Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL: Giants would have been flagged if they spiked it
AP Via ESPN ^ | 1-6-03 | ANON

Posted on 01/06/2003 11:48:10 AM PST by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321 next last
To: mr.pink
I can never remember who's always eligible and who has to declare, I know the center and inside linemen are never eligible and everybody else can be depending. Don't forget Amos Zeroue. Without injuries the Steelers actually start games with 6 QBs of varying levels of experience, why Cowher doesn't fear the injury bug as much as other coaches.
101 posted on 01/06/2003 12:34:26 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
How do you know which side of the field is for the Raiders? Easy! It's the one with hadicapped seating on the bench.

Bookmarking your assessment for future evaluation & comment...

102 posted on 01/06/2003 12:34:34 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
WFAN (a sports radio station in the New York City area) has just announced that the NFL has told the New York Giants that the game cannot end on off-setting penalties and the Giants should have got another down.
103 posted on 01/06/2003 12:34:42 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Bad clock management is the least of his troubles. His teams are consistently outplayed in the second half of games, which means the opposing coach is always out-performing him when it comes to making adjustments.

Also, his teams demonstrate some of the worst football fundamentals (missed blocks, poor tackling, mental mistakes, etc.) I've ever seen. Even when the Giants were up 38-14 I was rattling off a list of players and individual plays in that game that even a marginal high school coach would never tolerate.

104 posted on 01/06/2003 12:34:54 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: discostu
I've heard Bret do them in the past. Can't recall ESPN getting any playoff telecasts.
In fact, I can recall Bret doing a playoff game with Philly and Dick Vermeil was his co-host. That was at least in the early 90's (i.e. pre-Rams).
I also heard Mike Patrick state this earlier this year. You may have seen them do a playoff game, but I can't recall one.
Doesn't mean you're not right.
Of course, I try to zone out most of these dudes and, if Philly's playing, put on Merrill Reese, the greatest voice in football.
With Merrill, you have to add one to the team's possession and subtract one from wherever he says the Eagles got to...
106 posted on 01/06/2003 12:35:28 PM PST by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
He dropped the pass because at the start of the play, he was needed by the president to consult on matters of super-human rescue. He had a cell phone in one hand speaking with the president, a steroid injection in his other, and a small cheerleader(over 18) camped out in his pants offering super-human gratification. As a result of the embarassing drop, he has instructed the president to have his people talk to my people while the ball is in the air. The cheerleader has been advised to wear a mouthguard next time or her sister will be called up for the next game. Those teeth can be distracting even to a super-human like Shockey.

The war on Iraq has not taken place yet because Shockey needs to finish one thing at a time.

107 posted on 01/06/2003 12:35:35 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: amused
I agree. Which is why this was the first year since 1979 that I didn't attend a single Giants home game. The NFL bores me to tears.

108 posted on 01/06/2003 12:36:29 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Fassel is a complete idiot.

I mean, how could he ever expect that there might be a bad snap? It hasn't even happened for a week or two. And his new snapper, picked up during the week of the game, probably practiced snapping with the holder on his new team a few times. How could he ever be blamed for not having some plan about what to do in the event of a bad snap on a third down field goal try?

Right!

It's Fassel's job to know what the rules are and to alert the players to what he wants them to do. He even had a courtesy time-out given to him by the 49ers (to "freeze" the kicker - how stupid!) to go over it one more time. If spiking isn't allowed it hardly matters, a quick incompleted pass to an end, or into the knees of some defensive lineman if necessary, would have given the Giants a second chance without any penalty at all.

Announcers can be ignorant of such things. For an NFL head coach to be, is inexcusable.

ML/NJ

109 posted on 01/06/2003 12:36:52 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
The worst part is that Stewart is a fantastic wide receiver and pretty solid runningback. The thing he's worst at is the thing he wants to do. I'd kill to have him added to the receiving group, we'd have an even more explosive offense if he was on the field regularly... just not under center.
110 posted on 01/06/2003 12:37:11 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
?!?! How in the world could you include Costas with Dierdork or Dennis Miller?
111 posted on 01/06/2003 12:37:51 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: skull stomper
Jack Buck knew that even on radio, there's a time to shut up, and nobody knows more about the pro game than Stram.
112 posted on 01/06/2003 12:38:11 PM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I beleive there were no off-setting penalties on that play. I thought the flag for pass interference is picked up when the receiver being interfered with is ineligible.
113 posted on 01/06/2003 12:39:07 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Steelers vs. Bears, Steelers' ball on the Bears' 43, Bears up 24-20. Kordell Stewart, in relief of Tommy Maddox, takes the snap under center, and hands it off to Bettis, who hands it off to Randle-El in a reverse. Randle-El then fires a forward pass to Stewart, who catches it, and takes it to the end zone as time runs out in the 4th quarter.
As much as I'd hate to say it, it looks as if the Bears have lost this one in a heartbreaker. Am I right?

Nope, for the quarterback to be an eligible receiver he cannot take the snap under center; he must be in the shotgun. Illegal forward pass.

114 posted on 01/06/2003 12:39:34 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
While the "tuck call" sucked, the Raiders should have never been in a position for that call to matter. They got the lead and started relaxing. They let the Pats back in the game and paid the price teams pay for doing that.
115 posted on 01/06/2003 12:39:50 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Yeah, it's good to know (for the record) that the spotter knew what he was doing when he tried to pass the ball downfield. Chris Collingsworth should have a red face today, he made such a big thing about it yesterday.
116 posted on 01/06/2003 12:40:06 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
...he guy's name was Tom Waddle.

Tom Waddle was great to watch....classy and tough.

I made a mistake, LLoyd and Nickerson were not drafted 6-a and 6-b the same year. LLoyd was a fifth rounder the year before Nick was drafted.
117 posted on 01/06/2003 12:40:11 PM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
I have a t-shirt that shows my membership as an "Official Raider Hater". I picked it up at a Monday night game at Mile High several years back-Broncos 31-3 over the Raiders. Jeff George was sacked something like 5 times. It was great. (Although you probably didn't enjoy that one as much as I did.)
118 posted on 01/06/2003 12:40:17 PM PST by ThinkingMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I wondered about that when it happened. I knew about the defensive penelty rule, and an offsetting penelty does involve a defensive penelty, offset or not. Interesting.
119 posted on 01/06/2003 12:40:38 PM PST by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
You mean Collinsworth got it wrong? I'm shocked...Shocked!
120 posted on 01/06/2003 12:41:21 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson