[aristeides]

I've read the book, and virtually all of the evidence comes from a convicted child molester and fraudster. Hardly the most reliable witness.

"Virtually all of the evidence"? Isn't that an exaggeration? Isn't that just one chapter in a book of 300 pages or so? What do you make of the statement by the general who had access to Hitler's police record?

[gd124]

It is an exaggeration, but the whole thing seems to me like revisionist history, similar to those who would deny that the holocaust happened, though obviously with a different political agenda. There was an article in Newsweek (I know, I know, I read it in doctors waiting room) some time ago which pointed out the numerous flaws in the theory.

It is interesting that Hitler being homosexual to the best of my knowledge had never been claimed before by any serious historian. Not even the ridiculous and discredited screed "The Pink Swastika", which claimed that virtually every man and his dog, even if he had 10 children was queer, put Hitler in the homosexual basket.