Skip to comments.
UN's Ritter faced sex rap
New York Daily News ^
| 1/19/03
| Joe Mahoney
Posted on 01/19/2003 1:15:49 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 601-617 next last
To: DAnconia55
I didn't know that local resources were wasted in such a manner by local police. Taking pedophiles off the street is not a waste of local resources IMO.
I get the following type of e-mail every few weeks or so:
X-UIDL: 333413921
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Received: from myrmidon.mailrover.net [216.126.204.156] by mail.sisna.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id A11F1453023A; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 14:24:47 -0700
Received: from mail.powweb.com (mail.powweb.com [63.251.213.34])
by myrmidon.mailrover.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB3LHN801856
for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:17:23 -0700
Received: from jojo.com (h-66-134-183-195.DNVTCO56.covad.net [66.134.183.195])
by mail.powweb.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 039161BB24F
for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 13:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (79.134.41.248)
by rly-xr02.nikavo.net with SMTP; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:24:39 +0700
Received: from [103.109.47.179] by mail.gimmixx.net with asmtp; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 22:22:43 -0700
Received: from [95.32.225.217] by mailout2-eri1.midmouth.com with esmtp; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:20:47 +0900
Reply-To:
Message-ID: <013c71d57e3e$3147b7b6$6da45ae2@nxbocq>
From:
To: users@mail.powweb.com
Subject: Whats up :)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:03:56 -1100
MiME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Importance: Normal
X-RCPT-TO:
Status: R
X-UIDL: 333413921
Hi my name is Anna. I saw your profile on Internet. I am new to the area and am
looking for someone to show me around or just chat since I'm pretty much alone. If
you're interested in hanging out with a cool girl send me an email at AnnaSvetcy87@hotmail.com and
we can chat. Hope to hear from you soon!!
0 0
>
- _ _ -
-Anna
6640JODP1-801UStK7961belZ7-123VDJl5393aHVt9-417VYmy7859Ll53
And I never respond.
161
posted on
01/19/2003 7:41:47 AM PST
by
BullDog108
(Kick their @$$ and take their gas!)
To: DAnconia55
If so, then surely the FBI/CIA would know and would have known. The makes the case even easier. All you have to do is set up a LOCAL sting (less press, easier to keep quiet for blackmail purposes).
Since you KNOW Ritter is going to be looking for sex online, entrapment is a piece of cake.
Your theory doesn't make sense though. Why would the government be blackmailing Ritter to speak out against the government?
162
posted on
01/19/2003 7:44:37 AM PST
by
Amelia
(Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
To: angkor; Miss Marple; hchutch; Dog; Dog Gone; Howlin
angkor thanks for post this time line of the sudden behavior change of Ritter re his sugar daddy, Uncle Soddomite.
I had just posted a reply to Miss Marple about this sudden turnaround without the time line. Thanks! Here are some snips from your reply re the timeline of his turnabout:
Here's a pretty good timeline of his turnabout, from The Weekly Standard:
Saddam Hussein's American Apologist
From the November 19, 2001 issue: The strange career of former U.N. arms inspector Scott Ritter.
by Stephen F. Hayes, 11/19/2001, Volume 007, Issue 10 [snip]
The part about admiring and greeting is literal. Ritter was welcomed back to Baghdad in July 2000, with the blessing of Saddam Hussein. The reason for his trip? To produce a documentary film, "In Shifting Sands," that would chronicle the weapons-inspection process and, he says, "de-demonize" Iraq. The 90-minute film, which he says he is close to selling to a broadcast outlet, was produced with the approval of the Iraqi government and features interviews with numerous high-level Iraqi officials, including Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz.
U.S. intelligence officials and arms control advocates say Ritter has been played--perhaps unwittingly--by Saddam Hussein. "If you're Scott Ritter," says one arms expert, "the former 'cowboy' weapons inspector, kicked out by Saddam Hussein, you're not going to get back into Iraq unless Saddam Hussein invites you and wants you there."
[SNIP]
All inspections stopped in December 1998. That same month, in an article written for the New Republic, Ritter again warned of the continuing Iraqi threat, this time in much greater detail. "Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed," he maintained. "Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production."
Ritter is one of many modern day Judases out trying to defend Uncle Soddomite. Money and records of their dark side life styles are probably the key motivitators. Ritter's case is right out of the KGB handbook of how to turn an enemy into your ally.
163
posted on
01/19/2003 7:45:14 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Free Republic, the site supported by those who don't believe in free lunches! Are you a donor?)
To: MeeknMing
164
posted on
01/19/2003 7:45:37 AM PST
by
bvw
To: jwalsh07
The burden is on you to demonstrate a vast right wing conspiracy. The facts don't preclude a vast left wing conspiracy.
Or a vast both wings conspiracy.
Or a vast no wing conspiracy.
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one
For observations like : It's snowing. Or where did my car keys go? Or why is the tub overflowing? - Yes, you're right.
But you fail to recognize that any conspiracy (I assume you're capable of admiting that they do exist) - is designed to appear innocent. It is designed specifically to be explained away by "occam's razor".
Only when exposed or questioned does the razor test fail.
Don't be pavlovian. The press is not your friend. It does not serve your interests. It serves the interests of the government, usually.
To: kattracks
Thanks for the ping, kattracks! Will ping others...
166
posted on
01/19/2003 7:46:34 AM PST
by
nutmeg
To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Doctor Raoul; Neets; evilC; Black Agnes; Cacique; ...
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ping list.
167
posted on
01/19/2003 7:48:11 AM PST
by
nutmeg
To: DAnconia55
'Then why seal the records?' It could be he his keen lawyer was able to get the records sealed.
168
posted on
01/19/2003 7:50:10 AM PST
by
new cruelty
(Read this tagline, then see the movie!)
To: agrandis
This is ALWAYS the way the Big Boys control people You and I understand this. But appearantly we are in the minority.
By the way, this underage stuff is the perfect tool, because to fight a charge means to expose yourself publicly, and people are loathe to expose themselves publicly even as a POSSIBLE pedophile, no?
Yep. I didn't word it so directly, but that's what I was getting at.
The Liberterians would be pretty much just as bad if they were ever to get to office, because many of their candidates have no personal character, and would be compromised and tempted beyond their ability to resist, in our current evil climate
Tend to disagree. If they wear their vices on their sleeves, there is nothing to blackmail them with. But the organized LP isn't very likely to win office, considering their leadership (way off topic). We need more stealth libertarians running as GOP.
To: kattracks
Could this have anything to do with Ritter suddenly becoming so chummy with Iraq? Saddam can give him all the little girls he wants if he just says the right things.
So9
170
posted on
01/19/2003 7:51:31 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: BullDog108
You do have an interesting Inbox.
I mostly get porn spams and "increase your penis size" and "increase your breast size with breast cream".
Scary combination, really.
To: Servant of the Nine
Wonder if Saddamn's got anything on members of Congress?
To: DAnconia55
Doesn't pass the smell test.
- Scott Ritter was secretly prosecuted in Albany County ...snared in an Internet sex sting operation
- arrested by Colonie Police in June 2001 on a misdemeanor charge ~ a sexual discussion on the Internet with an undercover investigator...
- law enforcement sources disclosed on condition of anonymity
- case was sealed, and Colonie officials declined to release the arrest records
- the matter was adjourned in local court in contemplation of dismissal.
You're right on the smell test DAncon. Perhaps a FR legal mind can answer:
- why would the matter be adjourned? Circumstances for such action?
- why seal the case and decline to release the arrest records? again, circumstances?
And what's with the anonymity on the part of LE? BTW, as I read it, the situation is *not* a kiddie porn issue - in which the FBI was hot 'n heavy in 2001 investigations (maybe still?).
To: Amelia
Your theory doesn't make sense though. Why would the government be blackmailing Ritter to speak out against the government? 1. They want the dissent for some reason. Setting up your own opposition can be an interesting and useful tactic sometimes.
2. Democrats would want Ritter to speak out against Bush.
3. An anti-war force within the government would want Ritter to speak out against war with Iraq.
Three off the top of my head.
To: Miss Marple
If the assistant DA did it at directions of someone other than the DA, that would indicate reasons for her dismissal. WHO did this? (A certain junior New Yorok senator comes to mind, but heck, that may just be my tin foil tendencies.)I was thinking along the same lines. I'm certain we haven't heard all there is to know on this issue yet.
175
posted on
01/19/2003 7:57:10 AM PST
by
BOBTHENAILER
(Oppose all Environmental Groups)
To: Grampa Dave
Ritter was welcomed back to Baghdad in July 2000 Arrrested 2001.
Note to self - don't become famous and think about criticising the government unless you're not seeking sex on the internet.
I still think it's framed but guilty. The leaked files are because Ritter won't/wouldn't shut up.
To: new cruelty
It could be he his keen lawyer was able to get the records sealed. With the cooperation of a judge, and the prosecutor, while removing the sealing of the records from the record.
That's a conspiracy.
To: GirlShortstop
law enforcement sources disclosed on condition of anonymity Yep. That just screams political leak to the press, doesn't it?
To: kattracks
You gotta figure the Iraqi secret police knew it, and used it. If Ritter was trolling the net, there's a good chance he was trolling the streets of Baghdad.
To: agrandis
Oh - we both missed one.
Perhaps Ritter likes college girls, and didn't want his wife to know he was playing hide the salami on the side. If the 'girl' was identified as 17 in her profile....
Perfectly reasonable he's cooperated with the cops instead of letting his wife know.
180
posted on
01/19/2003 8:01:29 AM PST
by
DAnconia55
(Note: cover all blackmailable situations with people you trust. The goverment is the common enemy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 601-617 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson