Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2003 6:33:58 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: RCW2001
She wrote that the girl never clearly said stop, instead saying "I should be going now" and "I need to go home."

What a stupid statement. I suppose he wouldn't have understood "Get away from me, you jerk" either.

2 posted on 01/06/2003 6:44:49 PM PST by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Two teens are having sex. In the midst of this, the girl says "I should be going now" and "I need to go home." 90 seconds elapse before he stops. The boy is guilty of rape according to these ultra-liberal judges.

Is it me or does this utterly defy logic, biology, and justice? Is not this boy completely innocent?

3 posted on 01/06/2003 6:45:07 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
The 2000 case involved two 17-year-olds who had sex in a bedroom during a party. The boy testified that the sex was consensual and that he stopped when the girl demanded. She testified the boy kept having sex with her for about a "minute and a half" after she called it off. The boy was convicted of rape and served about six months in a juvenile facility.

Serves him right.

4 posted on 01/06/2003 6:47:22 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
"Romance, finis. Your chance, finis.
Those ants that invaded my pants, finis.
Bewitched, bothered and bewildered - no more.

6 posted on 01/06/2003 6:48:03 PM PST by Six Bells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Let's see....

17 year old girl say "Okie Dokie" to sex.

At some point during intercourse she says "Well, I guess I should go home" or "I should be leaving."

He countinues for "about a minute or a minute and a half" (according to her testimony.

The guy ( no age given) is CONVICTED OF RAPE~!

What a bunch of crap.

7 posted on 01/06/2003 6:48:12 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
This is farcical. But when Clinton violently raped Juanita Broaddrick, that was OK?

Rape is a very serious crime. When you start confusing it with other, lesser offenses the end result will be lower sentences for all kinds of rape, including the real thing.
8 posted on 01/06/2003 6:48:57 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Not to minimize the crime of rape, but wasn't there a song back in the early 90s named (and sung by a woman)"When I say no, I mean maybe"?
11 posted on 01/06/2003 6:51:12 PM PST by Ipse Dixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Last year I testified at a rape trial in Virginia. The defendant [male] was an 18 year old boy. The complainant was an 18 year old girl. After drinking rather more than they BOTH should have, an act of intercourse took place. This was confirmed the next day by medical testing. The girl discovered what had happened the the next morning. [Oh yeah - they were both sharing a sleeping bag.] RAPE she screamed. The police descended and took the boy off to jail. Alas neither of them could remember what had happened. End of case, right? WRONG!! He was indicted and stood trial for rape. The point at issue was weather or not she had suffered an alcoholic 'blackout' or weather or not the alcohol had rendered her unconscious. In a 'blackout' she would have been conscious but unable to remember what had happened. Why did the case proceed? Because, according to the girl, it must have been rape because, 'she was not that sort of girl.' Fortunately in the rebuttal phase of the trial, upon questioning by the commonwealth's attorney, she blurted out, "I don't remember. I don't remember. I must have blacked out." End of testimony, End of trial. Time for all to go home. At the time he was a virgin, she wasn't. Of course she wasn't 'that sort of girl. And they were both underage vis a vis the consumption of alcohol. That'll teach him!!!!!
12 posted on 01/06/2003 6:51:45 PM PST by drjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Paradise By The Dashboard Lights

Boy:
I remember every little thing
As if it happened only yesterday
Parking by the lake
And there was not another car in sight
And I never had a girl
Looking any better than you did
And all the kids at school
They were wishing they were me that night

And now our bodies are oh so close and tight
It never felt so good, it never felt so right
And we're glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife
C'mon! Hold on tight!
C'mon! Hold on tight!

Though it's cold and lonely in the deep dark night
I can see paradise by the dashboard light

Girl:
Ain't no doubt about it
We were doubly blessed
Cause we were barely seventeen
And we were barely dressed

Ain't no doubt about it
Baby got to go and shout it
Ain't no doubt about it
We were doubly blessed

Boy:
Cause we were barely seventeen
And we were barely dressed

Baby doncha hear my heart
You got it drowning out the radio
I've been waiting so long
For you to come along and have some fun

And I gotta let ya know
No you're never gonna regret it
So open up your eyes I got a big surprise
It'll feel all right
Well I wanna make your motor run

And now our bodies are oh so close and tight
It never felt so good, it never felt so right
And we're glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife
C'mon! Hold on tight!
C'mon! Hold on tight!

Though it's cold and lonley in the deep dark night
I can see paradise by the dashboard light
Paradise by the dashboard light

You got to do what you can
And let Mother Nature do the rest
Ain't no doubt about it
We were doubly blessed
Cause we were barely seventeen
And we were barely--

We're gonna go all the way tonight
We're gonna go allt he way
An tonight's the night...

Radio Broadcast:
Ok, here we go, we got a real pressure cooker
going here, two down, nobody on, no score,
bottom of the ninth, there's the wind-up and
there it is, a line shot up the middle, look
at him go. This boy can really fly!
He's rounding first and really turning it on
now, he's not letting up at all, he's gonna
try for second; the ball is bobbled out in center,
and here comes the throw, and what a throw!
He's gonna slide in head first, here he comes, he's out!
No, wait, safe--safe at second base, this kid really
makes things happen out there.
Batter steps up to the plate, here's the pitch--
he's going, and what a jump he's got, he's trying
for third, here's the throw, it's in the dirt--
safe at third! Holy cow, stolen base!
He's taking a pretty big lead out there, almost
daring him to try and pick him off. The pitcher
glance over, winds up, and it's bunted, bunted
down the third base line, the suicide squeeze in on!
Here he comes, squeeze play, it's gonna be close,
here's the throw, there's the play at the plate,
holy cow, I think he's gonna make it!

II. Let Me Sleep On It

Girl:
Stop right there!
I gotta know right now!
Before we go any further--!

Do you love me?
Will you love me forever?
Do you need me?
Will you never leave me?
Will you make me so happy for the rest of my life?
Will you take me away and will you make me your wife?
Do you love me!?
Will you love me forever!?
Do you need me!?
Will you never leave me!?
Will you make me so happy for the rest of my life!?
Will you take me away and will you make me your wife!?
I gotta know right now
Before we go any further
Do you love me!!!?
Will you love me forever!!!?

Boy:
Let me sleep on it
Baby, baby let me sleep on it
Let me sleep on it
And I'll give you my answer in the morning

Let me sleep on it
Baby, baby let me sleep on it
Let me sleep on it
And I'll give you my answer in the morning

Let me sleep on it
Baby, baby let me sleep on it
Let me sleep on it
And I'll give you my answer in the morning

Girl:
I gotta know right now!
Do you love me?
Will you love me forever?
Do you need me?
Will you never leave me?
Will you make me so happy for the rest of my life?
Will you take me away and will you make me your wife?
I gotta know right now!
Before we go any further
Do you love me?
And will you love me forever?

Boy:
Let me sleep on it
Baby, baby let me sleep on it
Let me sleep on it
And I'll give you my answer in the morning
Let me sleep on it!!!

Girl:
Will you love me forever?

Boy:
Let me sleep on it!!!

Girl:
Will you love me forever!!!

III. Praying for the End of Time

Boy:
I couldn't take it any longer
Lord I was crazed
And when the feeling came upon me
Like a tidal wave
I started swearing to my god and on my mother's grave
That I would love you to the end of time
I swore that I would love you to the end of time!

So now I'm praying for the end of time
To hurry up and arrive
Cause if I gotta spend another minute with you
I don't think that I can really survive
I'll never break my promise or forget my vow
But God only knows what I can do right now
I'm praying for the end of time
It's all that I can do
Praying for the end of time, so I can end my time with you!!!

Boy:
It was long ago and it was far away
and it was so much better than it is today

Girl:
It never felt so good
It never felt so right
And we were glowing like
A metal on the edge of a knife

14 posted on 01/06/2003 6:53:41 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Let me understand this.

Two consenting people are having sex. While they are actively engaging in sexual intercourse, the girl says stop.

The boy takes his time to stop and that constitutes rape?

Isn't that fact that they ALREADY are engaging in sexual intercourse would mean it can not be rape.

Now I might call it assault if he refused to stop.

15 posted on 01/06/2003 6:53:52 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
She wrote that the girl never clearly said stop, instead saying "I should be going now" and "I need to go home."

Reminds me of the old joke:

What's the sound a woman makes when she's having fun in bed?

I didn't figure you'd know.
16 posted on 01/06/2003 6:54:41 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
So, was HE not a victim of statutory rape?
23 posted on 01/06/2003 6:59:19 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
This was a kid and the sex was consentual, how do we know the kid heard her say stop (if she ever did)?
Did he say she said stop or is this a he-said she-said issue?

If a female gets mad after sex for any reason, it seems too easy for her to go back and claim rape.

How can you charge a crime after the genie got let out of the bottle by consent?

Seems to much gray area in this case.
64 posted on 01/06/2003 8:00:06 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Sorry that's NOT RAPE. Not with the info we have here.

6 months? Geez... I bet the poor BOY feels raped at this point. He'll probably be scarred for life...
84 posted on 01/06/2003 8:20:02 PM PST by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
My own objection and argument is that we as a society have allowed the lawyers and social (and other) scientists to define for us what is good, what is evil, what is wise, what is foolish. We have elevated these professions to the highest priesthood, and that is in my view the ultimate tragedy here.

Another example: your grandmother's sagely advice is now dismissed as "old wives tales", "anecdotal evidence", "urban legend". A year or so ago, I read about one of those governement funded scientific studies that concluded after much sweat an thousands or millions of dollars, that indeed, an apple a day does keep the doctor away (I kid you not!) I am sick of lawyers, halfwitted judges and sociologists, defining for us what's right and wrong. Given a choice, I'll go to a humble parish priest to hear some age old wisdom, thank you.

86 posted on 01/06/2003 8:24:28 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
While I would agree that "no means no" at any point, this seems like nitpicking.

I mean, just logically.. common sense says at that point it would take a few seconds to confirm what was said and to be sure it was understood correctly. Probably the LAST thing you would expect to hear is "STOP"

Electronics have a response time measured in microseconds, not people.. be they male or female.

From the facts presented, it seems unjust.

90 posted on 01/06/2003 8:28:58 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
A hapless young man named Adaire
Was romancing his girl on the stair
At the next to the last stroke
He stopped, though his heart broke,
For the STOP on her lips raised his hair!

* * * * * * * * *

So THIS is the kind of erotic climate in which we will now be expected to conduct our courtships?

I DON'T THINK SO!
110 posted on 01/06/2003 9:18:11 PM PST by Odile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
I have no sympathy for rapists. Zero. None. However, depending upon how it was said, it seems to me "I should be going" could easily be interpreted as "Hurry up and finish, because you're not very good."
113 posted on 01/06/2003 9:30:54 PM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
The little turd got off easy (double entendre intended). I've got a bit of advice for Pecker Boy. In the future, wait till you're married before having sex.
116 posted on 01/06/2003 9:45:43 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001; friendly; Texas Eagle; Born in a Rage; AM2000; San Jacinto; Cicero; per loin; ...
THE FOLLOWING POST IS NOT SUITABLE MATERIAL FOR THE YOUNG OR THE TIMID.

This story is notable, if for nothing else, for the dearth of facts about what actually happened. I looked the case up at www.courtinfo.cal.gov and have posted the "Facts" section from the Supreme Court decision below. The facts are quite different from what the newspaper article claims and may change a few opinions (in both directions).

People v. John Z. (PDF document)

People v. John Z. (WORD document)

FACTS
The following facts are largely taken from the Court of Appeal opinion in this case. During the afternoon of March 23, 2000, 17-year-old Laura T. was working at Safeway when she received a call from Juan G., whom she had met about two weeks earlier. Juan wanted Laura to take him to a party at defendant’s home and then return about 8:30 p.m. to pick him up. Laura agreed to take Juan to the party, but since she planned to attend a church group meeting that evening she told him she would be unable to pick him up.

Sometime after 6:00 p.m., Laura drove Juan to defendant’s residence. Defendant and Justin L. were present. After arranging to have Justin L.’s stepbrother, P. W., buy them alcohol, Laura picked up P. W. and drove him to the store where he bought beer. Laura told Juan she would stay until 8:00 or 8:30 p.m. Although defendant and Juan drank the beer, Laura did not.

During the evening, Laura and Juan went into defendant’s parents’ bedroom. Juan indicated he wanted to have sex but Laura told him she was not ready for that kind of activity. Juan became upset and went into the bathroom. Laura left the bedroom and both defendant and Justin asked her why she "wouldn’t do stuff." Laura told them that she was not ready.

About 8:10 p.m., Laura was ready to leave when defendant asked her to come into his bedroom to talk. She complied. Defendant told her that Juan had said he (Juan) did not care for her; defendant then suggested that Laura become his girlfriend. Juan entered the bedroom and defendant left to take a phone call.

When defendant returned to the bedroom, he and Juan asked Laura if it was her fantasy to have two guys, and Laura said it was not. Juan and defendant began kissing Laura and removing her clothes, although she kept telling them not to. At some point, the boys removed Laura’s pants and underwear and began "fingering" her, "playing with [her] boobs" and continued to kiss her. Laura enjoyed this activity in the beginning, but objected when Juan removed his pants and told defendant to keep fingering her while he put on a condom. Once the condom was in place, defendant left the room and Juan got on top of Laura. She tried to resist and told him she did not want to have intercourse, but he was too strong and forced his penis into her vagina. The rape terminated when, due to Laura’s struggling, the condom fell off. Laura told Juan that "maybe it’s a sign we shouldn’t be doing this," and he said "fine" and left the room. (Although Juan G. was originally a codefendant, at the close of the victim’s testimony he admitted amended charges of sexual battery (§ 243.4) and unlawful sexual intercourse (§ 261.5, subd. (b)), a misdemeanor.)

Laura rolled over on the bed and began trying to find her clothes; however, because the room was dark she was unable to do so. Defendant, who had removed his clothing, then entered the bedroom and walked to where Laura was sitting on the bed and "he like rolled over [her] so [she] was pushed back down to the bed." Laura did not say anything and defendant began kissing her and telling her that she had "a really beautiful body." Defendant got on top of Laura, put his penis into her vagina "and rolled [her] over so [she] was sitting on top of him." Laura testified she "kept . . . pulling up, trying to sit up to get it out . . . [a]nd he grabbed my hips and pushed me back down and then he rolled me back over so I was on my back . . . and . . . kept saying, will you be my girlfriend." Laura "kept like trying to pull away" and told him that "if he really did care about me, he wouldn’t be doing this to me and if he did want a relationship, he should wait and respect that I don’t want to do this." After about 10 minutes, defendant got off Laura, and helped her dress and find her keys. She then drove home.

On cross-examination, Laura testified that when defendant entered the room unclothed, he lay down on the bed behind her and touched her shoulder with just enough pressure to make her move, a nudge. He asked her to lie down and she did. He began kissing her and she kissed him back. He rolled on top of her, inserted his penis in her and, although she resisted, he rolled her back over, pulling her on top of him. She was on top of him for four or five minutes, during which time she tried to get off, but he grabbed her waist and pulled her back down. He rolled her over and continued the sexual intercourse. Laura told him that she needed to go home, but he would not stop. He said, "just give me a minute," and she said, "no, I need to get home." He replied, "give me some time" and she repeated, "no, I have to go home." Defendant did not stop, "[h]e just stayed inside of me and kept like basically forcing it on me." After about a "minute, minute and [a] half," defendant got off Laura.

Defendant testified, admitting that he and Juan were kissing and fondling Laura in the bedroom, but claimed it was with her consent. He also admitted having sexual intercourse with Laura, again claiming it was consensual. He claimed he discontinued the act as soon as Laura told him that she had to go home.

On one hand, there was more than sufficient information for both boys to understand that the issue of consent was in question. On the other hand, any girl that tells you that she was on top of the boy for "four or five minutes" and tried to pull out but was unable to do so, is a 24-karat, gold plated, bald faced, liar. As bad as this recitation of facts is, it still does not offer any testimony by the girl saying that she told either boy "no" or "stop" at any time.

Regards,

Boot Hill

129 posted on 01/07/2003 1:07:59 AM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson