Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple
Re-thinking Rush's comments, I am not so sure he is out of bounds. He seems to have limited his comments to apparent discrepancies between the speech and the brief, although I'm not sure the discrepancies are as great as they seem.

Michelle Malkin, on the other hand, appears to have mischaracterized the "Talented 20" in Florida and the "Top Ten" policy in Texas, set up by Jeb Bush and George W. Bush respectively. That is WAY out of bounds.
40 posted on 01/17/2003 10:53:12 AM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
The thing I don't understand is: why?

I mean, his speech ALREADY ticked off all the race hustlers, liberals, etc.

It's not like they're going to now be on Bush's side because they read the brief and realize that he's not really taking on anti-white racial discrimination all together.

What's the strategery here?

62 posted on 01/17/2003 11:08:38 AM PST by B Knotts (Relax. Don't worry. Have a homebrew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch; Luis Gonzalez
It wouldn't be the first time Ms. Malkin is wrong.
88 posted on 01/17/2003 12:03:15 PM PST by Howlin (It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson