Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
As noted by my post, I was focusing on the last half of your statement, ingoring the first half. I apologize.

Yes, a broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause can have a downside, and does have a downside to those who view it in the strictest sense.

IMO, it has probably run it's course. I believe the last major USSC case which cited the Commerce Clause was struck down; United States v Lopez restored some sanity to the Commerce Clause, and the opinion in the case makes for good reading.

191 posted on 01/13/2003 11:05:03 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
I believe the last major USSC case which cited the Commerce Clause was struck down; United States v Lopez restored some sanity to the Commerce Clause, and the opinion in the case makes for good reading.

Might want to have a look at US v Morrison.

196 posted on 01/13/2003 11:20:13 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
Thanks and well said, rp.
210 posted on 01/13/2003 9:41:07 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson