Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Don't Have the Constitution for Racial Equality [Ann Coulter]
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | Thursday, January 23, 2003 | By Ann Coulter

Posted on 01/22/2003 11:28:50 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Democrats Don't Have the Constitution for Racial Equality
By Ann Coulter
FrontPageMagazine.com | January 23, 2003


All the blather about the University of Michigan race discrimination case has at least proved one thing: The Supreme Court's abandonment of legal reasoning has taken the public by storm! Now everyone treats constitutional law as if it is an ongoing referendum about various public policy issues. Pundits simply assume state colleges are allowed to create a racial stew. It's just a question of whether this or that system is desirable as a public policy matter. We hear about stigmas, legacies, SAT scores, athletes – all of which have nothing to do with the Constitution.

Even the wackiest Supreme Court rulings always make a big show of pretending to consult the Constitution before announcing, for example, that Christmas displays must have a particular ratio of reindeer to virgins. I don't know whom the Supreme Court thought it was fooling, but Americans were not fooled. The Growing Constitution has grown into a collection of primal urges, devoid of law. People believe their wild irrational appetites should find expression in Supreme Court opinions. We await Supreme Court rulings like primitives waiting for a wart healer's cure. Liberals love this system of pretend-law, because it allows them to get away with murder – sometimes literally, as in Roe v. Wade.

Like everyone else in the universe, I too have strong opinions about how universities should run their admissions systems. But there is no Ann's Opinion Clause in the Constitution. There is, however, an Equal Protection Clause.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution prohibits states from discriminating on the basis of race. It says: Nor shall any state "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." That amendment grew out of the Republicans' first big dust-up with the Democrats over race – the Civil War. Then, as now, Democrats demanded the right to discriminate on the basis of race. The 14th Amendment sternly informed Democrats that they would have to stop. Democrats dropped slavery but desperately clung to state-sanctioned race discrimination for another hundred years.

It took a Supreme Court ruling in 1954 and a Republican president sending in the National Guard to force Democrats to stop their infernal race discrimination. In the 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court held that the Equal Protection Clause prohibited the states from engaging in race discrimination in education. Democrats responded with massive resistance.

Ten years later, Congress passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, expanding upon the nondiscrimination principle of the Equal Protection Clause. Among other things, the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits any institution that receives federal funds – i.e., Harvard – from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin. Though only a bare majority of Democrats voted for the act, it seemed as if the Democrats were finally going to mend their ways and truly embrace a color-blind society.

Alas, they were just resting up for the next battle. After taking a few years off, the Democrats got back into race discrimination in a big way. They apparently thought they could fool us by switching which race they thought should be discriminated against. It must be something in Democratic genes. They just love race discrimination.

So now we have idiots like Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., saying race discrimination is no different than colleges admitting legacies. One difference is – as Terry Eastland famously said – we didn't fight a civil war to stop colleges from giving a preference to the children of alumni. But Biden says colleges shouldn't stop obsessing with race "unless we're going to eliminate it all, all incentives, like, for example, in the case in Michigan everybody is talking about now. You know you get four points if you're a legacy ..." Sure, that's just like getting 20 points for being black.

Biden thinks if he gets applause from a student audience, he must have made a legal argument. He seems to imagine he is actually learning law from watching Court TV. His next irrelevant point was: "Give me a break. I mean how many people would get into Harvard, Yale and the rest of these places if their father had not gone?" There's an answer to that! This columnist did the math! On the basis of their SAT scores, 82 percent of legacies admitted to Harvard would have been admitted to Harvard even if they were not legacies. Only 45 percent of blacks admitted to Harvard would have been admitted to Harvard if they were not black.

But I've been tricked into arguing a nonissue by Biden's imbecility. If colleges wanted to admit only legacies, or only tuba players, or only people who got astonishingly low SAT scores – to ensure some of their graduates would be U.S. senators one day – the Constitution wouldn't stop them.

What the states, including state colleges, cannot do under the Constitution is discriminate on the basis of race. What even private colleges cannot do under federal law – if they accept federal funds – is discriminate on the basis of race. Neither the Constitution nor federal law says anything about discrimination on the basis of SAT scores, legacies or athletic ability. We've had a civil war, a constitutional amendment, a Supreme Court ruling, a National Guard mobilization and a federal civil rights law to try to get the Democrats to stop with the race discrimination. All we can do now is sit back and wait for the wart healers to speak.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Thursday, January 23, 2003

Quote of the Day by PhilDragoo

1 posted on 01/22/2003 11:28:50 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Tom Daschle, This One's For You!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/22/2003 11:30:00 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
How INTERESTING!
3 posted on 01/22/2003 11:37:58 PM PST by Bradís Gramma (Rid the country of the Clintons Donate $5 a month to Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

Ann Coulter MEGA PING!!


4 posted on 01/22/2003 11:46:45 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I've got Jury Duty today. So I'll be busy dishing out Texas justice in the Dallas County Criminal Court today! Where's the rope???...



5 posted on 01/23/2003 2:28:19 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All


6 posted on 01/23/2003 2:29:23 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All


7 posted on 01/23/2003 2:29:53 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All


8 posted on 01/23/2003 2:30:26 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All



9 posted on 01/23/2003 2:30:41 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

10 posted on 01/23/2003 4:32:50 AM PST by BraveMan (-20 wind chill denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan
SIGH!! Love this picture. Brilliant, beautiful woman.
11 posted on 01/23/2003 5:42:49 AM PST by Gort_Klaatu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
To mis-quote the Sundance Kid, "Think ya used enough
pictures there, Butch?"
12 posted on 01/23/2003 5:45:16 AM PST by G-Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gort_Klaatu
SIGH!! Love this picture. Brilliant, beautiful woman.
13 posted on 01/23/2003 5:46:44 AM PST by Gort_Klaatu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gort_Klaatu
I'll take Laura Ingraham's pics.....anybody have these lol.

But, Ann's breakdown of the Civil War, 14th Amendment, Brown v. Bd of Ed, and Civil Rights Act of 1964 is right on.
14 posted on 01/23/2003 6:23:06 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Be Well - Be Armed - Be Safe - Molon Labe!
15 posted on 01/23/2003 10:41:40 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
All you pix posters are just making my day. Thank you.
16 posted on 01/23/2003 11:20:32 AM PST by AGreatPer (Freepers in D.C. did a great job Saturday and Sunday. Thank You and Proud of You.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

17 posted on 01/23/2003 1:32:20 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Great, AGreatPix onedoug.

Actually, I have a pix of her and me at the March for Justice.

We were both walking back from the battle ground and just hooked up. I asked, she said yes, and it was over. Guess I got more than most guys in this world. We are talking about a picture, arn't we?

Actually, I have been in a business environment with her on the same side, thankfully. All I can say, because it is personal, she is classy and business like.

18 posted on 01/23/2003 4:22:10 PM PST by AGreatPer (Freepers in D.C. did a great job Saturday and Sunday. Thank You and Proud of You.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Ann is, as usual, brilliant. Bump so others will see this.
19 posted on 01/23/2003 5:05:28 PM PST by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thanks, JH2. Great article. You never read Ann Coulter and scratch your head and wonder, "What's she trying to say?"
20 posted on 01/23/2003 5:45:25 PM PST by solzhenitsyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thanks for the ping...
21 posted on 01/23/2003 8:49:25 PM PST by Michael Barnes (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer; BraveMan
My pleasure, FRiend !

And thank you, BraveMan, for the pic on #10...

22 posted on 01/23/2003 10:04:31 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A great big I Love Ann Coulter BUMP.
Another masterpiece.
23 posted on 01/23/2003 10:16:26 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Great job with the pictures! Thanks!
24 posted on 01/23/2003 10:19:48 PM PST by Lancey Howard (And the 10th Republican thinks......what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Ann Coulter is a genius ;^)
25 posted on 01/23/2003 10:47:39 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Great to see ya, my friend -- hope jury duty went well.
26 posted on 01/23/2003 10:48:03 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thanks, my FRiend. It did. Here is the text of my one day jury duty adventure for anyone that might want to see it. (Link should go directly to post #199).
27 posted on 01/24/2003 10:04:24 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I am bumping this old thread because it is relevant again.
Can you please adjust the headline to reflect "repost" so readers don't get confused?
28 posted on 06/24/2003 6:26:28 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

29 posted on 06/24/2003 6:27:21 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Nice article.
Miss Coulter, if you get tired of hanging out in DC, and are thinking about getting married, barefoot and pregnant, just ping me.
30 posted on 06/24/2003 6:36:41 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Get in (a very long) line, pal.
31 posted on 06/24/2003 6:40:59 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
The unabashed admiration for Ann Coulter makes me think we could drop the "o" from her name.
32 posted on 06/24/2003 6:46:48 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
The unabashed admiration for Ann Coulter makes me think we could drop the "o" from her name.

Or maybe add a few. Whatever.

33 posted on 06/24/2003 6:56:08 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

34 posted on 08/09/2003 10:07:17 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson