Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First speed of gravity measurement revealed
NewScientist.com ^ | 01/07/2003 | Ed Fomalont and Sergei Kopeikin

Posted on 01/07/2003 6:23:34 PM PST by forsnax5

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-298 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2003 6:23:34 PM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; VadeRetro; ASA Vet; vannrox; blam; Physicist; RadioAstronomer
Ping for Gravity fans!
2 posted on 01/07/2003 6:28:21 PM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
BTTT
3 posted on 01/07/2003 6:29:10 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Hooray! The tag line is Back! (Way To Go, John!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Pretty wild. I always assumed that gravity was an instantaneous thing.
4 posted on 01/07/2003 6:31:30 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Ping for Gravity fans!

Except that if gravity propagated at the speed of light, the earth would long ago have ceased to orbit the sun. The calculation of orbital trajectories, in order to work, have to be plotted treating the speed of gravity as virtually instantaneous.
5 posted on 01/07/2003 6:33:06 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
"But how can you measure the speed of gravity? One way would be to detect gravitational waves, little ripples in space-time that propagate out from accelerating masses. But no one has yet managed to do this.

Measuring the speed of gravity Kopeikin found another way. He reworked the equations of general relativity to express the gravitational field of a moving body in terms of its mass, velocity and the speed of gravity. If you could measure the gravitational field of Jupiter, while knowing its mass and velocity, you could work out the speed of gravity. The opportunity to do this arose in September 2002, when Jupiter passed in front of a quasar that emits bright radio waves. Fomalont and Kopeikin combined observations from a series of radio telescopes across the Earth to measure the apparent change in the quasar's position as the gravitational field of Jupiter bent the passing radio waves."

Then again, perhaps all that they really measured was the speed of the radio waves bending around Jupiter...

6 posted on 01/07/2003 6:34:46 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
It's amazing that Einstein's theories, unprovable when he was alive, are still being shown to be right.

I remember in 1995 when they discovered that Einstein-Bose Condensate was just like Einstein (and Bose) predicted it would be in 1925.

7 posted on 01/07/2003 6:35:05 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I always assumed that gravity was an instantaneous thing.

You're in good company. So did Isaac Newton...

8 posted on 01/07/2003 6:36:31 PM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Gravity particles bump.
9 posted on 01/07/2003 6:39:52 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Fascinating stuff.
10 posted on 01/07/2003 6:40:06 PM PST by conservativemusician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Geeze, we all knew that. It HAS to.

*burp*
11 posted on 01/07/2003 6:40:10 PM PST by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
What Gravitas!
12 posted on 01/07/2003 6:41:34 PM PST by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5

Of course you realize this ping is entirely redundant..

13 posted on 01/07/2003 6:42:39 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
You're in good company. So did Isaac Newton...

I would think that measurements of earth's acceleration toward the sun that show a direction that is 8.3 minutes ahead of the apparent position of the sun in the sky also demonstrate a propagation speed that is virtually (at these distances) instantaneous. That is, the earth is not accelerating toward where "gravity waves" are supposedly reaching the earth together with the photons that left the sun 8.3 minutes previously but toward where the sun actually is.
14 posted on 01/07/2003 6:45:59 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Pretty wild. I always assumed that gravity was an instantaneous thing.

What, then, would prevent the use of gravitational waves as a faster-than-light communications medium?

15 posted on 01/07/2003 6:47:53 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: *RealScience; Ernest_at_the_Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
16 posted on 01/07/2003 6:49:17 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
[thoughts]: (1) Do photons interact gravitationally with each other? (2) Do gravity waves have mass?
17 posted on 01/07/2003 6:51:02 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Perhaps there is a minimum distance -- a quantum of space -- and a minimum amount of time -- a quantum of time. There is a speed limit on light because it cannot take less than one quantum of time to travel across one quantum of space. Do I know what I'm talking about here? Absolutely not. But I don't think anyboody else does, either.
18 posted on 01/07/2003 6:52:46 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
You got it nonetheless. The "Planck" distance and the "Planck" time. Values very small in each case. Everything is grainy when you get small enough.
19 posted on 01/07/2003 6:55:46 PM PST by VadeRetro (Indian name: "Argues with Nutcases")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5; SavageRepublican
I love gravity!

Columbia, Missouri (actually Ashland, Missouri)

20 posted on 01/07/2003 6:55:51 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson