Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Denounces U.S. After Talks Offer (N. K. EXTENDS 'MIDDLE FINGER' TO US AFTER WH OVERTURE)
Yahoo News ^ | January 8, 2002 | Yahoo News

Posted on 01/08/2003 7:40:51 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo

[Massive Pro-War, Anti-US Rally in Kim Il Sung Square Yesterday]

Title: North Korea Denounces U.S. After Talks Offer

9:15 a.m. 8 January Eastern Time Reuters to My Yahoo!

By Kim Yeon-hee

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea (news - web sites) accused the United States Wednesday of increasing the danger of war on the Korean peninsula, just hours after Washington changed tack and signaled a willingness to talk about their nuclear standoff.

The reclusive communist state's KCNA news agency made no mention of the U.S. offer, nor of the U.N. watchdog's deadline for it to readmit nuclear inspectors within weeks, but decried Washington's "racket of a nuclear threat."

The U.S administration, which had previously insisted North Korea roll back recent steps to revive its nuclear weapons plans before any talks, announced its new position Tuesday after holding talks in Washington with South Korea (news - web sites) and Japan.

But it insisted that it would not allow North Korea's nuclear program to become a bargaining chip. Pyongyang has threatened war in the event of U.S. economic sanctions over the issue.

"The 'nuclear issue' that renders the situation on the Korean peninsula strained is a product of the U.S. strategy to dominate the world whereby it is working hard to bring a holocaust of a nuclear war to the Korean nation, calling for a pre-emptive nuclear strike after deploying lots of nuclear weapons in and around South Korea," KCNA said. Meanwhile, in further diplomatic efforts to end the crisis, a South Korean presidential envoy, Yim Sung-joon, was due at the White House Wednesday while U.S. Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly, who led Tuesday's talks with South Korean and Japanese officials, was to visit Asia at the end of the week.

"The United States is willing to talk to North Korea about how it will meet its obligations to the international community," the three countries said in a joint statement.

"However, the U.S. delegation stressed that the United States will not provide quid pro quos to North Korea to live up to its existing obligations."

The United States has branded North Korea part of an "axis of evil" along with Iraq and Iran and believes it to be building nuclear weapons but has ruled out a military attack.

North Korea's riposte is that Washington is the world's biggest producer and seller of weapons of mass destruction. South Koreans have been less worried about a perceived North Korean threat than some of their Western allies because they have lived with Pyongyang's bombastic rhetoric for half a century.

SEOUL'S IRAQ FEARS

"What is more serious to us is a war over Iraq because of what it will do to oil prices," said Chung Doo-sun, a fund manager with CJ Investment Trust Management. "War in Iraq is an uncontrollable risk to us. In whatever direction the North Korean issue is developing, we know it will not lead to a war."

North and South Korea are technically still at war because the truce that ended their 1950-53 conflict never led to a peace treaty, but both look forward to eventual reunification of a country which dates back some 5,000 years.

"People do not think that there is going to be a war in the Korean peninsula," a Unification Ministry official told Reuters.

"People want to solve this issue through dialogue or other peaceful tactics, not through military force."

South Korea's benchmark stock index stayed steady in the morning, partly on the U.S. comments on North Korea, but slipped in the afternoon. The South Korean won was slightly lower but North Korea was not a factor, dealers said.

KCNA reported that more than 100,000 residents of the North's capital, Pyongyang, massed Tuesday to show support for Kim Jong-il's leadership on the 55th anniversary of the founding of the DPRK -- the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

A banner in the square, which is named after Kim Il-sung, Kim's late father and the state's founder, summed up sentiment. "Let's make a great victory this year... the 55th anniversary of DPRK establishment on the back of a god-like leader."

SWIPE AT TOKYO

North Korea denounced Japan, meanwhile, for meddling in its business.

"The nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula arose because of the United States and it has nothing to do with Japan," the South's Yonhap news agency quoted Pyongyang Radio as saying.

"Japan has the effrontery to intervene in the nuclear matter and complicate the issue. It is none of their business."

Yonhap said South Korean president-elect Roh Moo-hyun would meet two Japanese delegations next week to discuss the crisis.

The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Tuesday that Pyongyang had "only a matter of weeks" to readmit the IAEA inspectors it expelled last week. Their ejection prompted the new crisis. Earlier, the reclusive North had intensified its rhetoric, demanding Washington open talks and saying any sanctions over its nuclear program would "mean a war, and the war knows no mercy."

President Bush (news - web sites) had hinted at the U.S. change in position Monday, saying "we'll have dialogue," without setting any conditions.

PRECONDITION DROPPED

His aides said later North Korea must first dismantle its nuclear weapon programs, a precondition they acknowledged on Tuesday they had dropped. "This is a step forward from what we have been saying and doing," one senior U.S. official said.

Tensions flared in late December when Pyongyang expelled the inspectors and vowed to fire up a reactor idle since a 1994 pact with Washington that froze its nuclear program in exchange for oil supplies from the West. The U.S. decision marked a partial step in the direction of South Korea, which has argued for dialogue with the North.

In media leaks over the weekend, South Korea dropped hints it wanted the United States to give North Korea security assurances and a promise to resume energy supplies in return for Pyongyang dismantling its nuclear programs.

Washington is seeking to play down the threat from North Korea, which some analysts believe may already possess one or two nuclear weapons, as it prepares for possible war with Iraq.

It accuses Baghdad of seeking weapons of mass destruction but believes it has not yet acquired nuclear weapons.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: administration; brinksman; bush; diplomacy; evil; nkorea; nointenttoinvade; nukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
My, how many times do we have to learn the hard way about Communism, negotiating, tactics in an Asian context, and showing signs of weakness or going overboard on the overstated "we will not invade" nonsense?

Thank you Colin Powell, as well as the minions of career State Department personnel, in power no matter if either a Democratic or Republican Administration.

Time for the State Department to step back, and for D.O.D. to drive the issue for the Administration.

1 posted on 01/08/2003 7:40:51 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Poohbah; Miss Marple; Illbay; section9; Dog; JohnHuang2; Luis Gonzalez; Howlin; MadIvan; ...
Sheesh, Kim Jong-Il must REALLY want that can of whoop-ass.

Wait your turn, pal. We got business with Saddam first.
3 posted on 01/08/2003 7:43:55 AM PST by hchutch (Mr. President, CALL HOWARD STERN!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Appeasement never works. If Colon Bowell and Foggy Bottom haven't learned the lesson by now they never will. A display of force, not piddling diplomacy is what will convince North Korea's power mad dictator to stand down before war becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
4 posted on 01/08/2003 7:45:43 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Gee. They give us the finger, put together a huge army, build nukes, and tell us they are gonna use them on us. I wish I could figure out what they are trying to communicate.
5 posted on 01/08/2003 7:45:46 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
>My, how many times do we have to learn the hard way about Communism, negotiating, tactics in an Asian context,

What is different about negotiation tactics in an Asian context?

6 posted on 01/08/2003 7:47:28 AM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
well we tried....tee hee
7 posted on 01/08/2003 7:48:10 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
well we tried....tee hee
8 posted on 01/08/2003 7:48:13 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
They may sound a different tune after we beat the snot out of Iraq and then help Iran to a "regime change".
What we do in Iraq will be so quick and so violent that even thick-headed lunatics like Kim Jong Il will gasp and break a sweat.
God Bless the American military and our Brittish and Aussie allies - once again we save the world from itself.
Let's Roll !!
9 posted on 01/08/2003 7:48:30 AM PST by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Please, let's stick to original titles. Thank you.
10 posted on 01/08/2003 7:50:04 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
"...Thank you Colin Powell, as well as the minions of career State Department personnel, in power no matter if either a Democratic or Republican Administration..."

Bingo.

Give that walking proof of the 'Peter Principle' a gold watch and get him the Hell out of this administration.

How many young American fighting men will have to die... Soon... Because of this in-over-his-head buffoon's verbal diarrhea?

Send Powell home before his sophomoric miscalculations result in something horrific.

11 posted on 01/08/2003 7:50:09 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
The Best argument I've heard recently, is to let Japan have the Bomb.

Our China Policy, and Our North Korea Policy, would be greatly effectuated, by giving them the same headache.

Hell, as long as China and North Korea want to play atomic footsie, maybe we should consider making Taiwan a member of the Nuclear Club.

12 posted on 01/08/2003 7:54:11 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Eat grass, Kim baby!

You can eat lead later.
13 posted on 01/08/2003 7:54:20 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
How 'bout Cambodia, Haiti, Kosovo, and the Central African Republic. I'm sure each of them could enhance their stature by buying a nuke or two.
14 posted on 01/08/2003 7:59:04 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
.S. and North Korea: Sleeping With the Enemy

You probably know that it has long been U.S. policy to abet the genocidal communist dictatorship of North Korea. You probably didn't know just how much you and other taxpayers are helping a regime that maniacally hates America and starves its own people to build its military.

Bill Clinton's scheme to pacify Pyongyang was idiotic to start with and looks worse with each passing day. Since 1994, the United States has given North Korea:


$591 million in food aid.

$900 million in oil aid, even though we rely on petroleum imports.

$6 billion to build nuclear reactors, thanks to Slick Willie and his stooge envoy Jimmy Carter.
Of course, if the U.S. even considers canceling its despised aid, the blame-America-first crowd, foreign and domestic branches, will shriek.

http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/1/6/193224
15 posted on 01/08/2003 8:00:27 AM PST by TLBSHOW (When will America learn no tax dollars for communist rats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; AmericanInTokyo
Eat grass, Kim baby!

You can eat lead later.

And after that Heads on Pikes Mr. Kim.

BTW AIT, I LIKED YOUR AD LIB TITLE.

16 posted on 01/08/2003 8:03:10 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
""People do not think that there is going to be a war in the Korean peninsula," a Unification Ministry official told Reuters."

Good ... then we can immediately withdraw our aircraft and troops from that hellhole.

Three-tour 2nd Infantry Division vet (1980,1988,1994)

17 posted on 01/08/2003 8:05:17 AM PST by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Hell, as long as China and North Korea want to play atomic footsie, maybe we should consider making Taiwan a member of the Nuclear Club.

Taiwan has been an unofficial member for decades. That's a bad part of town they live in.

The opening part of this article is very misleading. What just hours after Washington changed tack and signaled a willingness to talk about their nuclear standoff. means is that the administration came out and said that if Pyongyang wanted to discuss how they could get back in line with their international agreements, we would help, but there would be no talk of concessions at all.

That's hardly a 'new' policy.

18 posted on 01/08/2003 8:09:56 AM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
It's pretty obvious at this point that NK is throwing a temper tantrum and demanding attention from the US. Notice how they are saying it's none of Japan's business. LOL, none of their business? No, because they want to force the US to talk to them and the Chinese are using the NK's to try to sway the US off the Iraq path. Looks like the Bush administration is not falling for it.

The key to this is the lack of panic on the part of the South Koreans.

19 posted on 01/08/2003 8:13:08 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson