[dirtboy]

Chill out. Dan said "if", and it's his opinion that the dog was threatening. I disagree - and the video is hardly conclusive. Best to let the investigators sort this one out.

[Gargantua]

No, you chill out. From Dan's post # 140:

"I'm willing to give them a break. They made a mistake. The family cooperated. Everything was on-line to a quick resolution -- until the dog attacked the human. Too bad. Bad dog!"

Let me repeat that for you, just so you don't goof up again:

Dan said, "until the dog attacked the human."

If you want to play "moderator," get your facts straight first, and then act like a smart guy.
n'Kay? Thanks, Dirt.

[Politicalmom]

Great.

They will sort it out the same way they did when the INNOCENT kid was shot in the face for reaching for his (REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNMENT) seat belt after he was ordered out of the car.