Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoner
I'm on a gun web site and only six other people admitted to calling their reps to stop the Assault Weapons Bill.

This one is too important to leave to others. It's up to us.

Also, call your gun group and make sure they're doing everything possible to stop it.
60 posted on 01/20/2003 6:40:15 AM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Shooter 2.5
Here's my letter:

I am writing to ask for your support of bill HR1762, sponsored by Ron Paul (R-TX) and three other Republican members of Congress.

HR1762, the “Second Amendment Protection Act of 2001”, changes or repeals certain federal laws to avoid infringements on the 2nd amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states as follows: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Specifically, HR1762, does the following:

1) Repeals Public Law 103-159, commonly known as the “Brady Bill”, which requires a background check on Americans before they purchase a handgun from a federally licensed dealer. This law does little to prevent hardened criminals from acquiring firearms (one wonders why they were released from jail in the first place if they were so dangerous), and is an unnecessary harassment to the American people. The exercise of our 2nd amendment Rights should require no more of a background check than those required to exercise other Rights, some of which are enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

2) Repeals Title XI of Public Law 103-322, commonly referred to as the “Assault Weapons Ban”, which bans the possession of certain types of semi-automatic rifles manufactured after 1994, and the possession of magazines that were manufactured after 1994 and are capable of containing more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Once again, this law infringes upon the 2nd amendment Rights of Americans. It is the moral and legal equivalent of banning certain types of printing presses simply because politicians don’t like their physical appearance. This law does nothing to prevent crime, and serves only to (once again) harass honest Americans.

3) Modifies Public Law 90-618 and Public Law 90-351, “by striking `which the Secretary finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes,' and `which the owner intends to use solely for sporting purposes’ …. and ‘insert[ing] in lieu thereof `lawful purposes'.” Essentially, this transfers the regulation of certain firearms from an unelected official (the Secretary of the Treasury) to the elected Congress, and ensures that the definition of what constitutes a “sporting purpose” is not left up to the whim of the Secretary, since the phrase “sporting purpose” is simply replaced with the phrase “lawful purpose”.

Not only does this legislation take a step toward aligning federal law with the Bill of Rights, it will also free up the time of federal law enforcement officers to pursue more important things, such as threats to our nation from foreign powers.

It is the duty of all members of Congress to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States”. This legislation does exactly that by repealing certain unconstitutional laws enacted by past Congresses, which not only infringed upon our 2nd amendment Rights, but also usurped the Constitutional method of changing the Bill of Rights.

87 posted on 01/20/2003 9:17:28 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson