1 posted on
01/16/2003 3:49:03 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: All
2 posted on
01/16/2003 3:50:52 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kattracks
"At the beginning of the (20th) century, before we had the right to vote, all these [economic] territories were given away - automobile territories, fast food franchise territories, federal licenses, Homestead Act land grants, universities, all of this was given as largess," he said.They were giving away fast food franchises at the beginning of the 20th century?
3 posted on
01/16/2003 3:51:33 AM PST by
Poohbah
(Strategery is a beautiful thing :o)
To: kattracks
Wall Street was built on the site of a defensive wall for the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam. Still, even if Jesse Jackson was speaking figuratively, he's an idiot. What made America an industrial power and developed its industry was ingenuity, not slavery.
Regards, Ivan
4 posted on
01/16/2003 3:51:37 AM PST by
MadIvan
To: kattracks
Hey Jesse! The check's in the mail.
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Gypsy Jackson desperation alert!
Black conservative ping
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
6 posted on
01/16/2003 3:52:22 AM PST by
mhking
To: kattracks
BUMP
To: kattracks
This guy needs a padded room....
To: hobbes1; dubyaismypresident; CholeraJoe
honestly, i thought it was an Onion article!
11 posted on
01/16/2003 4:16:01 AM PST by
xsmommy
To: kattracks
"Wall Street is built on the backs of African people.
--------------------------
Wall street would exist as it does now regardless of the presence or absence of African people.
12 posted on
01/16/2003 4:16:13 AM PST by
RLK
To: kattracks
Um, Jesse? Wall Street isn't in Africa.
Um, Jesse? People came to America because they were poor, oppressed, and starving overseas. They got better here.
Um, Jesse? American slaves went from slavery to education and economic success in one generation. If not for the DEMOCRATIC Jim Crow laws, we wouldn't have had the lingering discrimination for a hundred years. But even evil forced segregation caused black businesses, black colleges, and the black community. But the REPUBLICAN supported Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended that.
Still, you're a clever opponent. I like your phrase, "the Trent Lott card".
To: kattracks
Sounds like the coffers for Operation Push (a.k.a. The First National Bank of, by, and for Jesse Jackson) are starting to get low, so it's time for his Spring shakedown of Wall Street. But what if this year's theme "Wall Street is a slave cemetary" doesn't play with the investors? What next? Will the "Rev. Jackson" try to declare a boycott of this financial institution?
I just hope that this is the year that someone in New York finally takes off the blinders and realizes that, after all these years, the people who've benefitted most from Jess Jackson's Operation Push/Rainbow Coalition is Jesse Jackson and his family.
15 posted on
01/16/2003 4:33:21 AM PST by
Exeter
To: kattracks
$10 says Jesse Jackass was an FBI Mole when he was with MLK
16 posted on
01/16/2003 4:33:53 AM PST by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: kattracks
"The shipping companies were involved in the transportation of slaves. Might they not have a legal obligation going back 200 years? That is what I think," Conyers told CNSNews.com.
Conyers noted that lawsuits against the insurance industry for its alleged profiting from the slave trade were already proliferating. "No one is waiting for [attorney] Johnnie Cochran...people are suing the crap out of them right now," Conyers explained."
___________________________________________________________
The answer to your first question, Mr. Conyers, is a resounding NO!. There is not responsibility that goes back 200 years and you are an idiot to believe that there is.
In response to your second point, they may be suing the crap out of them to use your colorful phrase but they have yet to win a case or to even have any cogent LEGAL arguments. ALL they offer are emotional appeals and skewed history.
You, sir, should take your reparations bill and place it in the hopper....the flushing kind.
18 posted on
01/16/2003 4:48:36 AM PST by
Adder
To: kattracks
"In 1840, there was more Africans enslaved in New York than there was in Charleston South Carolina," he said. "So if we didn't know all our history, then the conclusion [that blacks deserve reparations] might seem unfair."
And I suspect there was more Serfs in Russia and Prussia than Slaves in America at the time. Russia never gave a cent to the serfs when Tsar Alexander freed them but I think the government did pay the lords that owned the serfs money for their loss of value.
Therefore using 19th Century international actions as a guide it is the decendents of American Slave Owners who deserve reparations, not the slave decendents
19 posted on
01/16/2003 4:48:59 AM PST by
Swiss
To: kattracks
Last time I checked, there is NOTHING keeping ANYONE from LEAVING this country.........
20 posted on
01/16/2003 4:50:04 AM PST by
Elsie
(I trust in Jesus... how about you??)
To: kattracks
"The shipping companies were involved in the transportation of slaves. Might they not have a legal obligation going back 200 years? That is what I think," Conyers told CNSNews.com. Those who were shipped are dead, thus no plaintiff is around, nor even any member of their immediate families, around to make such claims.
Kindly shut up, Mr. Conyers. Race baiters like yourself are the true purveyors of division and hatred.
Ivan
23 posted on
01/16/2003 4:57:57 AM PST by
MadIvan
To: kattracks
But the North never had slavery so how do blacks have anything to do with Wall Street?
Remarks like this are racist because they imply that a small minority 12% had a larger impact on the prosperity of America than everyone else.
26 posted on
01/16/2003 5:15:27 AM PST by
Godel
To: kattracks
ALL YOUR BURIAL GROUNDS BELONG TO US
27 posted on
01/16/2003 5:19:24 AM PST by
Puppage
To: kattracks
IMO, the more press he gets, the better.
28 posted on
01/16/2003 5:23:52 AM PST by
Guillermo
(Sic em')
To: kattracks; All
"Jackson compared opposition to slave reparations to denying the holocaust." Classic apples and oranges comparison.
Jackson and the black caucus socialists are nothing if they are not dividing the country on racial lines.
30 posted on
01/16/2003 5:25:22 AM PST by
SunnyUsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson