Replies

You know, there is no way to argue with your point of view. You offer no proof, but those who disagree with you are "maive."

Personally, I think you are overly cynical, and are becoming perilously close to sounding like Grimma Wormtongue..

I choose to believe that there are more good people than bad, that there are men who serve our nation with honor, and that many of those people are currently in Washington.

I suppose your way of looking at things means you are never disappointed, but it is such an unhappy way to go through life. Of course, it does allow you to feel superior to everyone, doesn't it?

You know, there is no way to argue with your point of view. You offer no proof, but those who disagree with you are "naive."

Sure there is. Produce evidence. Your speculation is just as much speculation as my speculation is.

Yet you credit your speculation as fact because it agrees with a news report. And further, you ignore evidence contrary to your assertions, and you ignore when your speculation has errors (Who appoints federal judges? - The reward could EASILY come from the Executive.)

I am trying to look for actual logical holes in a story. Critical thinking. This story doesn't look right.

All you're doing is trying to find a way to blame democrats for something. (Covering up the records) I am not interested in speculation/logic for the sake of supporting one partisan power over another. You are.

I suppose your way of looking at things means you are never disappointed, but it is such an unhappy way to go through life. Of course, it does allow you to feel superior to everyone, doesn't it?

Hadly so. That ideologue loon also likes to argue for the legalization of child pornography possession.