RADIOFR'S UNSPUN TONITE (1/9 -- 6-8pmP/9-11pmE): "A DAY AT THE RACISTS'"!

Unspun ^

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

(DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG UNDER PENALTY OF LAW)

Thats good im still giggling

[TLBSHOW]

Silly you shirley

[deport]

Penning up the parrot are you?

[Howlin]

I wish.

[Mo1]

If at first you don't succeed .. try try again .. LOL

[TLBSHOW]

The President signs the wet lands bill. Another liberal act!

So now he needs to sign an excutive order ending affirmative action.......

[TLBSHOW]

Sign an executive order ending affirmative action.

[TLBSHOW]

is on live

[TLBSHOW]

bump to ending the rats racist hold on black Americans

[TLBSHOW]

It started with a DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTS Executive Order
...
The actual phrase "affirmative action" was first used in President Lyndon Johnson's 1965

Executive Order 11246

which requires federal contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."
.....

AND IT SHOULD END WITH A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS Executive Order

[KS Flyover]

Screen shots by hole_n_one

[TLBSHOW]

Byrd is a racist KKK lover!

[Mo1]

Sign an executive order ending affirmative action.

Won't happen that way and you know it

[TLBSHOW]

What was the point of winning the election if you’re just going to act and sound like Democrats?


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/819751/posts?page=

[TLBSHOW]

I know he has those Clinton moments so pull a clinton and sign the executive order ending affirmative action.

[nunya bidness]

When does the show start?

[Howlin]

[TLBSHOW]

Topic: George W. Bush
Where does George W. Bush stand on affirmative action?

Campaign For a Colorblind America

The Campaign For a Colorblind America (www.equalrights.com) asked George W. Bush to answer the following questions:

In his answer, to each of these questions, Gov. George W. Bush checked "No Opinion."

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a36e138b1462f.htm

[Mo1]

He is NOT Clinton and YOU KNOW IT!!!

[TLBSHOW]

Will George W. work for
a color-blind America?

Michelle Malkin

Bush's silence sent me sifting through what little scraps of public record exist that might reassure me of his commitment to color-blind government. Yes, his handlers are wonderfully talented at getting the newspapers to run front-page photos of the compassionate Bush hugging inner-city children. Yet, when the Texas-based Campaign for a Color-blind America asked public officials in a survey whether "Congress should enact a law that would ban discrimination and preferences on the basis of race, color, sex, ethnicity and national origin in the operation of public employment and public contracting," Bush answered "No Opinion."

Bush also marked "No Opinion" when asked whether race-based affirmative action should be replaced with class- or need-based affirmative action or a system based on merit only. (Click here to view the complete questionnaire and Bush's responses.)

Bush's own official web site offers no concrete examples of courage or principle on the issue of race. It does give a detailed bean-counting tally of which minority groups supported Bush's gubernatorial campaign in 1994; the site also brags about Bush's role in securing tax dollars for the Texas Rangers baseball stadium.

What's not mentioned was the governor's patently offensive, race-based sales pitch. As reported in the June 1999 issue of Texas Monthly, the awarding of minority-earmarked government contracts was instrumental to the stadium measure's passage. Black and Latino leaders attacked the deal – until Bush assuaged them with the promise of government giveaway goodies. Bush "spoke from the pulpit of the Mount Olive Baptist Church in Arlington," Texas Monthly reported, where he declared, "A vote for the tax would be a vote for contracts for African American businesses."

Egad. If this is the voice of compassionate conservatism, Democrats have nothing to fear.

Bush's legislative record is depressing. This year he signed laws supporting minority contracting set-asides; directing electric utilities to develop diversit y and set-aside plans; and creating race-tar geted, scholarship-matching programs run by the state higher education coordinating board. Apparently, this principle is too politically controversial for GOP presidential front-runner George W. Bush to embrace publicly and unequivocally -- and too complicated for GOP law-enforcement officials in Bush's home state of Texas to defend.

Although Bush claims to oppose racial quotas and preferences, he refuses to take a position on two landmark ballot measures that outlawed racial preferences by popular vote: California's Prop. 209 and Washington state's Initiative 200. More disturbing was Bush's failure to take a position on Prop. A, the 1997 Houston Civil Rights Initiative, which would have outlawed racial preferences in contracting by Houston city government.

If Bush cannot bring himself to support ballot initiatives that abolish government preferences, then his stated opposition to preferences is thin gruel.

Michelle Malkin