[TLBSHOW]

That should be used first I would think and we don't send any of our boys in just NUKE IRAQ!

[putupon]

we don't send any of our boys in just NUKE IRAQ!

Ditto that, the Islamists problem could been solved on 9-12-2001 if we had nuked the deserving nations.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Nukes in response to WMD attack seems reasonable to me, eh Mr. Bill? :O)

[kristinn]

We're not trying to slaughter Iraqi civilians. Just like Afghanistan, we'll attack surgically to minimize civilian casualties.

[ewing]

I think the rest of the world would kind of frown on us nuking Saddam pre emptively.

We already have an EMT/Electromagnetic Pulse bomb that will destroy every computer and electronic circut in Baghdad and make it inoperable for the next 1,000 years..I would use that first!

[elfman2]

”That should be used first I would think and we don't send any of our boys in just NUKE IRAQ!”

Sure, that wouldn’t pull the plug on anti- terrorism cooperation we're getting from Europe, Russia, Asia, Africa, South America and the Antarctic. Tens of millions of radioactive civies wouldn’t send the rest of the world scrambling to the UN’s world government vision for protection. That wouldn’t nations racing into covert WMD programs. Why is it that the Left is able to portray us as Kooks again?

[WatchNKorea]

"The United States is quietly preparing for the use of tatical nuclear weapons in a war against Iraq..."

Sounds good to me!

[ffusco]

liberate not destroy.

[ffusco]

liberate not destroy.