Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DAnconia55
Your theory is also lacking in elementary logic. If the administration wanted to shut him up, why didn't they simply tell him to be quiet, or quiet him permanently? (Taking the cynical view you propose for the sake of argument.)

Why allow a loose cannon to go around attacking the administration? It is far more likely to me that someone wanted to discredit the administration, and therefore blackmailed Ritter into attacking Bush in the media.

Especially because Ritter was VERY anti-Clinton in his testimony before Biden.

122 posted on 01/19/2003 6:40:12 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
It is far more likely to me that someone wanted to discredit the administration, and therefore blackmailed Ritter into attacking Bush in the media.

Anything anti-Demonkrat and Pro-Bush is automatically more likely to you. You're a partisan.

In reality, it's equally likely as the other possibilities I have outlined. Because we don't have enough evidence yet.

141 posted on 01/19/2003 7:08:55 AM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson