Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babyface00
There's no business case - its purely driven by Microsoft. Believe me, its resented all the way up the chain, because everyone has to use the same reason; there's no good business case, its because Microsoft is forcing us.

your post here and the other above are a big part of why all of our backoffice machines run linux. the equipment is 4-5 years old for the most part. it runs fine, and doesn't need updating from a performance standpoint. the services (email, fileserving, printing, vpn) all work to our satisfaction, and we don't need additional features. why on earth should we put our business in a position that it is forced to spend thousands of dollars when the only benefit is to microsoft? dows, as to their liking.

an aside: i don't know why houston picked simdesk. i would think openoffice, or staroffice even, would be a much better substitute. well, i have an idea or two, but they certainly don't relate to technical merit or the ability to solve problems.

14 posted on 01/22/2003 11:29:12 AM PST by danelectro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: danelectro
It seems that Simdesk's selection would fall under the classification "insider deal".
16 posted on 01/22/2003 11:31:05 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson