naturally posed a problem. Not only were his men using unconventional tactics, they were also humiliating Blue Force generals who might nurture resentment against the NTC commander and thus discommode his career at some future date. To the disgust of the junior OPFOR officers Clark therefore frequently fought to lose, sending his men on suicidal attacks in order that the Blue Forces should go home happy and owing debts of gratitude to their obliging foe.

All observers agree that Clark has always displayed an obsessive concern with the perquisites and appurtenances of rank. Ever since he acceded to the Nato command post, the entourage with which he travels has accordingly grown to gargantuan proportions to the point where even civilians are beginning to comment. A Senate aide recalls his appearances to testify, prior to which aides scurry about the room adjusting lights, polishing his chair, testing the microphone etc prior to the precisely timed and choreographed moment when the Supreme Allied Commander Europe makes his entrance.

"We are state of the art pomposity and arrogance up here," remarks the aide. "So when a witness displays those traits so egregiously that even the senators notice, you know we're in trouble." His NATO subordinates call him, not with affection, "the Supreme Being".

"Clark is smart," concludes one who has monitored his career. "But his whole life has been spent manipulating appearances (e.g. the doctored OPFOR exercise) in the interests of his career. Now he is faced with a reality he can't control." This observer concludes that, confronted with the wily Slobodan and other unavoidable variables of war, Clark will soon come unglued. "Watch the carpets at NATO HQ for teeth marks."CP

Photos: NATO

Source

Another Great Archive on the 'ol general

Never forget WACO!!!


43 posted on 01/04/2003 4:17:43 PM PST by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ron Paul, Harry Browne, or any other REAL AMERICAN who has worked his/her butt off in the private sector under the corrupt system of the past 37 years.

ANY NATIVE-BORN AMERICAN who VOWS TO UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE US CONSTITUTION - in the manner in which the framers intended.

NO ONE ELSE.

SCREW WESLEY CLARKE, THE TREASONOUS CO-MURDERER.

(If I am to single-handedly save America, I can no longer afford to mince words.)

Have a nice day.

44 posted on 01/04/2003 4:20:52 PM PST by XLurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
WESLEY CLARK AND HIS BUDDY

FELLOW RHODES SCHOLAR BILL CLINTON.


45 posted on 01/04/2003 4:30:27 PM PST by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SrBahamonde
I don't think and I can still see the flare.
BTTT!
46 posted on 01/04/2003 4:35:23 PM PST by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Clark was rewarded for his "bravery" at Waco by the Clintoon and Jake Reno.

He has to be one of the most dangerous Rats alive today! There is no one in America or around the world that he would not shell, blow up and incenerate if he had the power to do so.
47 posted on 01/04/2003 4:39:16 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The guy who almost started World War III?

From The Guardian, Tuesday August 3, 1999:

No sooner are we told by Britain's top generals that the Russians played a crucial role in ending the west's war against Yugoslavia than we learn that if Nato's supreme commander, the American General Wesley Clark, had had his way, British paratroopers would have stormed Pristina airport threatening to unleash the most frightening crisis with Moscow since the end of the cold war.

"I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the international K-For peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital.
*****************************
Also from FR "Gen. Wesley Clark Fights On and On"
48 posted on 01/04/2003 5:05:00 PM PST by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cynaman
IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

RE: William J. Clinton, Madeleine Albright, William S. Cohen, Tony Blair, Robin Cook, George Robertson, Javier Solana, Jamie Shea, Wesley K. Clark, Harold W. German, Konrad Freytag. D.J.G. Wilby, Fabrizio Maltinti, Giuseppe Marani, Daniel P. Leaf, Jean Chrétien, Lloyd Axworthy, Arthur Eggleton, Jean-Luc Dehaene, E. Derycke, J.-P. Poncelet, Vaclav Havel, J. Kavan, V. Vetchy, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, N.H. Petersen, H. Haekkerup, Jacques Chirac, Lionel Jospin, H. Védrine, Alain Richard, Gerhard Schröder, J. Fischer, R. Scharping, Kostas Simitis, G. Papandreou, A. Tsohatzopoulos, Viktor Orban, J. Martonyi, J. Szabo, David Oddsson, H. Asgrimsson, G. Palsson, Massimo D'Alema, L. Dini, C. Scognamiglio, Jean-Claude Juncker, J. Poos, Alex Bodry, Willem Kok, J. van Aartsen, F.H.G. de Grave, Kjell Magne Bondevik, K. Vollebæk, D.J. Fjærvoll, Jerzy Buzek, B. Geremek, J. Onyszkiewicz, Antonio Manuel de Oliveira Guterres, J.J. Matos da Gama, V. Simão, Jose Maria Aznar, A. Matutes, E. Serra Rexach, Bulent Ecevit, I. Cem and H. S. Turk.

NOTICE OF THE EXISTENCE OF INFORMATION CONCERNING SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL;

REQUEST THAT THE PROSECUTOR INVESTIGATE NAMED INDIVIDUALS FOR VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND PREPARE INDICTMENTS AGAINST THEM PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 18.1 AND 18.4 OF THE TRIBUNAL STATUTE.

TO:

Madam Justice Louise Arbour,
Prosecutor,
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia,
Churchillplein 1, 2501 EW,
The Hague,
Netherlands.

AND TO:

William J. Clinton, Madeleine Albright and William S. Cohen,
C/o William J. Clinton
President
The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, District of Columbia 20500
United States of America

Tony Blair, Robin Cook and George Robertson,
C/o Rt. Hon. Tony Blair
Prime Minister
10 Downing St.
SW1A 2AA London
United Kingdom

Javier Solana, Jamie Shea, Wesley K. Clark, Harold W. German, Konrad Freytag. D.J.G. Wilby, Fabrizio Maltinti, Giuseppe Marani and Daniel P. Leaf,
C/o Javier Solana, Secretary General
NATO
NATO Headquarters,
1110 Brussels,
Belgium

Jean Chrétien, Lloyd Axworthy and Arthur Eggleton,
C/o Jean Chretien, M.P.
Prime Minister
House of Commons, PO Box 1103
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Canada

Jean-Luc Dehaene, E. Derycke and J.-P. Poncelet,
C/o M. Jean-Luc Dehaene
Premier Ministre
rue de la Loi 16
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium

Vaclav Havel, J. Kavan and V. Vetchy,
C/o Vaclav Havel
President
Office of the President of the C.R.
Hrad (Castle)
119 08 Praha 1
Czech Republic

Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, N.H. Petersen and H. Haekkerup,
C/o Poul Nyrup Rasmussen
Prime Minister
Prime Minister`s Office
Christiansborg, Prins Jorgens Gaard 11
DK-1218 Copenhagen
Denmark
Jacques Chirac, Lionel Jospin, H. Védrine and Alain Richard,
C/o M. Jacques Chirac
President de la Republique
Palais de l`Elysee
55 et 57, rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore
75008 Paris
France

Gerhard Schröder, J. Fischer and R. Scharping,
C/o Gerhard Schoeder
Chancellor
Adenauerallee 141
PA: Briefpost, PLZ 53106
53113 Bonn
Germany

Kostas Simitis, G. Papandreou and A. Tsohatzopoulos,
C/o Kostas Simitis
Prime Minister
Office of the Prime Minister
Greek Parliament Bldg., Constitution Square
Athens
Greece

Viktor Orban, J. Martonyi and J. Szabo,
C/oViktor Orban
Prime Minister
Kossuth Lajos ter 1-3
1055 Budapest, Budapest fovaros
Hungary

David Oddsson, H. Asgrimsson and G. Palsson,
C/o David Oddsson
Prime Minister
Office of the Prime Minister
Stjornarradshusinu
150 Reykjavik
Iceland

Massimo D'Alema, L. Dini and C. Scognamiglio,
C/o Massimo D'Alema
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (Prime Minister)
Piazza Colonna, 370
00187 Rome
Italy
Jean-Claude Juncker, J. Poos and Alex Bodry,
C/o Jean-Claude Juncker
Prime Minister
Ministere d`Etat
4, rue de la Congregation
L-2910 Luxembourg
Luxembourg

Willem Kok, J. van Aartsen and F.H.G. de Grave,
C/o Willem Kok
Prime Minister
Binnenhof 20, 2513 AA
Postbus 20001, 2500 EA
The Hague
Netherlands

Kjell Magne Bondevik, K. Vollebæk and D.J. Fjærvoll,
C/o Kjell Magne Bondevik
Prime Minister
Akersgt. 42, blokk H
P.O. Box 8001 Dep
N-0030 Oslo
Norway

Jerzy Buzek, B. Geremek and J. Onyszkiewicz,
C/o Jerzy Buzek
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's Office
al. Ujazdowskie 1/3
00-583 Warsaw
Poland

Antonio Manuel de Oliveira Guterres, J.J. Matos da Gama and V. Simão,
C/o Antonio Manuel de Oliveira Guterres
Prime Minister
Gabinete do Primeiro-Ministro
Lisboa
Portugal

Jose Maria Aznar, A. Matutes and E. Serra Rexach,
C/o Excmo. Sr. Jose Maria Aznar
Presidente del Gobierno
Complejo de la Moncloa
Edf. Semillas
28071 Madrid
Spain

Bulent Ecevit, I. Cem and H. S. Turk,
C/o Bulent Ecevit
Prime Minister
Office of the Prime Minister
Basbakanlik
06573 Ankara
Turkey

FROM:

Professor Michael Mandel, Professor W. Neil Brooks, Professor Judith A. Fudge, Professor H. J. Glasbeek, Professor Reuben A. Hasson and Sil Salvaterra, Barrister and Solicitor, Community Legal Aid Services Programme,
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University,
Toronto, Ontario,
Canada M3J 1P3

David Jacobs and Brian Shell, Barristers and Solicitors,
Shell, Jacobs Lawyers
672 Dupont Street,
Suite 401
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M6G 1Z6

Christopher Black, Barrister and Solicitor,
121 Nymark Avenue,
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M2J 2H3

John Philpot, Barrister and Solicitor,
Alariel Legault Beachemin Paquin Jobin Brisson & Philpot
1259 rue Berri suite 1000
Montréal, Québec
Canada H2L 4C7
Fred Stasiuk, Barrister and Solicitor,
296 Mill Road,
Unit B6
Etobicoke, Ontario,
Canada M9G 4X8

Professor Peter Rosenthal, Barrister and Solicitor,
Mathematics Department,
The University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario
Canada

Professor Roberto Bergalli,
Departament de Dret Penal i Ciences Penals
Universitat de Barcelona,
Av. Diagonal 684 E-08034
Barcelona, Spain

The American Association of Jurists:
Alejandro Teitelbaum,
Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva.
80 Quai Gillet
69004 Lyon, France

Alvaro Ramirez Gonzalez, President,
Del Porton Oriental de la UCA 1 y media cuadra arriba
Apdo Postal 3348
Managua, Nicaragua

Vanessa Ramos,
Secretary General
200 Mercer Street 4E
New York, NY 10012

Beinusz Szmukler,
President, Consultative Council,
Peru 971 8 piso, B
1068 Buenos Aires, Argentina

IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

RE: William J. Clinton, Madeleine Albright, William S. Cohen, Tony Blair, Robin Cook, George Robertson, Javier Solana, Jamie Shea, Wesley K. Clark, Harold W. German, Konrad Freytag. D.J.G. Wilby, Fabrizio Maltinti, Giuseppe Marani, Daniel P. Leaf, Jean Chrétien, Lloyd Axworthy, Arthur Eggleton, Jean-Luc Dehaene, E. Derycke, J.-P. Poncelet, Vaclav Havel, J. Kavan, V. Vetchy, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, N.H. Petersen, H. Haekkerup, Jacques Chirac, Lionel Jospin, H. Védrine, Alain Richard, Gerhard Schröder, J. Fischer, R. Scharping, Kostas Simitis, G. Papandreou, A. Tsohatzopoulos, Viktor Orban, J. Martonyi, J. Szabo, David Oddsson, H. Asgrimsson, G. Palsson, Massimo D'Alema, L. Dini, C. Scognamiglio, Jean-Claude Juncker, J. Poos, Alex Bodry, Willem Kok, J. van Aartsen, F.H.G. de Grave, Kjell Magne Bondevik, K. Vollebæk, D.J. Fjærvoll, Jerzy Buzek, B. Geremek, J. Onyszkiewicz, Antonio Manuel de Oliveira Guterres, J.J. Matos da Gama, V. Simão, Jose Maria Aznar, A. Matutes, E. Serra Rexach, Bulent Ecevit, I. Cem and H. S. Turk.

NOTICE OF THE EXISTENCE OF INFORMATION CONCERNING SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL;

REQUEST THAT THE PROSECUTOR INVESTIGATE NAMED INDIVIDUALS FOR VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND PREPARE INDICTMENTS AGAINST THEM PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 18.1 AND 18.4 OF THE TRIBUNAL STATUTE.

 

 

WHEREAS the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 was established by the UN Security Council with "the power to prosecute persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 in accordance with the provisions of" its Statute (Article 1);

AND WHEREAS by Article 2 of the said Statute, the Tribunal has the power "to prosecute persons committing or ordering to be committed grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention" including the following:

(a) wilful killing;
(c) wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health;
(d) extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.

AND WHEREAS by Article 3 of the said Statute, "the International Tribunal shall have the
power to prosecute persons violating the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include,
but not be limited to:

(a) employment of poisonous weapons or other weapons to cause unnecessary suffering;
(b) wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;
(c) attack, or bombardment, by whatever means, of undefended towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings;
(d) seizure of, destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to religion, charity
and education, the arts and sciences, historic monuments and works of art and science.

AND WHEREAS by Article 6 of the said Statute "the International Tribunal shall have jurisdiction over natural persons pursuant to the provisions of the present Statute;"

AND WHEREAS Article 7 of the said Statute provides for individual criminal responsibility thus:

1. A person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of a crime referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statute, shall be individually responsible for the crime.
2. The official position of any accused person, whether as Head of State or Government or
as a responsible Government official, shall not relieve such person of criminal responsibility
or mitigate punishment.
3. The fact that any of the acts referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statute was committed by a subordinate does not relieve his superior of criminal responsibility if he knew or had reason to know that the subordinate was about to commit such acts or had done so and the superior failed to take the necessary and reasonable measures to prevent such acts or to punish the perpetrators thereof.
4. The fact that an accused person acted pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior shall not relieve him of criminal responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the International Tribunal determines that justice so requires.

AND WHEREAS Article 8 of the said Statute provides that the territorial and temporal jurisdiction of the Tribunal "shall extend to the territory of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, including its land surface, airspace and territorial waters. The temporal jurisdiction of the International Tribunal shall extend to a period beginning on 1 January 1991;"

AND WHEREAS by Article 9 of the said Statute "the International Tribunal and national courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute persons for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1 January 1991" but the International Tribunal "shall have primacy over national courts;"

AND WHEREAS Article 18 of the said Statute provides inter alia that:

1. The Prosecutor shall initiate investigations ex-officio or on the basis of information obtained from any source, particularly from Governments, United Nations organs, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations. The Prosecutor shall assess the information received or obtained and decide whether there is sufficient basis to proceed.
2. The Prosecutor shall have the power to question suspects, victims and witnesses, to collect evidence and to conduct on-site investigations. In carrying out these tasks, the Prosecutor may, as appropriate, seek the assistance of the State authorities concerned.
4. Upon a determination that a prima facie case exists, the Prosecutor shall prepare an indictment containing a concise statement of the facts and the crime or crimes with which the accused is charged under the Statute. The indictment shall be transmitted to a judge of the Trial Chamber.

AND WHEREAS the President of the Tribunal, Judge Gabrielle Kirk McDonald, in a press release of April 8, 1999, urged that:

All States and organisations in possession of information pertaining to the alleged commission of crimes within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal should make such information available without delay to the Prosecutor.

AND WHEREAS on April 30 in Geneva the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson in a speech to the Commission cited a letter from the Prosecutor in which the Prosecutor stated:

The actions of individuals belonging to Serb forces, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), or NATO may º come under scrutiny, if it appears that serious violations of international humanitarian law have occurred.

AND WHEREAS High Commissioner Robinson also stated in her speech:

In the NATO bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, large numbers of civilians have incontestably been killed, civilian installations targeted on the grounds that they are or could be of military application and NATO remains sole judge of what is or is not acceptable to bombºIn this situation, the principle of proportionality must be adhered to by those carrying out the bombing campaign. It surely must be right to ask those carrying out the bombing campaign to weigh the consequences of their campaign for civilians in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

AND WHEREAS NATO has carried out between 5,000 and 10,000 bombing missions over the territories of the former Yugoslavia since March 24, 1999;

AND WHEREAS NATO leaders have openly admitted targeting civilian infrastructure as well as military targets;

AND WHEREAS the list of targets has included fuel depots, oil refineries, government offices, power stations and communications links, such as roads, tunnels, bridges and railway links, including those not inside the region of, or in the vicinity of, Kosovo;

AND WHEREAS in addition to these deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and objects, there have been a great number of attacks which have caused direct physical harm and death to civilians;

AND WHEREAS it appears that these bombing missions have directly caused the death of approximately 1,000 civilian men, women and children and serious injury to 4,500 more;

AND WHEREAS instances of this nature include the 12 April bombing of a train travelling from Belgrade to Ristovac as it crossed the bridge spanning the Yuzhna Morava river at the Grdelica gorge, killing at least 10 passengers and wounding 16; the 15 April bombing of a refugee convoy in four separate locations along a 12 mile stretch of the road that runs from Prizren to Djakovica, killing approximately 74 people; the 23 April bombing of Serbian Television editorial offices, killing approximately 15 people; the 27 April bombing of a residential district in Surdulica, killing 16 people including 12 children; and the May 1 bombing of a bus on the Luzan bridge in Kosovo killing at least 34 people including 15 children;

AND WHEREAS, though the above-named NATO leaders have claimed that these incidents were accidents, they have also admitted that they were an inevitable result of their bombing strategy, a strategy which they appear to have continued unmodified and even to have intensified throughout these incidents;

AND WHEREAS there is ample evidence in the public statements of NATO leaders that these attacks on civilian targets are part of a deliberate attempt to terrorize the population to turn it against its leadership;

AND WHEREAS the NATO bombing has done an estimated $100 billion dollars in property damage and completely destroyed or seriously damaged dozens of bridges, railways and railway stations, major roads, airports, including civilian airports, hospitals and health care centres, television transmitters, medieval monasteries and religious shrines, cultural-historical monuments and museums, hundreds of schools, faculties and facilities for students and children, thousands of dwellings and civilian industrial and agricultural facilities;

AND WHEREAS refineries and warehouses storing liquid raw materials and chemicals have been hit causing environmental contamination and exposing the civilian population to the emission of poisonous gases;

AND WHEREAS the NATO bombings have also made use of weapons banned by international convention, including cruise missiles utilizing depleted uranium highly toxic to human beings;

AND WHEREAS credible detailed reports of the civilian death and destruction inflicted by the NATO bombing are attached as an Annex to this Notice;

AND WHEREAS THEREFORE there is abundant evidence that many instances of serious violations of international humanitarian law within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal have been committed by NATO forces in the attack on Yugoslavia commencing March 24 and continuing to this day;

AND WHEREAS this evidence is readily available to the Prosecutor in eyewitness, videotaped, televised and publicly broadcast reports, in press reports and on the Internet, and in the evidence presented by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in its current complaint against the NATO countries before the International Court of Justice;

AND WHEREAS all of the above-named persons, Heads of State and Government of the 19 NATO countries, their Foreign Ministers and Ministers of Defence, and officials and military leaders of NATO, have admitted publicly to having agreed upon and ordered these actions, being fully aware of their nature and effects;

AND WHEREAS the above-named persons have acted in open violation of the United Nations Charter, which provides in so far as is relevant:

Article 2
3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Article 33
1. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.

Article 37
1. Should the parties to a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 fail to settle it by the means indicated in that Article, they shall refer it to the Security Council.
2. If the Security Council deems that the continuance of the dispute is in fact likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, it shall decide whether to take action under Article 36 or to recommend such terms of settlement as it may consider appropriate.

Article 39
The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Article 41
The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.

Article 42
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.

Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security;

AND WHEREAS the International Court of Justice has stated in ruling against United States intervention in Nicaragua:

In any event, while the United States might form its own appraisal of the situation as to respect for human rights in Nicaragua, the use of force could not be the appropriate method to monitor or ensure such respect. With regard to the steps actually taken, the protection of human rights, a strictly humanitarian objective, cannot be compatible with de mining of ports, the destruction of oil installations, or again with de training, arming and equipping of the contras.

(CASE CONCERNING THE MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) (MERITS) Judgment of 27 June 1986, I.C.J. Reports, 1986, p.134-135, paragraphs 267 and 268)

AND WHEREAS the above-named persons, Heads of State and Government of the 19 NATO countries, their Foreign Ministers and Ministers of Defence, and officials and military leaders of NATO have acted in open violation of the NATO Treaty which provides in so far as is relevant:

Article 1
The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

Article 7
This Treaty does not affect, and shall not be interpreted as affecting in any way the rights and obligations under the Charter of the Parties which are members of the United Nations, or the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security;

AND WHEREAS the above-named persons have acted in open violation of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977, which provides as follows:
Art 51. - Protection of the civilian population
1. The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations. To give effect to this protection, the following rules, which are additional to other applicable rules of international law, shall be observed in all circumstances.

2. The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.

3. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.

4. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. Indiscriminate attacks are:
(a) those which are not directed at a specific military objective;
(b) those which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or
(c) those which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by this Protocol;

and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.

5. Among others, the following types of attacks are to be considered as indiscriminate:
(a) an attack by bombardment by any methods or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects;

and

(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.

Art 79. Measures or protection for journalists
1. Journalists engaged in dangerous professional missions in areas of armed conflict shall be considered as civilians within the meaning of Article 50, paragraph 1.

Article 85 - Repression of breaches of this Protocol
3. In addition to the grave breaches defined in Article 11, the following acts shall be regarded as grave breaches of this Protocol, when committed wilfully, in violation of the relevant provisions of this Protocol, and causing death or serious injury to body or health:
(a) making the civilian population or individual civilians the object of attack;
(b) launching an indiscriminate attack affecting the civilian population or civilian objects in the knowledge that such attack will cause excessive loss of life, injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects, as defined in Article 57, paragraph 2 (a)(iii);

5. Without prejudice to the application of the Conventions and of this Protocol, grave breaches of these instruments shall be regarded as war crimes.

AND WHEREAS the above-named persons have acted in open violation of the Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nüremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, as adopted by the General Assembly of the united Nations (1950), which provide in so far as is relevant:

Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

Principle IV
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

Principle VI
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war include, but are not limited to, murder wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

Principle VII
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law;

THEREFORE we respectfully request that the Prosecutor immediately investigate and indict for serious crimes against international humanitarian law:

THE FOLLOWING HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT, MINISTERS OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND MINISTERS OF DEFENCE OF THE NATO COUNTRIES: William J. Clinton, Madeleine Albright, William S. Cohen (United States of America), Tony Blair, Robin Cook, George Robertson (United Kingdom), Jean Chrétien, Lloyd Axworthy, Arthur Eggleton (Canada), Jean-Luc Dehaene, E. Derycke, J.-P. Poncelet (Belgium), Vaclav Havel, J. Kavan, V. Vetchy (Czech Republic), Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, N.H. Petersen, H. Haekkerup (Denmark), Jacques Chirac, Lionel Jospin, H. Védrine, Alain Richard (France), Gerhard Schröder, J. Fischer, R. Scharping (Germany), Kostas Simitis, G. Papandreou, A. Tsohatzopoulos (Greece), Viktor Orban, J. Martonyi, J. Szabo (Hungary), David Oddsson, H. Asgrimsson, G. Palsson (Iceland), Massimo D'Alema, L. Dini, C. Scognamiglio (Italy), Jean-Claude Juncker, J. Poos, Alex Bodry (Luxembourg), Willem Kok, J. van Aartsen, F.H.G. de Grave (Netherlands), Kjell Magne Bondevik, K. Vollebæk, D.J. Fjærvoll (Norway), Jerzy Buzek, B. Geremek, J. Onyszkiewicz (Poland), Antonio Manuel de Oliveira Guterres, J.J. Matos da Gama, V. Simão (Portugal), Jose Maria Aznar, A. Matutes, E. Serra Rexach (Spain), Bulent Ecevit, I. Cem and H. S. Turk (Turkey);

AND THE FOLLOWING OFFICIALS AND MILITARY LEADERS OF NATO: Javier Solana, Jamie Shea, Wesley K. Clark, Harold W. German, Konrad Freytag, D.J.G. Wilby, Fabrizio Maltinti, Giuseppe Marani and Daniel P. Leaf;

AND WHOEVER ELSE shall be determined by the Prosecutor's investigations to have committed crimes in the NATO attack on Yugoslavia commencing March 24, 1999.

Respectfully submitted, this 6th day of May, 1999__________________________
Michael Mandel
(Professor)
for
W. Neil Brooks
Judith A. Fudge
H. J. Glasbeek
Reuben A. Hasson
(Professors)
Sil Salvaterra
David Jacobs
Brian Shell
Christopher Black
John Philpot
Fred Stasiuk
(Barristers and Solicitors)
Peter Rosenthal
(Professor, Barrister and Solicitor)
Roberto Bergalli (Professor)
Alejandro Teitelbaum
Alvaro Ramirez Gonzalez
Vanessa Ramos
Beinusz Szmukler
(American Association of Jurists)
ANNEX: CIVILIAN DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

The following are two reports from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (a designated source of information under Article 18.1 of the Stature of the Tribunal): 1) NATO Crimes Against Civilians and Civilian Infrastructure in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS YUGOSLAV DAILY SURVEY - www.mfa.gov.yu/Bilteni/Engleski/si290499_1-e.html); and 2) Civilian Victims and Devastation in NATO Aggression on Yugoslavia (SERBIAINFO - www.serbia-info.com/news/1999-04/23/11210.html)

NATO CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS AND CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA (April 29, 1999)

The NATO criminal aggression represents the most flagrant violation
of the Charter of the United Nations since the inception of the
world Organization, a violation of the Helsinki Final Act and the
undermining of the very foundations of the international legal
order. At the same time, this aggression is a crime against peace,
stability and humanity.

The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has warned on time the United
Nations Security Council of a possible aggression, and during the
aggression itself it requested that it be immediately halted and
most strongly condemned. Had this legitimate request of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia been met, enormous human sufferings and
destruction would have been avoided. The most illustrative examples
are given below.

KILLING AND PLIGHT OF THE CIVILIANS
During the last thirty-six days of NATO aggression, the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia has been exposed to extensive civilian
destruction, unprecedented in modern history of the world. NATO
aggressors have focused their attacks primarily on civilian targets,
directly threatening the lives and fundamental human rights of the
entire population of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. By bombing
relentlessly the cities, towns and villages throughout Yugoslavia,
the NATO aggressor has killed so far, in nine hundred attacks, more
than a thousand civilians, including a great number of children.
Over five thousand people sustained injuries, many of whom will
remain crippled for life. At the same time, several thousand private
homes and flats have been ruined, mostly in Belgrade, Nis, Cuprija,
Aleksinac, Pristina, etc. We shall present the most tragic instances
of the killings and plight of the innocent civilian population.
Fifty-five passengers were killed and twenty-six injured in an
international passenger train on the Belgrade-Thessaloniki line.
More than four hundred civilians were killed by NATO bombs in
Kosmet: in the centre of Pristina, in Djakovica, Prizren, Kosovo
Polje, Urosevac, Kosovska Mitrovica, in refugee camps in Orahovac
and Srbica, Vitina, etc.

Thirteen civilians were killed and twenty-five wounded in an attack
on Kursumlija.

Twelve civilians were killed and forty wounded in the bombing of Aleksinac.
Sixteen RTS workers were killed and seventeen wounded in the bombing
of the headquarters of this biggest Radio and Television outlets in
the FRY. Unfortunately, the final number of victims has not been
established yet since more victims have remained buried in the
rubble.

In Pancevo, Cacak, Vranje and Nis the number of casualties has been
increasing each day.

KILLING OF CHILDREN
Children are the most vulnerable category of the population,
innocent and defenceless which suffer in particular due to the
barbaric bombing of NATO aircraft, which is illustrated by the
following examples:

The killing of seven children in Srbica from cluster bombs;
The killing of five children from the Kodza family in the village of
Doganovici near Urosevac on 24 April 1999 as a result of the delayed
effect of bombs (Edon, aged 3, Fisnik, aged 9, Osman, aged 13,
Burim, aged 14 and Vajdet, aged 15. Six other children were also
injured in the same incident, two of them were seriously wounded.

The killing of a three-year old Milica Rakic in the Belgrade suburb
of Batajnica;
The killing of six children in the refugee centre in Djakovica and
19 children in the refugee column on the Prizren-Djakovica road;

The death of a child in Kosovo Polje;
The killing of five years old girl Arta Lugic while her brothers
Neron and Egzon and her sister Arijeta were seriously wounded in
Lipljane;

The killing of nine children in Kursumlija;
The killing of two children in Aleksinac, as well as other numerous
examples.

Children are most often victims of the sprinkle cluster bombs with
delayed effect. The death toll on children would have been even more
tragic, had the missile struck the biggest Maternity Hospital in
Belgrade (It exploded some thirty metres away from the Hospital).

KILLING AND PLIGHT OF REFUGEES
Particularly tragic is the fate of refugees, who convinced that they
should not believe the propaganda ploys on the alleged "ethnic
cleansing" decided to return to their homes. Legitimate authorities
of the FRY encourage them every day to do so and guarantee their
safety. On the occasion of a return of a large group of refugees, on
14 April, on the Djakovica-Prizren road, NATO aircraft killed 75
citizens of the FRY and wounded 111. The attack of NATO aircraft was
systematically prepared and lasted for three hours. In this way,
NATO has in the most brutal way "demonstrated" that the story of
"humanitarian catastrophe" suits it only if it fits in the
legitimate aggression on the FRY, as well as that innocent civilians
are constantly taken advantage of for NATO interests in the Balkans.

In addition, NATO bombed several refugee camps in which Serbs
expelled from Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina were accommodated
(Djakovica, Pristina, Kursumlija, etc). Several dozens of refugees
were killed, mostly children and the frail, ruthlessly ending their
tragedy which came about in the wake of the break-up of Yugoslavia.

BOMBING OF SURDULICA
The aggressors war planes bombed at noon, on 27 April 1999, the
residential area of the town of Surdulica. On that occasion 16
citizens were killed (including 12 children), while several dozen
were wounded out of which twenty persons remained in hospital for
further medical treatment. Hundreds of houses were raised to the
ground or damaged. Special teams are still clearing up the debris so
that it is not possible at the moment to estimate the real
proportions of this notorious crime.

ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ON PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC
An assassination attempt on the President of the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia on 22 April 1999 represents an organised terrorist act
without precedent in the history of modern Europe. This is not only
a crime against a Head of a sovereign State, but primarily an attack
on the democratically expressed will of a people and thus against
the foundations of the democratic values of the civilisation.
Although the residence of the President of the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia was targeted, this attack has also a symbolic meaning as
if the targets had been the homes of all Yugoslav citizens. This
crime has caused abhorrence and condemnation by international
public. However, it is incomprehensible that the United Nations
Security Council has remained silent and failed to condemn this
terrorist act or the killings of civilians and children.

CRIME AGAINST THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH
The destruction of more than ten private radio and television
stations, two dozen TV transmitters, as well as the bombing of the
Radio and Television of Serbia building on 23 April 1999 represents
the biggest aggression against freedom of thought and a disgrace to
the civilization at the threshold of a third millennium.
Transmitters at Iriski venac, Krnjaca, Mt Cer, Bukulja, Tornik, Crni
vrh, Jasetrebac, Ovcar, Grmija and others were destroyed, so that
the transmitter infrastructure at the entire territory of Serbia was
severely damaged. Two times in six days the studios and transmitter
located at the business centre "Usce" which housed TV stations: BK
TV, Pink, Kosava and SOS Channel, as well as several other radio
stations were bombed.

Transmitter of the TV station Palma was bombed and destroyed on 28
April 1999.

The satellite station "Yugoslavia" in the village of Prilike near
Ivanjica was severely damaged.

BOMBING OF THE BUILDING OF THE RADIO AND
TELEVISION OF SERBIA The building was demolished taking a heavy toll
during the bombing of the largest Radio and TV company in the
Balkans with 7000 employees and the state-of-the-art infrastructure
which was made available to hundreds of foreign correspondence. The
aim of this crime, in which 16 RTS workers were killed and 19
wounded, was more than obvious: to suppress the right to a different
opinion and its being publicly expressed with a view to pursuing
further war-mongering manipulation with the world public. Clearly,
the intention of NATO aggressors is to prevent the world public from
learning the extensive scope of their crimes and to impose on the
world their totalitarian and single-minded perception. Many
newspapers in the world and renowned journalists have already raised
their voice against the propaganda fabrications of the NATO
aggressors.

For all champions of the freedom of speech and for all people
committed to the right to freedom of expression, this destructive
act represents the last warning alarm before NATO generals take
control over the aggressors' media.

DESTRUCTION OF VITAL YUGOSLAV ECONOMIC FACILITIES According to the assessment of experts from Western countries, the
damage done to date by NATO air strikes is well in excess of one
hundred billion US dollars. By the destruction of factories,
business capacities and production facilities, more than half a
million people have lost their jobs and over two million of them
remained without any kind of income. Destroyed are the industrial
complexes in Belgrade, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Nis, Pancevo, Cacak,
Kraljevo, Valjevo, Pristina, Vranje, Kursumlija, Krusevac, Kula,
Gnjilane, Sremska Mitrovica and in other towns and cities.
The petrochemical industry of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has
been totally destroyed, as well as the largest Yugoslav factory of
artificial fertilisers.
Private entrepreneurs are a particular target of NATO aggression and
the most glaring example of it is the destruction of the "Usce"
business centre in Novi Beograd which was hit on 21 and 27 April
1999. That was one of the biggest business centres in the Balkans,
which housed more than a hundred newly established private firms in
full business expansion, foreign representative offices, seven
private Radio and TV stations and one of the most modern
poli-clinics in the FRY. The building of this business centre is
also one of the landmarks of modern Belgrade.

DESTRUCTION OF BRIDGES
On the false pretext of "neutralizing the military power of the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia", the NATO aggressor started
systematic destruction of the major Yugoslav road and rail traffic
routes. About 20 bridges have been totally demolished so far and a
few dozen of them have been damaged. Also, several dozen major and
local roads, airports, railway tracks, railway stations, etc. have
been destroyed. All ruined facilities were part of costly capital
investments, into which the resources and the efforts of several
generations of Yugoslav citizens were pooled. All the facilities are
strategic part of the European traffic infrastructure, and some of
them are of historical and cultural importance ("The Wailing Bridge
" in Novi Sad, on which the Fascists killed several thousand Jews in
the Second World War).

About 30 bridges have been destroyed including those at the
strategic European E-75 corridor. By the destruction of the bridges
on the Danube river the aggressors have blocked the entire river
navigation at this traffic artery of the greatest importance for
European economy and the shortest link between the Northern and
Mediterranean sea (The Rhein-Mein-Danube route). Thus, the European
shipping companies suffer each day the damage of over 20 million DM.

Examples: Sloboda Bridge, Wailing Bridge, Zezelj Bridge and the
bridge in Beska (all in the city of Novi Sad), several bridges on
the Ibar primary road and on the major railway lines.

ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER
Concurrently with the humanitarian, NATO strikes have caused an
environmental catastrophe which is endangering not only the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia, but also the neighbouring countries and the
entire European continent. Ecology does not recognize boundaries.
The NATO aggressor is thus teetering on the brink of another
Chernobyl in the heart of Europe. The destruction of petrochemical
installations, the warehouses storing semi-processed and finished
products of the chemical industry have already caused significant
adverse effects on the health of the population of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia and the neighbouring countries. During some
of the air strikes it was pure luck that an environmental
catastrophe was not provoked spreading all over Europe.
The aggressor's attacks did not spare even huge forests, tourist
centres and the national parks on the mountains of Serbia (Kopaonik,
Zlatibor, Divcibare, Tara, Prokletije, Sara, Fruska Gora). The ozone
layer was depleted by the exhaust gases. The Black Sea, Aegean and
the Adriatic basins, practically the entire Mediterranean, are
threatened by environmental pollution.

Examples: Nitrogen factory in Pancevo, the oil refineries in Pancevo
and Novi Sad, the chemical company "Prva iskra" in Baric and others.

HOSPITALS AND HEALTH INSTITUTIONS
The aggressors' bombings, calculated to provoke the greatest
possible confusion and panic among innocent people, have damaged
many clinical and hospital centres, inflicting not only great
material damage to property (destruction of buildings and expensive
medical equipment), but also causing new health problems and
intensifying psychological traumas among the sick people. The
destruction of all the three bridges in Novi Sad totally cut off and
left, without the supply of water, the largest Yugoslav centre for
the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, to which several million
people gravitate. The Maternity Hospital in Belgrade, and the
biggest hospital in the Balkans (Military Medical Academy Hospital -
VMA), and the Orthopaedic hospital of Banjica, the hospitals in
Cuprija and Aleksinac, as well as the medical centres in Pristina
and in many other towns were damaged.

DESTRUCTION OF PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS, SCHOOLS
AND UNIVERSITIES
Since the outset of the aggression, NATO has put a stop to the
education of close to one million pupils and students in Yugoslavia.
Over three hundred facilities built for the education and upbringing
of children and young people of all ages were destroyed. This will
inevitably be reflected on the development and social integration of
young people. Hard hit are university centre in Nis (Machine
Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electronical, Technical, Law and
Economics faculties), in Pristina (Agricultural and Machine
Engineering faculty) and Novi Sad (Faculty of Philosophy).

DESTRUCTION OF WORLD CULTURAL HERITAGE
ON THE SOIL OF THE FR OF YUGOSLAVIA
Kosovo and Metohija in particular, but also the entire territory of
the FR of Yugoslavia, is a treasury of European culture and
civilization since ancient times. By violating all international
conventions on the protection of civilization and its heritage, and
in the pursuit of the spirit of aggressive nihilism and new
barbarity, more than 50 monasteries and churches have been severely
damaged thus far, as well as a couple of dozen of other cultural and
historic monuments, some under UNESCO protection. Severe damage was
caused to the monastery of the Patriarchate of Pec (12th century),
Zica (13th century), Decani and Gracanica (14th century, under
UNSECO protection), medieval towns of Zvecan (13th century) and
Smederevo (15th century), Petrovaradin fortress (18th century),
seventeen monasteries on Fruska Gora (15-18th century) and many
other priceless historical monuments. The bombs have even destroyed
many cemeteries all across Yugoslavia.

USE OF PROHIBITED WEAPONS
In NATO attacks, the state-of-the-art weapons have been used, but
also those prohibited under international conventions, such as
cluster bombs and slow activating bombs. In a month-long attacks on
civilian and other facilities in Serbia, NATO aircraft fired more
than 3,500 missiles, including 60 containers with 14,400 cluster
bombs. As many as 3,600 cluster bombs were used in the attacks
against towns in Kosmet - Pristina, Urosevac, Djakovica, Prizren
etc, and many other places and facilities in Serbia. Before the
attacks, radio locators were dropped from the aircraft, found in the
vicinity of many civilian and business facilities in Serbia.
CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN NATO AND TERRORISTS OF THE SO-CALLED "KLA"
While before the onset of the aggression Albanian terrorists counted
on NATO aircraft as air support to their armed groups, now arming,
equipping and transport of Albanians living in the USA and other
western countries is under way, for actions in the FRY, with a view
to making armed formations from them to serve as ground troops of
the "Alliance". Albanian terrorists are being trained and armed in
the camps in northern Albania - in Tropoje, Kukes and Bajram Curri
(they are trained by British, US and Turkish commandos), and then
illegally infiltrated into Kosovo and Metohija. Such activity, in
direct violation of the resolutions of Security Council, has been
particularly stepped up in April when concrete plans for ground
invasion against the FRY started to be hatched. So far, several
hundred terrorists have been transported from the USA to Albania.
Plans are made to equip, arm and train for coordinated actions with
NATO, around 6,000 Albanians. According to western sources, Albanian
terrorists represent the main source of intelligence for NATO, of
military character or those aimed at spreading propaganda against
our country.

At the moment it is difficult to perceive and evaluate all the
humanitarian, economic, environmental, health and other consequences
of the NATO criminal aggression against the FR of Yugoslavia. The
greatest victim of the aggression is the entire Yugoslav people and
its material and cultural resources. At the same time, the violation
of the Charter of the United Nations, the NATO has created a
precedent which may a cast a shadow over the future of all peoples
and sovereign States. The cause for concern is all the grater
because, by combining pressure and promises, NATO is drawing an
increasing number of countries into its aggression against the FR of
Yugoslavia, which will have long-term negative consequences on the
future relations and co-operation between all Southeast European
countries. Attempts by NATO to justify its brutal aggression by an
alleged care for the refugees may bring about an irreversible
degradation of the United Nations and involve this highest
international forum in the crime against a country which is one of
its founding members.

 

CIVILIAN VICTIMS AND DEVASTATION IN NATO AGGRESSION ON YUGOSLAVIA (April 23, 1999)

OVERVIEW OF DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIAN TARGETS ON THE TERRITORY OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA AS A RESULT OF BARBARIC AND CRIMINAL AGGRESSION BY NATO, FROM 24 MARCH TO 19 APRIL 1999

CIVILIAN CASUALTIES

From the onset of NATO aggression against our country up to 19 April 1999, the North Atlantic Alliance made over 7,000 criminal attacks against the territory of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 700 warplanes, of which 530 combat planes, were used; more than 2000 cruise missiles were launched and over 6,000 tons of explosives were dropped.
About 500 civilians were killed and more than 4,000 sustained serious injuries e.g.: in Kursumlija: 13 dead and 25 wounded;
in Pancevo: 2 dead and 4 wounded;
in Cacak: one dead and 7 wounded;
in Kragujevac: over 120 workers were wounded during an attack on the car factory "Zastava";
in Vranje: two dead and 23 wounded;
in Aleksinac: 12 dead and more than 40 wounded;
in Nagavac village, Orahovac municipality: 11 dead and 5 wounded;
in Pristina: 10 dead and 8 wounded;
Grdelicka gorge: 55 killed and 16 wounded;
attack on two refugee columns, with four cruise missiles, on the
Djakovica-Prizren road: 75 killed and 100 wounded, of whom 26 critically;
in the village of Srbica: 10 killed, among whom 7 children;
Belgrade suburb of Batajnica: a three year old girl was killed,and
five civilians wounded.


Three million children are endangered in our country as a result of war and bombardment by NATO criminals.
After these barbarian attacks hundreds of thousands citizens have
been exposed to poisonous gasses which can have a lasting
consequences on the health of the entire population and the
environment.
After the demolition of the Petrovaradin bridge, Novi Sad and
Petrovaradin were cut of water supply (600 000 citizens) since the
main and city pipeline was constructed into the bridge. About one
million citizens in our country are short of water supply due to the bombardment of NATO aggressors.


About 500 000 workers became jobless due to the total destruction of industrial facilities all around the country. Two million citizens have no means for living and cannot ensure the minimum for existence.

Overall material damage is enormous. Preliminary estimates indicate that barbaric air strikes of the neo-fascist NATO alliance, since the beginning of the unprovoked aggression on the SR of Yugoslavia,on industrial, commercial and civil facilities and structures throughout our peace-loving country, have incurred damages in excess of 10 billion dollars. In the territory of the northern province of Vojvodine alone, damages have been estimated in excess of 3,5 billion dollars.

TRAFFIC
The road and railway networks, especially road and rail bridges,
most of which were destroyed or damaged beyond repair, suffered
extensive destruction. The targets of attacks were such
communications as:

1. BRIDGES (11 DESTROYED AND 13 DAMAGED):
1.The Varadin Bridge over the Danube was destroyed (on 1 April
1999);
2.The "Sloboda" (Freedom) Bridge over the Danube was destroyed (on 4 April 1999);
3.The "Mladosti" (Youth) Bridge over the Danube, connecting Backa
Palanka with Ilok, was damaged (on 4 April 1999);
4.The new railway bridge over the Danube connecting Bogojevo and
Erdut was damaged (on 5 April 1999);
5.The road bridge over the Danube, connecting Bogojevo with Erdut
was damaged (on 5 April 1999);
6.The bridge over the Danube along the Beograd-Novi Sad road, near
Beska, Indjija municipality, was damaged (on 1 April 1999);
7.The road bridge along the Magura Belacevac road, 15 kilometres
from Pristina, suffered extensive damage;
8.The "Zezeljov" Bridge in Novi Sad was damaged (on 5 April 1999);
9.The bridge over the Ibar river, Biljanovac municipality, was
damaged (on 5 - 13 April 1999);
10.The bridge over the Vrbacka river near Jezgrovic was destroyed
(on 5 April 1999);
11.The "Lozno" railway bridge near Usce was destroyed (on 5 April
1999);
12.The road bridge on the road leading to Brvenik, near Usce, was
destroyed (on 5 April 1999);
13.The bridge along the Nis-Pristina primary road, near Kursumlija,suffered extensive damage (on 5 April 1999);
14.The bridge near Zubin Potok was destroyed (on 5 April 1999);
15.The Grdelica gorge railway bridge was damaged (on 12 April 1999);
16.The road bridge over the Kosanica river near Kursumlija was
damaged (on 13 April 1999);
17.The old bridge on the river Rasina in the town of Krusevac (12-13 April 1999);
18.The Krusevac-Pojate bridge on the river Zapadna Morava, at the
village of Jasika, was destroyed (on 13 April 1999);
19.The railway bridge on the river Lim, between Priboj and
Prijepolje, near hydroelectric power station Bistrica was destroyed(on 15 April 1999);
20.The road bridge on the river Toplica, on the Nis-Pristina road
near the town of Kursumlija, was heavily damaged (14 and 19 April
1999);
21.The bridge on the river Ibar, at the village of Biljanovac near
Raska, sustained heavy damages (15.04.1999.);
22.The bridge between Smederevo and Kovin has been destroyed (16
April 1999);
23.The railway bridge on the river Kostajnica, near Kursumlija, has sustained heavy damages and is out of service (18.04.1999.);
24.The bridge on the river Kosanica, at the village of Selo Visoko,has sustained heavy damages and is out of service (18.04.1999.);

2. RAILWAYS RAILWAY STATIONS (12):

1.The Kraljevo - Kosovo Polje rail, near Ibarska Slatina;
2.The Belgrade - Bar rail, due to the destruction of the railway
track near the village of Strbce and destruction of the bridge on
the river Lim, between Priboj and Prijepolje;
3.The Kursumlija - Prokuplje rail, near Pepeljevac village;
4.The Kraljevo - Kosovo Polje rail, near Ibarska Slatina;
5.The Nis - Pristina rail, near Kursumlija;
6."Sarpelj" tunnel, near Jerinje village, 15 km north of Leposavic
towards Raska, was destroyed;
7.Railway station in Kraljevo (Bogutovac);
8.Railway station in Kosovo Polje;
9.The Belgrade - Thessaloniki rail, due to the destruction of the
bridge in the Grdelica gorge;
10.Railway station in the town of Biljanovac;
11.Railway track and overpass (Josinacka Banja) near the town of
Biljanovac;
12.Railway track Kursumlija - Podujevo, due to damages on the
railway bridge at Kursumlija;

3. ROADS AND TRANSPORTERS (6 MAJOR ROADS):
1.Ibarska primary road, due to damages to the bridge on the Ibar
river, Biljanovac municipality, and destruction of the road between Pozega and Cacak;
2.Belgrade-Zagreb highway, near Stari Banovci;
3.Traffic suspended on the Kosovska Mitrovica-Ribarici section of
the Adriatic highway due to the destruction of the bridge over the
Vrbacka river;
4."Jedinstvo" bus station in Vranje sustained extensive damage;
5."Kosmet Prevoz" transporter in Gnjilane (a hangar full of new
buses);
6.Kraljevo-Raska primary road;
7.Bus station in Pristina;
8.Traffic has been suspended on the Krusevac-Pojate road due to the destruction of the bridge on the Zapadna Morava, in the village of Jasika;
9.Traffic has been suspended on the Nis-Pristina road, due to the
fact that the bridge on the river Toplica, near the town of
Kursumlija, has sustained heavy damage;

4. AIRPORTS (7):
"Slatina" in Pristina; "Batajnica" and "Surcin" in Belgrade; Nis
airport; "Ponikve" in Uzice; "Golubovac" in Podgorica, "Ladjevci"
airport near Kraljevo; agricultural and sports airfield in Sombor.

ECONOMIC AND CIVILIAN TARGETS, PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
The air strikes have so far destroyed or damaged all over the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia several thousand economic facilities and dwellings. In the Leskovac region alone, over 3,500 industrial facilities and dwellings were either destroyed or damaged.

The devastation of NATO forces was particularly manifest in
Pristina, Novi Sad, Aleksinac, Djakovica, Prokuplje, Gracanica,
Cuprija, etc. Housing blocks on the outskirts of Belgrade - Kijevo
Knecevac, Batajnica, Jakovo, Borca, as well as the area around
Pancevo, were under attack.

1. INDUSTRY AND TRADE:
The NATO aggressor's attacks targeted the factories and industrial
facilities which directly cater for the needs of the population,
among which are:

1."Lola Utva" agricultural aircraft factory in Pancevo;
2."Galenika" drug factory in Belgrade;
3."Zdravlje" pharmaceutical plant in Leskovac;
4."Sloboda" white goods factory in Cacak;
5."Din" tobacco industry in Nis;
6."Elektronska industrija" factory in Nis;
7."Div" cigarette factory in Vranje;
8.Tubes factory in Urosevac;
9."Jastrebac" machine industry in Nis;
10."Milan Blagojevic" chemical plant in Lucani;
11.Plastics factory in Pristina;
12."Binacka Morava" hydro construction company in Gnjilane;
13."Nova Jugoslavija" printers in Vranje;
14.Facilities of the "Beograd" rail company in Nis;
15.Over 250 commercial and crafts shops in Djakovica were destroyed;
16."Dijana" shoe factory in Sremska Mitrovica;
17."Zastava" car factory in Kragujevac;
18."14 Oktobar" machine factory in Krusevac;
19.Cotton yarn factory in PriStina;
20."Krusik" holding corporation in Valjevo;
21."Ciklonizacija" in Novi Sad;
22."Tehnogas" in Novi Sad;
23."Novograp" in Novi Sad;
24."Gumins" in Novi Sad;
25."Albus" in Novi Sad;
26."Petar Drapsin" in Novi Sad;
27."Motins" in Novi Sad;
28."Izolacija" in Novi Sad;
29."Novokabel" in Novi Sad;
30."Istra" fittings factory in Kula;
31.The port of Bogojevo;
32.Industrial complex "Dvadeset Prvi Maj" in Rakovica;
33.Machine building plant "Industrija Motora Rakovica" in Rakovica;
34.Factory "Jugostroj" in Pancevo;
35.Factory "Frigostroj" in Pancevo;
36.Surface coal mine "Belacevac";

2. REFINERIES AND WAREHOUSES
Refineries and warehouses storing liquid raw materials and chemicals intended for the oil and chemical industry, were hit in Pancevo, Novi Sad, Sombor and elsewhere, causing large contamination of soil and the air:

1.Fuel storage in Lipovica, which caused a great fire in the
Lipovica forest (on 26 March 1999);
2.Oil Refinery in Pancevo - totally demolished (4-16 April 1999);
3."Jugopetrol" installations in Smederevo (on 4-13 April 1999);
4."Jugopetrol" storage in Sombor (on 7 April 1999);
5."Beopetrol" storages in Belgrade and Bogutovac (on 4 April 1999);
6."Beopetrol" fuel storage in Pristina (on 7 April 1999);
7.Fuel storage of the boiler plant in Novi Beograd (on 4 April
1999);
8.Thermo electric power station/boiler plant in Novi Sad (on 5 April1999);
9.Oil Refinery in Novi Sad, storage of bitumen (5 and 6 April 1999);
10.Fuel storage "Naftagas promet" which is located 10 km from Sombor(5 April 1999);
11.Naftagas warehouse between Conoplje and Kljaicevo (Sombor);
12.Jugopetrol warehouse in Pristina (on 12 April 1999);
13.Jugopetrol petrol station in Pristina ( on 13 April 1999);
14.Petrochemical industry "DP HIP PETROHEMIJA" in Pancevo ­ totally demolished (14-15 April 1999);
15.Fertilizer plant "DP HIP AZOTARA" in Pancevo - totally destroyed (14-15 April 1999);
16.Chemical plant "Prva Iskra" in Baric - destruction of the
production line (19 April 1999);


3. AGRICULTURE:
1.PIK "Kopaonik" in Kursumlija;
2.PIK "Mladost" in Gnjilane;
3.Agricultural Complex "Malizgan" in Dolac;
4.Agricultural Complex "Djuro Strugar" in Kula;
5.In forest fires caused by NATO cruise missiles and bombs over 250 hectares of forests have been burned down;
6.Several thousand hectares of fertile land, many rivers, lakes and underground waters have been polluted due to the spillage of petrochemical substances, oil spills and slicks;

4. HOSPITALS AND HEALTH CARE CENTRES (16):
NATO aviation also targeted many hospitals and health-care
institutions, which have been partially damaged or totally
destroyed, including:

Hospital and Medical Centre in the territory in Leskovac;
Hospital and Poly-clinic in Nis;
Gerontological Centre in Leskovac;
General Hospital in Djakovica;
City Hospital in Novi Sad;
Gynaecological Hospital and Maternity Ward of the Clinical Centre in Belgrade;
Neuropsychiatric Ward "Dr. Laza Lazarevic" and Central Pharmacy of
the Emergency Centre in Belgrade;
Army Medical Academy in Belgrade;
Medical Centre and Ambulance Centre in Aleksinac;
"Sveti Sava" hospital in Belgrade;
Medical Centre in Kraljevo;
Dispensary on Mount Zlatibor;
Health Care Centre in Rakovica;

5. SCHOOLS (MORE THAN 190 FACILITIES)
Over 190 schools, faculties and facilities for students and children were damaged or destroyed (over 20 faculties, 6 collages, 40 secondary and 80 elementary schools, 6 student dormitories), including:

Elementary schools "16. oktobar" and "Vladimir Rolovic" in Belgrade;
Day-care centre in settlement Petlovo Brdo in Belgrade;
Two secondary schools in the territory of Nis;
Elementary schools "Toza Markovic", "Djordje Natosevic", "Veljko
Vlahovic", "Sangaj" and "Djuro Danicic" and a day-care centre "Duga" in Novi Sad and creches in Visarionova Street and in the
neighbourhood of Sangaj; Traffic School Centre, Faculty of
Philosophy;
Four elementary schools and a Medical high school in the territory
of Leskovac;
Elementary school in Lucane, as well as a larger number of educationfacilities in the territory of Kosovo and Metohija;
Faculties of Law and Economics and elementary school "Radoje
Domanovic" in Nis;
Elementary schools in Kraljevo and the villages of Cvetka, Aketa and Ladjevci;
In Sombor: elementary schools "Ivo Lola Ribar", "A. Mrazovic", "N.
Vukicevic" and "Nikola Tesla" in Kljajicevo;
School centre in Kula;
Elementary school and Engineering secondary school centre in
Rakovica;

6. PUBLIC AND HOUSING FACILITIES (TENS OF THOUSANDS)
Severe damage to the facilities of the Republican and Federal
Ministry of the Interior in Belgrade (3 April 1999),
Damage to the building of the Institute for Security of the Ministry of the Interior in Banjica (3 April 1999);
Severe damage to the TV RTS studio in Pristina;
Heavy damage to Hydro-Meteorological Station (Bukulja, near
Arandjelovac);
Post Office in Pristina destroyed (7 April 1999);
Refugee centre in Pristina destroyed (7 April 1999);
"Tornik" ski resort on Mount Zlatibor (on 8 April 1999);
"Divcibare" mountain resort (on 11 April 1999);
"Baciste" Hotel on Mount Kopaonik (on 12 April 1999);
City power plant in the town of Krusevac (12-13 April 1999);
Meteorological Station on Mount Kopaonik damaged (on 13 April 1999);
Four libraries in Rakovica sustained heavy damage: "Radoje Dakic",
"Isidora Sekulic", "Milos Crnjanski" and "Dusan Matic";
Refugee camp "7 juli" in Paracin has sustained heavy damage;
Office building of the Provincial Executive Council of Vojvodina,
Novi Sad;
Several thousand housing facilities damaged or destroyed, privatelyor State owned, across Yugoslavia - most striking examples being housing blocks in downtown Aleksinac and those near Post Office in Pristina.

7. INFRASTRUCTURE:
Electrical Power Supply in Batajnica (26 March 1999);
Damage to water supply system in Zemun (5 April 1999);
Damage to a power station in Bogutovac (10 April 1999);
Telephone lines cut off in Bogutovac (10 April 1999);
Damage to a power station in Pristina (12 April 1999);
Damage to Bistrica hydroelectric power station in Polinje (13 April 1999);

TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TV TRANSMITTERS (17):

1.Jastrebac (Prokuplje)
2.Gucevo (Loznica)
3.Cot (Fruska Gora)
4.Grmija (Pristina)
5.Bogutovac (Pristina)
6.TV transmitter on Mt Goles (Pristina)
7.Mokra Gora (Pristina)
8.Kutlovac (Stari Trg)
9."Cigota" (Uzice)
10."Tornik" (Uzice)
11.Transmitter on Crni Vrh (Jagodina)
12.Satellite station (in Prilike near Ivanjica)
13.TV masts and transmitters (Novi Sad)
14.TV transmitter on Mt Ovcara (Cacak)
15.TV transmitter in Kijevo (Belgrade)
16.TV transmitter on Mt Cer
17.Communications relay on Mt Jagodnji (Krupanj)

CULTURAL-HISTORICAL MONUMENTS AND RELIGIOUS SHRINES
MEDIEVAL MONASTERIES AND RELIGIOUS SHRINES (16):

1.Monastery Gracanica from 14th century (24 March - 6 April 1999);
2.Monastery Rakovica from 17th century (29 March 1999);
3.Patriarchate of Pec (1 April 1999);
4.Church in Jelasnica near Surdulica (4 April 1999);
5.Monastery of the Church of St. Juraj (built in 1714) in
Petrovaradin (1 April 1999);
6.Monastery of Holy Mother (12th century) at the estuary of the Kosanica in the Toplica - territory of municipality of Kursumlija (4 April 1999);
7.Monastery of St. Nicholas (12th century) in the territory of the
municipality of Kursumlija (4 April 1999);
8.Monastery of St. Archangel Gabriel in Zemun (5 April 1999);
9.Roman Catholic Church St. Antonio in Djakovica (29 March 1999);
10.Orthodox cemetery in Gnjilane (30 March 1999);
11.Monuments destroyed in Bogutovac (8 April 1999);
12."Kadinjaca" memorial complex (8 April 1999);
13.Vojlovica monastery near Pancevo (12 April 1999);
14.Hopovo monastery, iconostasis damaged (12 April 1999);
15.Orthodox Christian cemetery in Pristina (12 April 1999);
16.Monastery church St, Archangel Michael in Rakovica (16 April
1999);

CULTURAL-HISTORICAL MONUMENTS AND MUSEUMS (8):
1.Severe damage to the roof structure of the Fortress of
Petrovaradin (1 April 1999);
2.Heavy damage to "Tabacki bridge", four centuries old, in Djakovica(5 April 1999);
3.Substantial damage to the building in Stara Carsija (Old street)
in Djakovica (5 April 1999);
4.Destroyed archives housed in one of the Government buildings in
Belgrade (3 April 1999);
5.Memorial complex in Gucevo (Loznica);
6.Memorial complex "Sumarice" in Kragujevac;
7.Vojvodina Museum in Novi Sad;
8.Old Military Barracks in Kragujevac - under the protection of the state (16 April 1999);

Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of FR Yugoslavia





49 posted on 01/04/2003 5:16:35 PM PST by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Matthew James
See the reply #43 bio on Gen. W. Clark.
50 posted on 01/04/2003 5:43:34 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson