Skip to comments.
Why libs will never have a Rush Limbaugh
Jewish World Review ^
| 1/9/03
| Marianne M. Jennings
Posted on 01/14/2003 2:56:58 PM PST by rhema
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: rhema
But, But....D.U. gots gold stars on their site!(/sarcasm)
21
posted on
01/14/2003 4:32:04 PM PST
by
Mark
To: Fraulein
Excellent point. Big government is bad, small government good. Who honestly wants the government to have more control over our lives? Well, the Welfare liberals do it seems.
I always post this when I see it happen. Why do we need to use these idiotic names for anyone (Fool Dumbahue, Dumbocrats, Hitlery, etc...)? I mean, honestly, we know you disagree with their policies. So-called witty names have no place in intelligent political discussions. That's my only problem with talk radio. Those names are thrown about like they're so very funny, when in reality, they're just dumb.
To: Buckeye Bomber
When we no longer have liberals to kick around anymore, we no longer have FUN! I mean, what's the use of living anymore?
23
posted on
01/14/2003 4:54:10 PM PST
by
Mark
To: Mark
I say, kick em around all you want. Put adjectives before their names. There are many good adjectives in the English language to describe the democratic party and its policies. Use those, not some dumb name. :-)
To: Buckeye Bomber
Why do we need to use these idiotic names for anyone (Fool Dumbahue, Dumbocrats, Hitlery, etc...)? I mean, honestly, we know you disagree with their policies. So-called witty names have no place in intelligent political discussions. That's my only problem with talk radio.Because if you say it enough times it begins to stick in the publics mind. Think of what they call Republicans every night on the nightly news. Uneducated, racist,gun nut, right wing, homophobic, hate filled, heterosexual, K-Mart shopping, Bible Toting, conservative, Evangelical, Christian Taliban, anti choice, Nazi! Lets not forget the "angry white male" or the "vast right wing conspiracy". I much more of a problem with the "main stream news media".
Politics have never been a gentlemans sport
To: Eric in the Ozarks
What about Doug Steffan ?I just sent a nastygram to my local talk radio station programming director in protest against the Doug Steffan show. Here was his response:
...good news for you and many others who won't tune in until after the 6-9 Doug Steffan show. A change is coming. Very soon, in fact. It will focus on local, national issues along with current events. Strangely, this area...democrats outnumber the republicans by a 2-1 margin. This program on from 6-9 is centered around liberals-yet no one wants to hear it. I think it is humorous.
Morning programming is, to be frank, a real bitch to find. Our hands were tied when Imus was forced off the air.
Imus cost us monthly $1,600. His numbers were slipping and advertisers were not buying. So we were spending that much and not even hitting half of the costs to run the program.
Rush, Sean Hannity and everyone else on our station cost absolutely nothing to air their programs. We stuck with Imus as long as we could..but the boat was nearly sunk when we pulled the plug.
26
posted on
01/14/2003 5:42:51 PM PST
by
Polycarp
To: Buckeye Bomber
Why do we need to use these idiotic names for anyone (Fool Dumbahue, Dumbocrats, Hitlery, etc...)? Hear, hear. The sobriquets for Sen. Daschle bother me the worst. Like anybody here needs to be reminded who (or what) he is.
27
posted on
01/14/2003 5:52:50 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Buckeye Bomber
Those names are thrown about like they're so very funny, when in reality, they're just dumbI've never heard a radio host use names like Fool Dumbahue, Dumbocrats and Hitlery. Those are all names I've only seen used by FReepers.
Here are some funny names I have heard radio hosts call Libs and other RATS, though:
Tom "Puff" Daschle
El Loco Poco Dicko
Algore
Grayout Davis
Gray Doofus
Gay Davis
Patsy "The Squint-Eyed" Schroeder (a blast from the past that still brings a smile to my face)
Calypso Louie
Serpenthead
The Forehead
To: Texas Eagle
I do like "Algore". I will tolerate that one. It's dumb, but at least it doesn't involve something stupid.
Gay Davis? Now there's a good one. I'm not actually asking for political correctness, but maybe if there weren't so many homophobic people in the Republican party, the Democrats would stop calling us homophobes. Well, knowing their modus operandi, they probably wouldn't, but even so, homophobia can't be good for a party that wants the government off of our backs.
To: Uncle Hal
Chuck Adler, of WRKO in Boston, remarked that "conservatives more easily relate to the values of middle-class listeners. Liberals feel superior to working families. Conservative talk-show hosts champion the values liberals disdain, like the work ethicwork hard and youll get ahead."
To: EggsAckley
Rush completely spoils the fantasy that the Liberals try to project in dominating the mainstream media.
To: rhema
To be a liberal today you have to believe, against all evidence, that most Americans are starving in squalid lean-tos eating scraps of food thrown out of their SUVs by disgustingly rich and wasteful environment -polluting Republicans. You have to believe that the Klan, actually every white Southerner and most Republicans wherever they are, still lynches Blacks and other minorities by the thousands yearly. You have to believe that every last wild tree has been cut down and that all the wilderness has been paved over for corporate parking lots. You have to believe that all men, when they are not sexually assaulting women, are making them have babies while cleaning the house (excuse me lean-to) and cooking the meager fare they've got because the nasty Republicans ate most of the food. Liberals think all conservatives are armed to the teeth with guns that go off by themselves and make normally peaceful persons crazed killers by the mere possession of a firearm. Naturally the nasty white Republicans got to the big pile of money that was just lying there first and took the lions share without working a day in their lives. Republicans are itching to start wars and invade peaceful countries full of non-violent and humane rulers like Saddam Hussein.
To be a liberal today is to be at war with reality and logic. If you think I'm making these generalities up, just visit some of the Democratic websites like DU and others.
To: Buckeye Bomber
C'mon...tell me you didn't laugh the first time you heard "Hildabeast".
33
posted on
01/14/2003 7:38:33 PM PST
by
motzman
(Screw NJGOP, support Schundler)
To: rhema
Good Post
34
posted on
01/14/2003 7:46:41 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(Tag Line Service Center: FREE Tag Line with Every Monthly Donation to FR. Get Yours. Inquire Within)
To: Capt. Tom
Mario Cuomo is a far greater talent than Limbaugh
Wha..Wha..WHAT!
35
posted on
01/14/2003 7:47:50 PM PST
by
motzman
(sfachim!)
To: Capt. Tom
....Mario Cuomo is a far greater talent than Limbaugh ...
I respectfully and fully disagree with your statment. Rush is good because his message is good but also because he takes his craft seriously. He knows every detail of his business and has the inspiration and drive to succeed. Who else could carry on a talk radio probgram for months without the ability to hear!!!?
Rush is one of the few that could do the program as a liberal and still succeed. His talent and ability would make up for the shallow message.
36
posted on
01/14/2003 7:49:47 PM PST
by
Joe_October
(Freep on Brother)
To: colorado tanker
They need to stuff the Nielsen ratings ballot box and pretend there really are lots of liberals out there. Sheesh. An excellent plan! They would be burning up money that would otherwise go toward buying and litigating elections and they would be heard by no one.
37
posted on
01/14/2003 7:55:32 PM PST
by
arthurus
To: rhema
great piece
38
posted on
01/14/2003 8:05:28 PM PST
by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: motzman
Nope.
39
posted on
01/14/2003 8:06:00 PM PST
by
altair
(who doesn't find any of the name calling here funny, only childish)
To: rhema
Good post!
It seems to me there won't be a liberal Rush, and I have evidence to support my theory. The sneaky evidence is the fact that there isn't one. If one could do what he does, one would be doing what he does. The market won't sustain it, for reasons that have been gone over and over.
It's not like it hasn't been tried, right? There's nothing stopping anyone from taking the red flag and waving it.
40
posted on
01/14/2003 8:13:32 PM PST
by
lainie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson