Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy calls for employer-paid health coverage - Think Senator - who actually pays?
Boston Globe ^ | January 19, 20043 | Wayne Washington

Posted on 01/19/2003 2:18:05 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:08:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON - Employers with five or more workers would be required to pay for most of their health coverage under a new proposal from Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts.

Kennedy, a Democrat, has long pushed for coverage of the uninsured, whose numbers are expected to rise over the 50 million mark within six years. His new plan would require employers to pay 75 percent of the cost of coverage for their employees, who would pay for the rest.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: always; thepeoplepay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
- Champion of big government - Senator Edward M. Kennedy

Just how expensive the plan would be - or where the money for it would come from - is still being determined, Kennedy said.

Really, well here's a tip Ted, it will cost more and it will come out of paychecks.

1 posted on 01/19/2003 2:18:05 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Marxists aren't just pretending to want control

Send them packing. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/19/2003 2:19:02 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
Kennedy's plan would offer federal subsidies to small businesses to help defray the costs of providing coverage.

I guess those subsidies fall into the federal treasury while we're sleeping.

3 posted on 01/19/2003 2:22:33 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The democrats (or at least their trial lawyer contingency) destroy the health care delivery system, then seek to control it as the "saviors of the people."
4 posted on 01/19/2003 2:23:40 AM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: friendly
The health care system is in a shambles. It sucks money from paychecks, demands tons of paperwork, employs countless clerks to file for expensive third-party pay, falls back on bean counters to select your ability to receive treatment, etc. Not to mention, law suit abuse by the Democratic Party's number one campaign contributors, trial lawyers.
5 posted on 01/19/2003 2:30:08 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Ted better let us print our own money, because there is no way my wfe's business can afford to do this. There is a limit to what someone will spend on a cup of coffee.
6 posted on 01/19/2003 4:57:30 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklin
.... there is no way my wfe's business can afford to do this.

LIBERALS never get it right.

Ted needs to get a job. That exercise in reality might clear out the cobwebs.

7 posted on 01/19/2003 5:06:25 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
''If this was an easy problem, it would have been solved long ago,'' he said.

Correction: If this were a problem that wasn't caused by government meddling, it would have been solved long ago.

8 posted on 01/19/2003 5:11:46 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Bump to that!
9 posted on 01/19/2003 5:16:53 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Wasn't Teddy boy the one who pushed the bill that created HMO's? Now that they don't work, he wants to try another government mandated program. Dims want power, not rea-life solutions.
10 posted on 01/19/2003 5:24:10 AM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Employers with five or more workers would be required to pay for most of their health coverage under a new proposal from Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts."

FIVE or more employees?! ~Is he completely insane? ~ And, of course, he's going to tell them WHAT the coverage should be.

Hillary!'s behind this. It's her health care reform baby dressed in a clean diaper.

The dimms need to be stopped before they put a stake through the hearts of job creation AND the health care system.

11 posted on 01/19/2003 5:24:42 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Hillary!'s behind this. It's her health care reform baby dressed in a clean diaper.

They've been slowing working universal health care in through public school programs.

12 posted on 01/19/2003 5:25:58 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
''Most employers provide coverage,'' he said. ''Those who aren't providing it are at a competitive advantage

This statement shows how either out of touch he is or just plain stupid.

Probably both

13 posted on 01/19/2003 5:28:54 AM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
Probably both

Bump!

14 posted on 01/19/2003 5:32:46 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The DemocRATS won't give up. We must educate the public and expose each attempt they make to incrementally implement the very plan voters said "no" to in 1994.
15 posted on 01/19/2003 5:33:47 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Well, I guess that being a democRAT, he doesn't mind more jobs going overseas. DUH!
16 posted on 01/19/2003 5:35:50 AM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I agree but sadly, it would seem, the majority is "getting" something from Uncle Sam and like it.
17 posted on 01/19/2003 5:36:59 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Kennedy's plan would offer federal subsidies to small businesses to help defray the costs of providing coverage. Firms with 10 or fewer employees and average wages of $10,000 or less would receive subsidies of half of the employer's costs.

In other words, taxpayers pay - halfway to universal "HIllary-Care".

18 posted on 01/19/2003 5:37:44 AM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
So we open a small business, relying on a low level wage earners so we can start building equity and grow the business. Now suddenly, the government tells me I must provide my employees with comprehensive medical insurance. I have four choices them 1) Lay off enough employees so I can cover the remaining 2) Reduce everyone's pay and offer them outright medical coverage for their labour 3) Fire all of them and rehire them as contractors 4) Screw the whole thing and close my doors, I'll never make any money anyway.

Oh, I love the part about the government providing "subsidies" for small businesses. So just how far and how long to I have to crawl on my knees on order to get them? One too many "Whites" working for me? "NO SUBSIDIES FOR YOU!" Only English speaking employees? "NO SUBSIDIES FOR YOU!" My small business plays heavily towards my Christian faith? "NO SUBSIDIES FOR YOU!"

Glory be! Sounds like a plan, Mr. Chappaquidic!

19 posted on 01/19/2003 5:40:31 AM PST by Caipirabob (These tag lines are gonna get me in big trouble soon, I just know it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
No sweat, as long as every employer gets the same break as the US Government. I work for the USDA and I don't have health care coverage. Here's how it works. You classify your employees as Temporary Workers and they are not entitled to retirement or insurance benefits. You renew their contract every year. At least half of USDA employees have worked 5, 10, 15, and even 20 years with USDA without insurance or retirement benefits.
20 posted on 01/19/2003 5:44:28 AM PST by Nubbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson